Started By
Message
1
Posted on 8/21/16 at 6:49 am to Sid E Walker
Welp, bootycall now hates you 
Posted on 8/21/16 at 6:51 am to Pinche Cabron
:dontcaregif:
Posted on 8/21/16 at 7:00 am to Sid E Walker
This was found in bootycalls house
Posted on 8/21/16 at 7:04 am to justausedcarguy
quote:
I feel that there is a little "Saban" in us all.
Gay
Posted on 8/21/16 at 8:06 am to ToesOnTheNose213
I think Sam Darnold starting at QB would give SC a better chance at winning, but the odds for this game were never in our favor. If we win it'll be because we run the ball well, the defense and special teams play lights out, and we win the turnovers by +2 or better.
SC's schedule is the toughest in the country. Wouldn't have it any other way. Fight On!
SC's schedule is the toughest in the country. Wouldn't have it any other way. Fight On!
Posted on 8/21/16 at 11:07 am to Bootycall
I'm pretty sure not only have the Trojans sanctions expired but that the classes that were allowed the full 25 have experience. Three phases of probation:
The on going investigation and the damage it does as other coaches can tell recruits you're going on probation. Also the transfers u have. Usually 2 years.
The probation itself where u can't sign but half what other teams can. 2 years.
The recovery to not only get numbers back to 85 but have experience in the 85. Takes about 4 years after sanctions expire.
So in this situation, which was similar to ours, it takes 8 years to "fully" recover. I believe SC investigation started in 08? So they should be pretty salty now. 2009 was our first year to have 85 that had 25 seniors and 25 juniors. Sc should be good now. This is gonna be a struggle as SC recruits lineman like we do. If we were playing UCLA no problem but if a couple things go SC' s way....I'm just ready to get going.
The on going investigation and the damage it does as other coaches can tell recruits you're going on probation. Also the transfers u have. Usually 2 years.
The probation itself where u can't sign but half what other teams can. 2 years.
The recovery to not only get numbers back to 85 but have experience in the 85. Takes about 4 years after sanctions expire.
So in this situation, which was similar to ours, it takes 8 years to "fully" recover. I believe SC investigation started in 08? So they should be pretty salty now. 2009 was our first year to have 85 that had 25 seniors and 25 juniors. Sc should be good now. This is gonna be a struggle as SC recruits lineman like we do. If we were playing UCLA no problem but if a couple things go SC' s way....I'm just ready to get going.
Posted on 8/21/16 at 11:20 am to ToesOnTheNose213
Oh...i thought Peej had made a prediction or something like that
Posted on 8/21/16 at 12:45 pm to loweralabamatrojan
Yea - with a new, non running QB and a pro-style scheme, I expect USC to have trouble scoring points.
However, SC has playmakers on offense and defense. We'll have a new QB too, and if you guys make him make mistakes you can overcome the offensive issues.
I expect it to be a physical football game. Nobody is going to overlook USC.
However, SC has playmakers on offense and defense. We'll have a new QB too, and if you guys make him make mistakes you can overcome the offensive issues.
I expect it to be a physical football game. Nobody is going to overlook USC.
Posted on 8/21/16 at 12:49 pm to SummerOfGeorge
I think this game will be a lot closer than what people are expecting.
Alabama 27
USCw 23
Alabama 27
USCw 23
Posted on 8/21/16 at 12:53 pm to Nissanmaxima
The only way USC scores 23 points is if they score on special teams or turnovers. That's possible, though.
However - and I think USC is going to be pretty good - but their last 5 games year....
27-24 W @ Colorado (4-9)
48-28 L @ Oregon (9-4)
40-21 W vs UCLA (8-5)
41-22 L vs Stanford (12-2)
23-21 L vs Wisconsin (10-3)
That's incredibly bleh
However - and I think USC is going to be pretty good - but their last 5 games year....
27-24 W @ Colorado (4-9)
48-28 L @ Oregon (9-4)
40-21 W vs UCLA (8-5)
41-22 L vs Stanford (12-2)
23-21 L vs Wisconsin (10-3)
That's incredibly bleh
Posted on 8/21/16 at 1:10 pm to SummerOfGeorge
SC by 17
Rodo
Rodo
Posted on 8/21/16 at 1:32 pm to Grim
Grim
You are what you eat
You are what you eat
Posted on 8/21/16 at 1:57 pm to Rodo
quote:
SC by 17
Just 17? I've been saying 30 all summer.
Posted on 8/21/16 at 2:16 pm to loweralabamatrojan
quote:
If we win it'll be because we run the ball well,
quote:
If we win it'll be because we run the ball well,
You're going to lose, then.
Posted on 8/21/16 at 3:14 pm to ToesOnTheNose213
quote:
"All yall athiests think your so smart just like my nephew he doesnt believe in God but he sure believes in pokeman and video games. You'll see how smart you are on judgement day..."
Pardon me when I can't take anything you say seriously. You calling me a pussy is a compliment.
Is there something I missed?
Posted on 8/21/16 at 4:34 pm to ToesOnTheNose213
Not to mention the death of Harry Gilmore which will become a focal rally point to draw the team closer. The grief will create a close team and that might help with the pain the players are obviously suffering.
Posted on 8/21/16 at 5:08 pm to ToesOnTheNose213
Max Browne is a RS Junior and was the top QB recruit in the nation. Why are you looking at this as a bad thing? USC is loaded with talent and could easily beat Bama if our new QB is rusty.
Posted on 8/21/16 at 5:49 pm to ToesOnTheNose213
Don't be silly. It never mattered who was named the starter.
Posted on 8/21/16 at 6:01 pm to sunseeker
At least one SCw fan already has his excuse ready. Prepare to be embarrassingly humbled SCw fans. No excuses necessary.
Page 2 of 3
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News