Started By
Message
re: Can we stop trying to rearrange the divisions and just admit that 6-0-2>>>6-1-1?
Posted on 4/30/14 at 4:35 pm to TheSandman
Posted on 4/30/14 at 4:35 pm to TheSandman
quote:
How about you give up the Clemson game so we can go to a 9-game SEC schedule?
0
Posted on 4/30/14 at 4:36 pm to Cockopotamus
quote:This has literally nothing to do with anything
If every other team had a strong OOC opponent then it wouldn't be an issue.
Posted on 4/30/14 at 4:38 pm to TheSandman
quote:
This has literally nothing to do with anything
Because everyone basically already does this
Posted on 4/30/14 at 4:40 pm to TheSandman
quote:
This has literally nothing to do with anything
When there are ooc schedules like Bama's last year, aTm's and Mizzou's, yes it does.
And besides, USC-Clemson is one of the longest consecutively played games in the nation. Its got more tradition than TSIO and DSOR
Posted on 4/30/14 at 4:41 pm to Cockopotamus
6-1-2
Posted on 4/30/14 at 4:42 pm to Cockopotamus
quote:
Its got more tradition
quote:
DSOR
quote:LOL
Deep South's Oldest Rivalry
quote:
TSIO
and incoming
Posted on 4/30/14 at 4:43 pm to Cockopotamus
quote:
When there are ooc schedules like Bama's last year, aTm's and Mizzou's, yes it does.
Bama played VA Tech last year, has played Michigan, Clemson, FSU, etc. each year over the past several years. Why do people forget/choose to ignore this?
Posted on 4/30/14 at 4:44 pm to Cockopotamus
quote:
When there are ooc schedules like Bama's last year,
We scheduled a team that was coming off a Sugar bowl appearance and has been one of the top 15 programs in the country the past decade. Colorado State won a bowl game
quote:
aTm's and Mizzou's
Schedules are in flux because of the conference change.
quote:
Its got more tradition than TSIO
Serious question: Are you a teenager?
Posted on 4/30/14 at 4:52 pm to TheSandman
quote:
How about you give up the Clemson game so we can go to a 9-game SEC schedule?
How does that sound?
I think they're required to play each other annually.
Posted on 4/30/14 at 4:56 pm to Cockopotamus
quote:
When there are ooc schedules like Bama's last year, aTm's and Mizzou's, yes it does.
And besides, USC-Clemson is one of the longest consecutively played games in the nation. Its got more tradition than TSIO and DSOR
Posted on 4/30/14 at 5:00 pm to Cockopotamus
quote:
When there are ooc schedules like Bama's last year, aTm's and Mizzou's, yes it does.
No it doesn't. We all know the new committee is going to take only one SEC team a year - the team that wins the SECCG.
Win the SECCG and you're in. Unless you completely shite the leg South Carolina style in OCC.
This post was edited on 4/30/14 at 5:02 pm
Posted on 4/30/14 at 5:06 pm to TheSandman
quote:
Florida, South Carolina, and Georgia are the three main obstacles in getting that schedule because they don't want to have to play nine SEC games + a strong OOC every year.
Pussies.
Posted on 4/30/14 at 5:34 pm to Cockopotamus
No the divisions and schedule format aren't the problem. It's fricking expansion! Kick out 2-4 teams and the problem is solved. I miss the good ole days.
Posted on 4/30/14 at 5:36 pm to TheSandman
quote:
Florida, South Carolina, and Georgia are the three main obstacles in getting that schedule because they don't want to have to play nine SEC games + a strong OOC every year.
Well that's not true. We want to be able to play OOC rival and another strong OOC game while still maintaining enough home games.
Posted on 4/30/14 at 5:38 pm to DecaturAU
Stop whining.
The entire country will be different, in terms of conferences, very soon.
Slive had the foresight to move early.
And I bet he does so again soon.
The entire country will be different, in terms of conferences, very soon.
Slive had the foresight to move early.
And I bet he does so again soon.
Posted on 4/30/14 at 5:44 pm to Cockopotamus
quote:
Its got more tradition than TSIO and DSOR
How many of those USC-Clemson games had national title implications attached to them? I'm going to go ahead and say zero.
Posted on 4/30/14 at 5:46 pm to RollTide1987
quote:
How many of those USC-Clemson games had national title implications attached to them? I'm going to go ahead and say zero.
I thought playing every year was what made tradition? Otherwise whats the big deal in not playing every year?
Posted on 4/30/14 at 5:53 pm to Cockopotamus
I'm actually at the point where I don't mind a 6-0-3 schedule if it meant LSU fans would quit their constant whining and bitching about Alabama and the SEC office.
I could live with playing Tennessee as a non conference game in years it isn't in the rotation. The only downside is that SEC scheduling would have to be figured out and settled several years out to even out the number of SEC home games for each team. That's one of the main downsides to a 9 game conference schedule.
I could live with playing Tennessee as a non conference game in years it isn't in the rotation. The only downside is that SEC scheduling would have to be figured out and settled several years out to even out the number of SEC home games for each team. That's one of the main downsides to a 9 game conference schedule.
This post was edited on 4/30/14 at 5:56 pm
Posted on 4/30/14 at 6:25 pm to Roger Klarvin
Silly ag...no experience being in a real conference, but always yapping about virtually any/all subjects. Y'all are still at the kiddie table, so please be quiet till you've actually accomplished something...lol
Posted on 4/30/14 at 6:32 pm to tickfawtiger
quote:
Silly ag...no experience being in a real conference, but always yapping about virtually any/all subjects. Y'all are still at the kiddie table, so please be quiet till you've actually accomplished something...lol
Page 2 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News