Started By
Message
re: Can anyone remind me how we took Missouri over Louisville again?
Posted on 3/23/13 at 6:54 pm to Breesus2Jimmy
Posted on 3/23/13 at 6:54 pm to Breesus2Jimmy
quote:
Should have added NC State over Mizzou.
Just another team that sucks in football and chokes in the first round of the NCAA tourney.
I don't see the upgrade.
3
Posted on 3/23/13 at 6:56 pm to DaleDenton
quote:
I don't see the upgrade.
Why upgrade the best?
Posted on 3/23/13 at 6:58 pm to DaleDenton
quote:
I don't see the upgrade.
It's not about upgrading anything, it's about markets.
Posted on 3/23/13 at 6:59 pm to CNB
quote:
Why upgrade the best?
Because Mizzou was suppose to boost the SEC in basketball and has been an epic fail thus far, but if you knew their history it wouldn't have come as a surprise.
Posted on 3/23/13 at 7:04 pm to DaleDenton
quote:
Because Mizzou was suppose to boost the SEC in basketball and has been an epic fail thus far, but if you knew their history it wouldn't have come as a surprise.
Um they competed in the SEC with a bunch of transfers and new players. If anything it makes the SEC looks bad because they competed in conference with basically a NEW team and went undefeated at home. Oh lets add in the blowouts in COMO. Slow your roll, you're making yourself look dumb.
How many SEC teams basically started from scratch and still made the NCAAt??? Most SEC teams had 5 or more returning players.
Posted on 3/23/13 at 7:06 pm to bayou2003
Arky home blowouts > Mizzou home blowouts
Posted on 3/23/13 at 7:06 pm to kywildcatfanone
quote:
It's not about upgrading anything, it's about markets.
Someone that supports a school in a state where LITTLE ROCK is their biggest city won't understand anything about MARKETS, POPULATION, etc.
The only thing most people know about Little Rock is the Little Rock 9 or whatever and Bill Clinton
This post was edited on 3/23/13 at 7:10 pm
Posted on 3/23/13 at 7:12 pm to bayou2003
quote:
Um they competed in the SEC with a bunch of transfers and new players. If anything it makes the SEC looks bad because they competed in conference with basically a NEW team and went undefeated at home. Oh lets add in the blowouts in COMO. Slow your roll, you're making yourself look dumb.
How many SEC teams basically started from scratch and still made the NCAAt??? Most SEC teams had 5 or more returning players.
Mizzou had final four talent this year, it may have came via mostly transfers but it was on the roster.
Posted on 3/23/13 at 7:36 pm to CNB
quote:
Can someone please tell me why we want a bunch of powerhouse tradition schools?
I kind of like the weak addition to beat up on.
Because I'd like to see FSU be in a real football conference for once. You don't feel the same way about Clemson?
Posted on 3/23/13 at 7:39 pm to DaleDenton
quote:
Kansas City and St. Louis TV sets, Mizzou lied and said they belong to them instead of Kansas and Illinois.
Takes a halfassed troll and takes it to the next level. Denton FTW.
Posted on 3/23/13 at 9:06 pm to reggierayreb
quote:
from the mouth of belles.......
I'll have you know he came up with that all on his own.
Posted on 3/23/13 at 9:10 pm to CtotheVrzrbck
You'd think someone would just keep the original, or even the 32nd thread of this nature afloat on the main page... but apparently some feel the need to make a new one daily.
Posted on 3/23/13 at 10:23 pm to mograyback
The Big12 chose TCU and WV over Louisville.
Posted on 3/23/13 at 11:05 pm to RocketBallz
Could someone tell me just how many SEC football and basketball championships that Arkansas has won since they joined the conference?
Posted on 3/23/13 at 11:08 pm to DaleDenton
quote:
Along with Arkansas', Carolina's, and Texas' if we have time.
Posted on 3/23/13 at 11:27 pm to SWMissouriTiger
0 Football
2 Basketball - 92, 94
Basketball won the SECT in 2000
2 Basketball - 92, 94
Basketball won the SECT in 2000
Posted on 3/24/13 at 12:21 am to DaleDenton
You are a tool also so I could see why you don't see the benefit
Posted on 3/24/13 at 12:25 am to CtotheVrzrbck
quote:
The one school per state argument is weak sauce.
Your stupid is showing.
Posted on 3/24/13 at 1:50 am to CtotheVrzrbck
quote:
The one school per state argument is weak sauce.
The SEC has been adding schools based on markets since at least 1992
Posted on 3/24/13 at 2:11 am to molsusports
UL? The commuter school? In the city that is nasty and dirty? With low academia? THAT school? You have to be kidding? Well...the SEC could get Papajohns as a sponsoring partner...but we have plenty of those. Hell...lets go after USF or UAB or some other commuter schools that accept any student with a heartbeat.
Page 3 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News