Started By
Message
re: Controversy Regarding Kiffin's Visor from TSIO?
Posted on 11/11/14 at 2:50 pm to Vandyrone
Posted on 11/11/14 at 2:50 pm to Vandyrone
That theory doesn't quite make sense either if you know Hyams. Why would Hyams write a story about a visor he thought would rustle fans (he's the opposite of a rustler) when he's never been known to do anything like that, quite the opposite? Too much time has passed since the game for it to even be a human interest story. Now if it were John Adams who lives to stir-shite and intentionally rustle for clicks it would make sense but again Hyams is the complete opposite (dull even).
Maybe the story is about security trying to take it back or being overly aggressive? I still can't see that being a can of worms.
Maybe the story is about security trying to take it back or being overly aggressive? I still can't see that being a can of worms.
0
Posted on 11/11/14 at 2:51 pm to Prof
The Montgomery article quotes the dad saying that she is 7 years old. Kiffin didn't become the coach until the end of 2008. The dates don't match up if that is what you or JH are insinuating.
Posted on 11/11/14 at 2:52 pm to jbond
quote:
If y'all were actually good at football you wouldn't have to look to bullshite melodrama for entertainment.
I know you're black but I will fight you irl, meet me at the Sonic at 6 pm
Posted on 11/11/14 at 2:53 pm to Vols&Shaft83
quote:
I know you're black
Hahahahahah what the frick?
Posted on 11/11/14 at 2:56 pm to Prof
Paternity testing? You don't need an article of his clothing. Have a judge order a paternity test for frick's sake.
Posted on 11/11/14 at 2:57 pm to Chili Davis
quote:
The Montgomery article quotes the dad saying that she is 7 years old. Kiffin didn't become the coach until the end of 2008. The dates don't match up if that is what you or JH are insinuating.
Neither of us are insinuating anything. Again that was speculation - not my own or his but rather simple speculation going around in response to the tweet. Had I known folks would think that was my theory instead of understanding that when I said that I didn't know what was going and 'your guess is as good as mine' that I was simply presenting the tweet and the current speculation by others I'd never have included said speculation.
I included it solely because that is the speculation that occurred in response to the tweet. IOW, I reported the speculation.
Given what I know of Hyams and how unlike him this is, I'm genuinely curious as to what the tweet is about.
Posted on 11/11/14 at 2:57 pm to Prof
Posted on 11/11/14 at 2:58 pm to Prof
My head...
Posted on 11/11/14 at 3:01 pm to Prof
Prof does love him some soap opera. 
Posted on 11/11/14 at 3:01 pm to 1BIGTigerFan
Damn it
I was enjoying the coed/car wreck/pregnant story line
I was enjoying the coed/car wreck/pregnant story line
Posted on 11/11/14 at 3:02 pm to Vandyrone
quote:
Prof does love him some soap opera.
Um no. I presented a tweet that I find weird and stated as much in the very first line of the post "and now for some weirdness."
This post was edited on 11/11/14 at 3:04 pm
Posted on 11/11/14 at 3:05 pm to Prof
quote:
Neither of us are insinuating anything. Again that was speculation - not my own or his but rather simple speculation going around in response to the tweet. Had I known folks would think that was my theory instead of understanding that when I said that I didn't know what was going and 'your guess is as good as mine' that I was simply presenting the tweet and the current speculation by others I'd never have included said speculation. I included it solely because that is the speculation that occurred in response to the tweet. IOW, I reported the speculation. Given what I know of Hyams and how unlike him this is, I'm genuinely curious as to what the tweet is about.
It is weird that he is asking for the visor at this point. Maybe Hyams wants Lane's lucky visor?
Posted on 11/11/14 at 3:06 pm to Prof
The thing is, anyone with two brain cells to rub together knows that, if he's interested from a DNA standpoint, the visor is useless, because it can't be proven that Kiffin is the only one to wear the visor. If there's a legitimate reason for someone to get Kiffin's DNA, you go get a court order.
Posted on 11/11/14 at 3:06 pm to Prof
quote:
I really don't know how a visor could possibly be a potential can of worms but there is some speculation about it out there involving his fondness for coeds in his time here and what that visor might provide or verify.
Who the hell isn't fond of coeds???
Posted on 11/11/14 at 3:07 pm to Chili Davis
quote:
It is weird that he is asking for the visor at this point. Maybe Hyams wants Lane's lucky visor?
Given how strange that tweet is who knows. Maybe that's the can of worms.
Posted on 11/11/14 at 3:08 pm to Prof
quote:
Um no. I presented a tweet that I find weird and stated as much in the very first line of the post "and now for some weirdness."
And knowing how slow Jimmy is to break a story, don't expect a conclusion to the soap opera until the spring.
Posted on 11/11/14 at 3:08 pm to PrivatePublic
quote:
Who the hell isn't fond of coeds???
This post was edited on 11/11/14 at 3:10 pm
Posted on 11/11/14 at 3:09 pm to Vandyrone
quote:
And knowing how slow Jimmy is to break a story, don't expect a conclusion to the soap opera until the spring.
For all we know, he's talking about a different TSIO.
Posted on 11/11/14 at 3:11 pm to Prof
quote:
For all we know, he's talking about a different TSIO.
Exactly.
Posted on 11/11/14 at 3:13 pm to BamaGradinTn
quote:
BamaGradinTn
Page 3 of 5
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News