Started By
Message

re: Dammit...I'm still pissed about last night

Posted on 9/18/16 at 11:38 am to
Posted by SCDawg
Spartanburg, Sc
Member since Feb 2016
2499 posts
Posted on 9/18/16 at 11:38 am to
Dawgsessed
Posted by David Ricky
Hailing From Parts Unknown
Member since Sep 2015
24205 posts
Posted on 9/18/16 at 11:39 am to
Lol I would be livid too. Should've ran the ball and took the 3 instead of trying to get cute. There's no way Georgia would've scored twice imo.

Then the collapse on 4th down followed by your receiver inexplicably dropping the ball when you had plenty of time to get in FG range.
Posted by DrewDawg13
Athens
Member since Apr 2015
3494 posts
Posted on 9/18/16 at 11:40 am to
The best part of the Mizzou melt is that they are just the first of many that this guy is gonna piss off.





Posted by MizzouTrue
Member since Jun 2016
3841 posts
Posted on 9/18/16 at 11:42 am to
Georgia was the better team. They were better going in and coming out

I was surprised we even had the lead late
Posted by dcbl
Good guys wear white hats.
Member since Sep 2013
29665 posts
Posted on 9/18/16 at 11:42 am to
quote:

Mizzou was FAR better than Georgia. No debate. Our coach fricked up.


no, or you would have put the game away

they did look pretty equal though

kick a field goal instead of throw a pick & y'all win

I understand your frustration at seeing your QB handcuffed; but a deep pass was what killed you

the way the game was going, getting a 2 score lead would have iced the game

I will not argue that we escaped with a very fortunate win; but saying that Mizzou was "far better" is a huge stretch and not at all accurate
Posted by jledet
Panhandle
Member since Jan 2008
4922 posts
Posted on 9/18/16 at 11:44 am to
Can't wait to see what coach fuggs it up more when yall come to baton rouge
Posted by athens-ga
athens, ga
Member since Jun 2013
1298 posts
Posted on 9/18/16 at 11:45 am to
quote:

No, Mizzou was the better team. Period. But the better team sometimes loses.


joke post? to call either team better is a stretch to say the least. I'd say uga was less terrible?
Posted by mizzoukills
Member since Aug 2011
40686 posts
Posted on 9/18/16 at 12:04 pm to
If Mizzou had simply attempted to be as agressive on offense as they were in the first half, Mizzou would've won by 3 touchdowns.
Posted by DawgsLife
Member since Jun 2013
58905 posts
Posted on 9/18/16 at 12:06 pm to
quote:

Georgia was the better team. They were better going in and coming out

I was surprised we even had the lead late




I gotta tell you....I was impressed by Mizzou. Your DL was very solid. Lock looked completely different this year compared to last. More relaxed, confident. And your WRs played a really good game. I think you hurt somebody's shot at the East championship.
Posted by CNB
Columbia, SC
Member since Sep 2007
95882 posts
Posted on 9/18/16 at 12:06 pm to
Or if they didn't have 5 turnovers...
Posted by Dawgfanman
Member since Jun 2015
22252 posts
Posted on 9/18/16 at 12:06 pm to
quote:

If Mizzou had simply attempted to be as agressive on offense as they were in the first half, Mizzou would've won by 3 touchdowns.

You'd have thrown 6-7 interceptions. Your QB was befuddled for last 2 qtrs
Posted by GurleyGirl
Georgia
Member since Nov 2015
13164 posts
Posted on 9/18/16 at 12:07 pm to
quote:

mizzoukills


Melt day 2.
Posted by PygmalionEffect
Member since Jul 2012
4834 posts
Posted on 9/18/16 at 12:08 pm to
quote:

If Mizzou had simply attempted to be as agressive on offense as they were in the first half, Mizzou would've won by 3 touchdowns.



If you could shite solid gold eggs out of your arse you'd be a rich man.
Posted by reedus23
St. Louis
Member since Sep 2011
25485 posts
Posted on 9/18/16 at 12:16 pm to
quote:

Once we went to 2 deep amd mixed zone coverages your QB was shite.You had no choice to run the ball because he was going to throw yet another pick.


Changing it up was A factor, not THE factor. First pass of the 2nd half was a TD. After that, the play calling completely changed. Not because Lock threw an INT because he hadn't thrown any yet. Having said that, once we were throwing on 3rd down, whether it was the coverages or Lock focusing too much on Moore or Lock trying to simply do too much, what UGA did was successful.
Posted by mizzoukills
Member since Aug 2011
40686 posts
Posted on 9/18/16 at 12:22 pm to
Exactly, Reedus
Posted by LewDawg
Member since May 2009
75242 posts
Posted on 9/18/16 at 12:23 pm to
I like this new thing you're doing. Keep it up
Posted by rockytop627
Member since Jan 2014
10041 posts
Posted on 9/18/16 at 12:37 pm to
quote:

You never play to not lose. You play to win. Playing not to lose starting in the late 3rd is asinine when you're only up 6 points. We were playing like we were up 2 or 3 touchdowns


Butchball 101
Posted by Number 31
St. Tammany
Member since Jul 2016
4178 posts
Posted on 9/18/16 at 12:38 pm to
Y'all turned it over five times and still only lost by one point on a 4th down TD.

IMO, Mizzou is about what we thought they would be with the exception of a potentially explosive if mistake-prone offense (as opposed to last year's absence of any semblance of offense).

Georgia though doesn't look like they belong anywhere near the top-25. I think that will change as their QB matures and their RBs start to get healthy.
Posted by SummerOfGeorge
Member since Jul 2013
102699 posts
Posted on 9/18/16 at 12:42 pm to
quote:

Our coach fricked up.


WiBo though
Posted by SidewalkDawg
Chair
Member since Nov 2012
9820 posts
Posted on 9/18/16 at 12:44 pm to
quote:

If... would've...


Yep, pretty much sums it up.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter