Started By
Message
re: Did You Know....
Posted on 5/10/17 at 11:26 pm to RamboMizzou
Posted on 5/10/17 at 11:26 pm to RamboMizzou
Your vernacular is on point. Very cutting edge
0
Posted on 5/10/17 at 11:26 pm to RamboMizzou
Did you Know . . .
whining about "random facts" is a cowards way of thanking someone for correcting your poor grammar.
Well what have you done lately? LSU has been better than Missouri over the past football season. See, I can pull time periods out that make LSU look good too. Let's go further back than 5 years.
Did you know, that over the last 15 years, Missouri has won 118 games while LSU has won 150?
Did you know, that over the last 25 years, Missouri has won 161 games while LSU has won 212?
whining about "random facts" is a cowards way of thanking someone for correcting your poor grammar.
quote:
we have been a better program than LSU since expansion?
Well what have you done lately? LSU has been better than Missouri over the past football season. See, I can pull time periods out that make LSU look good too. Let's go further back than 5 years.
Did you know, that over the last 15 years, Missouri has won 118 games while LSU has won 150?
Did you know, that over the last 25 years, Missouri has won 161 games while LSU has won 212?
Posted on 5/10/17 at 11:26 pm to America1776
I've been to more Yankees games than you've been to LSU games, and I have two degrees from UA. This thread isn't about my fanhood. It's about how LSU has allowed Missouri to become more relevant in the SEC.
Now, back to the original question. How many times has LSU finished in the Top 5 since expansion?
Now, back to the original question. How many times has LSU finished in the Top 5 since expansion?
Posted on 5/10/17 at 11:27 pm to Tuscaloosa
lol I love that you felt the need to defend your fanhood on a message board.
It was just a lil joke. No need to overcompensate and have a meltdown
It was just a lil joke. No need to overcompensate and have a meltdown
Posted on 5/10/17 at 11:28 pm to America1776
Man oh man. I don't know why this topic bothers you so much.
Posted on 5/10/17 at 11:28 pm to bbrownso
We no football until expansion.
Posted on 5/10/17 at 11:29 pm to Tuscaloosa
"I've been to more Yankees games than you've been to LSU games"
How hard did you stomp your foot after typing this?
How hard did you stomp your foot after typing this?
Posted on 5/10/17 at 11:29 pm to America1776
That was after I deleted the rest of the paragraph detailing my fanhood. You're lucky I didn't post it. Would have gotten you real good.
Posted on 5/10/17 at 11:30 pm to America1776
Probably about as hard as your mind has been trying to grasp and understand the pure relevancy Mizzou has over LSU since expansion.
Posted on 5/10/17 at 11:30 pm to America1776
Why are you avoiding answering the question I've asked you directly multiple times?
Posted on 5/10/17 at 11:30 pm to Tuscaloosa
"I don't know"
You could probably save a lot of time by starting every post of yours like this. Seems to be a common thing with you.
You could probably save a lot of time by starting every post of yours like this. Seems to be a common thing with you.
Posted on 5/10/17 at 11:31 pm to Tuscaloosa
I answered it on the last page... surely one of your degrees (FROM ALABAMA @EVERYBODY!!) required reading comprehension?
Posted on 5/10/17 at 11:35 pm to America1776
Did you? Did you really? Let's be honest with each other here, 1776 (can I call you that?)
I'm not really sure we've gotten an actual answer. I'm just looking for a number is all. You know I don't math good.
I'm not really sure we've gotten an actual answer. I'm just looking for a number is all. You know I don't math good.
Posted on 5/10/17 at 11:35 pm to Tuscaloosa
quote:
It's about how LSU has allowed Missouri to become more relevant in the SEC.
HTF has LSU "allowed" a team they've played once in 5 years to be more relevant? That makes no damn sense. What was LSU supposed to do? Not recruit players from states that have other SEC teams so they MIGHT get the players and perform better against Missouri?
But hey, we get to play them 2 in a 12 year period. I guess, shame on us for not playing them more.
Posted on 5/10/17 at 11:37 pm to RamboMizzou
quote:
We no football until expansion.
That's funny. It looks like Missouri football goes back 115 years with an inaugural record of 1-6-1.
Posted on 5/10/17 at 11:38 pm to Tuscaloosa
I prefer America, the Great and Powerful...
But I definitely gave a number? Maybe you're not looking at the correct post?
But I definitely gave a number? Maybe you're not looking at the correct post?
This post was edited on 5/10/17 at 11:39 pm
Posted on 5/10/17 at 11:42 pm to bbrownso
quote:
HTF has LSU "allowed" a team they've played once in 5 years to be more relevant? That makes no damn sense. What was LSU supposed to do? Not recruit players from states that have other SEC teams so they MIGHT get the players and perform better against Missouri?
But hey, we get to play them 2 in a 12 year period. I guess, shame on us for not playing them more.
Hey friend, you may be misunderstanding. LSU isn't personally responsible for Missouri's becoming more relevant, but rather indirectly responsible due to their own lack of achievement. While Missouri has been raking in division titles and 11+ win seasons, LSU has been riding the short bus.
Posted on 5/10/17 at 11:44 pm to Tuscaloosa
Tusc.. im interested in how bad of condition this short bus you mention is in..
Is it driven by YAW YAW?
Is it driven by YAW YAW?
Posted on 5/10/17 at 11:46 pm to RamboMizzou
It's driven by Yaw Yaw but he thinks it's a Hummer.
Posted on 5/10/17 at 11:47 pm to Tuscaloosa
If you don't like the yaw yaw hummer commercial... I don't even know
Page 3 of 4
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News