Started By
Message

re: Current enrollment numbers for SEC Schools

Posted on 6/21/16 at 11:22 pm to
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
260293 posts
Posted on 6/21/16 at 11:22 pm to
60k? Damn. College used to be special. Guess anyone can get in now.
Posted by texashorn
Member since May 2008
13122 posts
Posted on 6/21/16 at 11:22 pm to
Seems like aggy, who counters factual arguments with anger and namecalling while expressing a desire for the fact-poster to leave, are the "whiny bitches."
Posted by FishFearMe
United States
Member since Jul 2015
7196 posts
Posted on 6/21/16 at 11:23 pm to
frick that diploma mill shite.

I attended both a highly regarded private university as well as Texas A&M.

The classes at Texas A&M were more rigorous.

The Professors at Texas A&M are glad to weed out the weaker students.

Posted by KSGamecock
The Woodlands, TX
Member since May 2012
22982 posts
Posted on 6/21/16 at 11:23 pm to
Yeap, it's causing a huge devaluation of the Bachelor's Degree.
Posted by texashorn
Member since May 2008
13122 posts
Posted on 6/21/16 at 11:25 pm to
quote:

I attended both a highly regarded private university as well as Texas A&M.

When? In the late 1970s? Get out of here with that weak shite. Things have changed, Grandpa.
Posted by STRIPES
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2003
4771 posts
Posted on 6/21/16 at 11:27 pm to
Texas A&M----61,642
Florida----49,459
Alabama----36,047
Missouri----35,425
Georgia----35,197
S. Carolina---32,971
LSU----45,202*
Tennessee----30,386
Kentucky----29,203
Arkansas----26,237
Auburn----25,912
Ole Miss---22,503
Miss State---20,138
Vanderbilt----12,686

*LSU system total including 2 Med Schools(NO & Shreveport), Dental School (NO), the Vet School (BR), and 3 satellite campuses in Eunice, Shreveport, and Alexandria.

Law School (BR) numbers are included with the 31,000 already.
Posted by Mister Tee
On the Lake
Member since Jun 2014
2761 posts
Posted on 6/21/16 at 11:44 pm to
I understand a little better now, but what "qualifies" the 10% in the Texas educational system to even go to College in the first place?

Are they ready for that in the first place? Texas is a large and complex State to begin with, with a huge population. Don't actual test scores play any part in this or just GPA's from high school. It seems slightly corrupt.

Any State High Schools in this Country can inflate what they deem a "Top 10%".

College Entrance Exams should take care of that to begin with.

It should be HARD to get into college. For a reason.

I would side with the University of Texas right now on your decision. A University's main function is to provide the best possible education to the most deserving...not the most accepted. Glad you initiated a Cap in this regard.

Posted by KTownRebel
Kennesaw, GA
Member since Oct 2014
2854 posts
Posted on 6/22/16 at 1:19 am to
61k....Why would anyone want to have that many people in one school and town. frick that. I went to a school with like 15,000 and it was retarded bobbing and weaving through crowds around campus
Posted by texashorn
Member since May 2008
13122 posts
Posted on 6/22/16 at 1:30 am to
quote:

I understand a little better now, but what "qualifies" the 10% in the Texas educational system to even go to College in the first place?

Are they ready for that in the first place?

Many of them are not, and fail out.

Many require remedial courses. I have yet to nail down whether UT Austin and Texas A&M and offering remedial courses on campus. If that is the case, it is a disgrace.

None of that matters to aggy. They want to grow the aggy cult and that means running students through College Station like cattle.

Many aggies do not want the College Station campus to become an elite institution, because that would be too much like "t.u."

It's a cultural mindset (UT) against an agricultural mindset (A&M). Aggy doesn't give one rat's arse about national rankings from what they perceive to be pointy-headed elites.
Posted by randomways
North Carolina
Member since Aug 2013
12988 posts
Posted on 6/22/16 at 1:31 am to
quote:

Yeap, it's causing a huge devaluation of the Bachelor's Degree.


You're mixing up cause and effect. The devaluation of the Bachelor's is a product of the greater insistence on it (or its vocational equivalent) as a minimum prerequisite for most upwardly mobile professions. It's an important distinction (and not just because of the irony of devaluation being created by greater valuation.) This creates a greater demand, which, in turn, spurs institutions of higher education to accommodate them in the name of greater profits. Big schools are taking in more students because more people are desperate to become students in order to gain even a introductory foothold in the job market.

I have a couple teacher friends who went to college to become teachers (as opposed to took teaching jobs in lieu of some other profession.) They both had their Master's degree before they even applied for a teaching job, and both were in their fields, not education. Twenty years ago, that would have been much rarer than it is today because the basic expectations for employability have risen sharply.
Posted by Mister Tee
On the Lake
Member since Jun 2014
2761 posts
Posted on 6/22/16 at 2:22 am to
I don't ever remember Auburn offering remedial courses to me or any of my fellow classmates.

I went into one of my Engineering classes without my book one morning (left it in my car in a rush) and I was asked to leave the class...and I did so out of respect.

I was also locked out of the classroom because I was late one morning. My professor literally closed and locked the door at 8 a.m. and I arrived at 8:13 because traffic was bad. I had no other option but to leave.

I hated those particular circumstances and professors in those rare moments, but looking back I now really respect their policies.

Maybe it is just how small our Engineering College was back then, though. But there was a level of respect for your education.

I can't speak for larger Universities.

Even so, maybe it is not best to get so large in any capacity regarding your own particular Universities.

Small classrooms with World-Class professors and equally strong-minded students is a great mix.

You guys are really getting too large. There is no way that you can adequately teach classes of more than 30-40 students right now without the professor having to hand out scan-trons and hoping for the best.

That is not an education.

Posted by AggieMan2005
Texas
Member since Jun 2016
149 posts
Posted on 6/22/16 at 3:41 am to
Universities are based on research funding mainly

The amount of research has only increased at A&M
over the years in many academic disciplines

Posted by G2160
houston
Member since May 2013
1750 posts
Posted on 6/22/16 at 4:08 am to
Maybe one day a&m can have an engineering program as good as auburn's.

Lol
Posted by cjohn
Georgia
Member since Aug 2014
859 posts
Posted on 6/22/16 at 7:50 am to
quote:

Mister Tee
Current enrollment numbers for SEC Schools
I understand a little better now, but what "qualifies" the 10% in the Texas educational system to even go to College in the first place?


In Texas it is the top 10% rank in your class by GPA. So if you are the 12 percentile guy in a top public school in Texas you are S.O.L. If you are 5th percentile in the worst school in Texas, you get automatic admission to A&M or Texas (or any of the state schools).

The "embracing of the 10% rule" deal that the Horn fan talks about isn't totally embraced. There is a conflict within the administration. There are two sides. One side is like the Texas guys. They want to curb admission and improve academics. The support in the article linked above cites the ability to recruit minority students as one of the main reasons to keep the 10% rule. The other side could be termed the "land grant" side, who feel the university should be available to any student who wants to attend.

It is a complex matter for the university. The fact that the state just spent 10 years with a governor who was pro 10% and appointed BOR members with such views hasn't helped the situation.

Personally, the growth numbers are alarming to me. I wish the university would develop the system schools and encourage attendance in those. Maybe kind of a hybrid of what Texas has. Maybe just accept top 5% to the main campus and the next 5% can get into the main campus after completing 2 years at one of the system schools if they meet certain criteria. Something like that would go a long way in addressing both issues.
This post was edited on 6/22/16 at 8:05 am
Posted by lestertheghost
Member since Mar 2016
436 posts
Posted on 6/22/16 at 11:47 am to
aTm research numbers are so high because aTm stuffs 8-9 other campuses and health science centers into the College Station Numbers

UT has around $2.5 Billion in research system wide, and should top $3 Billion with the new medical centers, but lets other campuses and health science centers stand on their own
This post was edited on 6/22/16 at 12:08 pm
Jump to page
Page First 8 9 10
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 10 of 10Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter