Started By
Message

re: Did joining the SEC really help A&M as much as people say?

Posted on 2/11/13 at 6:23 pm to
Posted by thefloydian
Member since Dec 2012
4771 posts
Posted on 2/11/13 at 6:23 pm to
You say you had a bad secondary, but I think you would have easily outscored everyone in the Big 12. None of those teams would have been able to stop Manziel.
Posted by TbirdSpur2010
ALAMO CITY
Member since Dec 2010
134026 posts
Posted on 2/11/13 at 6:25 pm to
quote:

I still refuse to rewatch any part of that game and that play in particular.


You know you take sports too seriously when you can't do that. Can't even think about that night without it being painful. The 2012 season was EXACTLY the salve our program and fanbase needed to start to heal that wound. Sounds hyperbolic, but it's the damn truth.
Posted by TbirdSpur2010
ALAMO CITY
Member since Dec 2010
134026 posts
Posted on 2/11/13 at 6:28 pm to
quote:

You say you had a bad secondary, but I think you would have easily outscored everyone in the Big 12.


You don't understand--our secondary was HORRIBLE. Like, consistently giving up 3rd and 15-20+ horrible. The A&M secondary you saw this year was light years ahead under DC Mark Snyder than they were under our former DC DeRuyter. Not to toot our own horn, but unless you'd followed our program, it's really hard to grasp just how dramatic our overall team improvement was from '11 to '12, and the new coaching staff was HUGE in bringing about that change.
Posted by thefloydian
Member since Dec 2012
4771 posts
Posted on 2/11/13 at 6:30 pm to
quote:

You don't understand--our secondary was HORRIBLE. Like, consistently giving up 3rd and 15-20+ horrible. The A&M secondary you saw this year was light years ahead under DC Mark Snyder than they were under our former DC DeRuyter. Not to toot our own horn, but unless you'd followed our program, it's really hard to grasp just how dramatic our overall team improvement was from '11 to '12, and the new coaching staff was HUGE in bringing about that change.



I thought we were talking about 2012.
Posted by Agforlife
Somewhere in the Brazos Valley
Member since Nov 2012
20102 posts
Posted on 2/11/13 at 6:30 pm to
Possibly but our defense was made stouter by playing much tougher SEC offenses as was shown when we played OU. It looked to me like there were plays that Stoops called expecting a soft front and found that ours was not and that is thanks to playing big physical lines most every game.
Posted by WestCoastAg
Member since Oct 2012
145139 posts
Posted on 2/11/13 at 6:30 pm to
While i agree for the most part. I just dont think you can go 12-0 and have to rely on purely out scoring week in and week out. Somewhere down the line you would need your d to make a stop and i just dont have confidence that this years secondary could have done that in a pass dominant conference
This post was edited on 2/11/13 at 6:32 pm
Posted by TbirdSpur2010
ALAMO CITY
Member since Dec 2010
134026 posts
Posted on 2/11/13 at 6:33 pm to
quote:

I thought we were talking about 2012.


My point is, nearly everything good that came out of 2012 started and ended with the coaching staff. And that coaching staff almost certainly isn't here if A&M stayed in the big12. I think it's safe to say that the Ags wouldn't have had near the same success in the big12 given those circumstances. JMO, though.
Posted by TeLeFaWx
Dallas, TX
Member since Aug 2011
29179 posts
Posted on 2/11/13 at 6:35 pm to
Biggest reason it helped us is year one was our defensive personnel being used to pass happy, the having to be run heavy. We probably had the most versatility scheme/experience wise of any team team in the country. Making the Belldozer our bitch, to picking off AJ McCryon twice are two examples of such. Our defensive guys had experience in both the best pass and the best run leagues. No other team outside of Mizzou could say that, but Mizzou had no talent.

Otherwise, the only thing you can really point to is that iron sharpens iron. It's only one year. Mocing forward the advantages are obvious and numerous.
Posted by thefloydian
Member since Dec 2012
4771 posts
Posted on 2/11/13 at 6:36 pm to
quote:

And that coaching staff almost certainly isn't here if A&M stayed in the big12


This seems to be a point of contention among aTm fans.
Posted by Mizzeaux
Worshington
Member since Jun 2012
13894 posts
Posted on 2/11/13 at 6:39 pm to
We had some talent, we just couldn't put the points on the board with our QB being hurt constantly.

Weren't going to be world killers, which most wouldn't admit at the begining, but this season could have gone the other way (bowl game, couple decent wins) easily.

That being said, I still stand behind my initial statements. aTm and Mizzou are Big 12 teams playing in the SEC for the last and the next 1-2 years until the SEC effect starts coming into play. For Mizzou, it will likely take a new coach, but I'm sure aTm is in a similar situation as it currently is if the move hadn't happened.
Posted by TbirdSpur2010
ALAMO CITY
Member since Dec 2010
134026 posts
Posted on 2/11/13 at 6:41 pm to
quote:

This seems to be a point of contention among aTm fans.


Let's put it this way, then: the moment A&M's move to the SEC became official, the 2011 season became an unofficial audition for Coach Sherman and his staff. They entered the season ranked in the preseason top 10 coming off a great 2010 campaign. If they had capitalized on that, they're most likely still here--no one could justify firing that staff if, say, they'd tied for the big 12 title.

Every time they stubbed their toe in 2011 was a nail in the coffin, though. And, at the risk of mixing my metaphors, the way in which the texas game was lost was the straw that broke the camel's back. Sherman's reluctance to embrace the SEC move could have been overlooked. His team's 2011 performances were the harbinger of change, IMO.
Posted by John Maplethorpe
Graubünden, Switzerland
Member since Jun 2010
889 posts
Posted on 2/11/13 at 6:44 pm to
If A&M would have stayed, they would have had K State, and Oklahoma at home, late in the year. Good chance they would have been undefeated. The conference RPI would have pushed them over Notre Dame.
Posted by cardboardboxer
Member since Apr 2012
34330 posts
Posted on 2/11/13 at 6:50 pm to
The SEC helped A&M a ton. Our brand was a mess before the move, but now it is much clearer.

Without playing Bama and winning JFF doesn't win the Heisman and we don't get a top ten class.

We are building a program not a one hit wonder, which we could never do in the Big 12.

I mean look at OSU and their recruiting class a year after almost going to the title game. Just winning the Big 12 isn't enough.
Posted by CGSC Lobotomy
Member since Sep 2011
80096 posts
Posted on 2/11/13 at 6:57 pm to
quote:

meanwhile, mack brown has worn his welcome out in many high school recruits minds.


The veiled threat he made towards coaches after signing day sure hasn't helped either.
Posted by Cincinnati Bowtie
Sparta
Member since May 2008
11951 posts
Posted on 2/11/13 at 7:03 pm to
Well, they lost to the two best teams they played this past year, but the future is pretty bright.
This post was edited on 2/11/13 at 7:04 pm
Posted by Grizzly
Member since Oct 2012
1776 posts
Posted on 2/11/13 at 7:44 pm to
Of course coming to the SEC has/will help Texas aTm.
I will post this again and it's quite simple. Many kids know the best conference to play in is the SEC. With that said the majority of Texas kids don't like to leave state. Texas aTm will now be the destination for many top ranked kids wanting to play in the best conference. This will only improve with time.


I believe Texas aTm will be a school to reckon with on a yearly basis as their talent pool will only get better due to their move to the SEC.
Posted by Cheese Grits
Wherever I lay my hat is my home
Member since Apr 2012
54655 posts
Posted on 2/11/13 at 7:54 pm to
What the SEC really did for TAMU this year was exposure. In the past you could not find a TAMU game on the TV as the content not chewed up by Texas, Oklahoma, and Kansas was just not there. This season TAMU could be found early on on TV even before the Johnny Football thing really got going. SEC media exposure shines on all SEC teams and that really helped TAMU.
Posted by townestoldme2
Austin, TX
Member since Sep 2012
499 posts
Posted on 2/11/13 at 8:04 pm to
It is literally the second best thing to ever happen to our school. First, admitting women.

Posted by cramps
Member since Oct 2012
2085 posts
Posted on 2/11/13 at 8:32 pm to
quote:

getting rid of sherman, the old man with no charisma, and adding sumlin was huge and would have been just as huge in teh big 12. ditto with jff. jff was the luckiest thing to ever happen to a&m, the guy was spurned by tejas. meanwhile, mack brown has worn his welcome out in many high school recruits minds.


You're not giving A&M enough credit here. I won't say Johnny would've attended A&M had Mack offered him as a QB, but I expected great things from him after watching him tear it up in HS. The kid was unstoppable, so I'd say plenty programs were dumb for not giving him more attention.

I'm not sure any team lately has experienced the kick in the nuts the 2011 season was, and it motivated the players to not have a repeat performance. It was one unbelievable choke job after the next, which is why Sherman was canned - not because of the loss to the horns. That's partly why Aggies seem so overzealous on here. It has been night and day between the two seasons.

Plenty Ags and A&M fans had their eye on Sumlin, myself included, since he left 10 years ago, and thankfully certain alumni had the pull to get him hired before it was too late. The man knows how to assemble and manage a staff, and bringing a member of the Wrecking Crew to whip the boys into shape was the biggest change in the team's performance this year.

The SEC has helped A&M, that's for certain. I think the main ways it has helped is by re-energizing the fanbase and increasing revenue through ticket and merchandise sales, as well as just making the players tougher, even in a "down" year by normal SEC West standards. The arrogance shown by SEC folks at the media days provided plenty motivation as well, so thanks for that. People forget that until just a few years ago, the Big 12 South was consistently one of the toughest divisions to win in CFB.

I left out the obvious part about recruiting, which has been mentioned plenty. Before, A&M was just another fish in big but crowded pond and nothing to set itself apart on the trail while being surrounded by the likes of Texas, OU, LSU, etc. That was the biggest change, and we'll see how well it pays off starting this season.
This post was edited on 2/11/13 at 8:44 pm
Posted by thefloydian
Member since Dec 2012
4771 posts
Posted on 2/11/13 at 8:35 pm to
quote:

The veiled threat he made towards coaches after signing day sure hasn't helped either.


What did he say?
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter