Started By
Message
re: Difinitive List of the BEST SEC Schools for WR's (past decade)
Posted on 2/25/15 at 2:00 pm to CockInYourEar
Posted on 2/25/15 at 2:00 pm to CockInYourEar
quote:
2. LSU
19 - 4* or 5* commits
0 - 1st Team All SEC
0 - AP All Americans
11 - Players Drafted
So pretty much the talent at WR is there, we just dont have a QB
2
Posted on 2/25/15 at 2:06 pm to Gamecox20
Career Stats:
Julio Jones: 179 catches, 2653 yards, 15 TDs
Amari Cooper: 228 catches, 3463 yards, 31 TDs
Alshon Jeffery: 183 catches, 3042 yards, 23 TDs
Sidney Rice*: 142 catches, 2233 yards, 23 TDs
*Sidney Rice only played 2 years. He may have set many SEC records had he kept a similar pace in his 3rd year
Julio Jones: 179 catches, 2653 yards, 15 TDs
Amari Cooper: 228 catches, 3463 yards, 31 TDs
Alshon Jeffery: 183 catches, 3042 yards, 23 TDs
Sidney Rice*: 142 catches, 2233 yards, 23 TDs
*Sidney Rice only played 2 years. He may have set many SEC records had he kept a similar pace in his 3rd year
This post was edited on 2/25/15 at 2:20 pm
Posted on 2/25/15 at 2:18 pm to CockInYourEar
quote:
2. LSU
quote:
11 - Players Drafted
This is the only factor that matters
Posted on 2/25/15 at 2:28 pm to LSU_Saints_Hornets
We are sending more than 50% of our WRs to the NFL yet we are # 2 
11 drafted:19 4 or 5 stars recruits..........
11 drafted:19 4 or 5 stars recruits..........
This post was edited on 2/25/15 at 2:29 pm
Posted on 2/25/15 at 2:35 pm to L S Usetheforce
quote:
We are sending more than 50% of our WRs to the NFL yet we are # 2
I might need to clarify that for you. you had 11 WR's drafted in the past 10 years. You had nineteen 4* or 5* recruits. So you ddin't have over 50% of your WR's drafted, b/c you also took in 3* WR's and maybe some 2*'s, (I don't know how many total WR's you took over that 10 years.)
Posted on 2/25/15 at 3:14 pm to CockInYourEar
The article said that LSU was #1, Tenn was #2 and SC was #3.
Posted on 2/25/15 at 3:38 pm to CockInYourEar
quote:
Difinitive List of the BEST SEC Schools for WR's (past decade)
LINK /
1. SC
6 - 4* or 5* commits
4 - 1st Team All SEC
1 - AP All Americans
6 - Players Drafted
2. LSU
19 - 4* or 5* commits
0 - 1st Team All SEC
0 - AP All Americans
11 - Players Drafted
3. Tenn
15 - 4* or 5* commits
2 - 1st Team All SEC
1- AP All Americans
4 - Players Drafted
(* From article's perspective, they gave too much credit in their calculations for getting 4* or 5* receivers, that doesn't matter. It's what the receivers do when they're in college that matters AND if you did get 4* or 5* guys, how well did they do?)
(SIDE NOTE)
Schools with the WORST ratio of 4* or 5* commits divided by WR's drafted into the NFL.
Miss St - 4 - 4* or 5* WR's. 0 were drafted. 0%
Bama - 16 4* or 5* WR's, 2 were Drafted. 12.5%
Ole Miss - 11 4* or 5* WR's. 2 were Drafted. 18.2%
Tenn - 15 4* or 5* WR's. 4 were Drafted. 26.6%
4. ARK
6 - 4*or5* commits
2 - 1st Team All SEC
1 - AP All Americans
6 - Players Drafted
Posted on 2/25/15 at 3:39 pm to CockInYourEar
quote:
(* From article's perspective, they gave too much credit in their calculations for getting 4* or 5* receivers, that doesn't matter. It's what the receivers do when they're in college that matters AND if you did get 4* or 5* guys, how well did they do?)
This. Plus, Moncrief is the only 4/5* WR that's been drafted from Ole Miss. Wallace was a 2* and McCluster(if you count him) was a 3*.
This post was edited on 2/25/15 at 3:45 pm
Posted on 2/25/15 at 3:47 pm to CockInYourEar
quote:
Ole Miss - 11 4* or 5* WR's. 2 were Drafted. 18.2%
I think about 6 of those 4/5* never made it past their freshman year
Posted on 2/25/15 at 4:11 pm to Prof
He reranked them according to his personal system.
Posted on 2/25/15 at 4:26 pm to CockInYourEar
quote:
It shouldn’t be any surprise that LSU crushes the rest of the SEC by a wide margin. Reigning NFL Offensive Rookie of the Year Odell Beckham Jr. and former running mate Jarvis Landry are fresh in everyone’s mind after the way they tore up the pros this season. It’s not just those two, though. LSU has nearly double the number of players drafted over the last decade of any other SEC team.
Yet you try to put your team first? Get the frick out of here with that bullshite
Posted on 2/25/15 at 4:47 pm to JJ27
You are trying to justify his original formula. Why does it matter how many more 4 or 5 *'s you get? How much more do they matter than having 1st Team All SEC or All American players?
Posted on 2/25/15 at 4:51 pm to CockInYourEar
11 WRs drafted>>>>>6 WRs drafted. Skew the numbers if you must, LSU wins this debate hands down.
Posted on 2/25/15 at 4:57 pm to CockInYourEar
No one chooses a school to be all sec. They choose a school that will get them to the league. LSU does that better than any other SEC school for WRs.
Posted on 2/25/15 at 6:01 pm to CockInYourEar
That article doesnt have south Carolina number 1.
Its lsu then tenn.
Its lsu then tenn.
Posted on 2/25/15 at 6:13 pm to CockInYourEar
uf used to have the best wr's in the country every yr under spurrier
hard to believe now huh?
hard to believe now huh?
Posted on 2/25/15 at 6:17 pm to SwampyLSU
we've had this problem at fla lately
les is lucky as hell he wins because the QB situation at lsu over the last decade should probably get him fired if he ever has a 500 season
les is lucky as hell he wins because the QB situation at lsu over the last decade should probably get him fired if he ever has a 500 season
Posted on 2/25/15 at 7:10 pm to CockInYourEar
quote:
(SIDE NOTE) Schools with the WORST ratio of 4* or 5* commits divided by WR's drafted into the NFL.
Miss St - 4 - 4* or 5* WR's. 0 were drafted. 0% Bama - 16 4* or 5* WR's, 2 were Drafted. 12.5% Ole Miss - 11 4* or 5* WR's. 2 were Drafted. 18.2% Tenn - 15 4* or 5* WR's. 4 were Drafted. 26.6%
Well, if you are using an efficiency standard, Vandy wins hands down.
1- 4* recruit, 2 drafted...
4-1st team SEC (tied first),
1 AP All American (behind only Bama)
That is the problem with that analysis. I agree that recruit stars shouldn't matter. The only thing that matters for "____ position U" is draft picks. Really, that should be the only criteria, but they should weight the picks based on round taken.
Posted on 2/25/15 at 8:11 pm to Prof
quote:
the article said 1. lsu. 2. tenn 3. sc
Yep, but his formula is not valid. SC had more 1st Team All SEC and more WR's drafted than Tenn, so why should Tenn be ranked higher? According to his formula, it would be b/c they had more 4 and 5 * WR recruits.
My point is that the # of 4 or 5 *'s shouldn't matter.
Posted on 2/25/15 at 8:13 pm to CockInYourEar
Even without looking at recruiting, LSU is scored higher than USCe.
Page 2 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News