Started By
Message
0
Posted on 8/1/16 at 1:57 pm to Gradual_Stroke
aTm's elite receivers that y'all wouldn't trade for the world went 0-2 against Bama and Ole Miss last year 
Posted on 8/1/16 at 1:58 pm to texag7
quote:
I would not interchange any of our starters for any ole miss receiver.
Absolutely. That's the way it should be. I wouldn't trade any of our receivers for any receiver anywhere in the country. Your talent is only as good as your team's system allows them to be.
Auburn for instance...their fans like to say they have great receivers...and that may be true. But they clearly don't have anyone who can get them the ball reliably. If they did, they probably would have won the Arkansas game last year. If you listen to their fans, their QB was hitting their receivers in the hands all day long, but they couldn't catch a cold.
Based on all the evidence, I can only assume that their QB hitting their receivers in the hands is such a shock to them that they are taken by surprise and can't hold on to the ball. What good is it having a great receiver if he never catches the ball??
Posted on 8/1/16 at 1:59 pm to GnashRebel
% of catches vrs drops. Yds per catch.
You can't catch a football that's not thrown at you.
You can't catch a football that's not thrown at you.
Posted on 8/1/16 at 2:02 pm to Herman Frisco
quote:
You can't catch a football that's not thrown at you.
Brett Favre can. He has caught balls he has thrown to other people.
For touchdowns.
Posted on 8/1/16 at 2:14 pm to BoarEd
quote:
Auburn for instance...their fans like to say they have great receivers.
No we don't
this year we'll be playing two guys with very minimal experience and after that it'll likely be 4 freshman. 4 highly recruited freshman that could end up great... But nobody is lauding our WR group this yearThis post was edited on 8/1/16 at 3:24 pm
Posted on 8/1/16 at 2:21 pm to BowlJackson
nor were we lauding them last year.
Posted on 8/1/16 at 2:26 pm to SummerOfGeorge
LSU WR unit > Ole Miss WR unit
Posted on 8/1/16 at 2:28 pm to hg
quote:
LSU WR unit > Ole Miss WR unit
Yeah, I'm not sure how LSU was left off this list.
Posted on 8/1/16 at 2:28 pm to BowlJackson
quote:
No we don't
You just like to argue.
Posted on 8/1/16 at 2:29 pm to drewb808
It's because LSU doesn't have a QB on roster that doesn't suck donkey balls.
Posted on 8/1/16 at 2:31 pm to Herman Frisco
quote:
You can't catch a football that's not thrown at you.
Yes you can if the pass gets deflected.
And why should LSU be on here? They only had 2 WRs with more than 200 receiving yards.
This post was edited on 8/1/16 at 2:34 pm
Posted on 8/1/16 at 2:32 pm to BoarEd
quote:
It's because LSU doesn't have a QB on roster that doesn't suck donkey balls.
What does that have to do with ranking WR units?
Posted on 8/1/16 at 2:39 pm to drewb808
quote:
What does that have to do with ranking WR units?
LSU WRs aren't showcased in LSU's offense and the stats prove it. At least not enough to garner widespread national praise.
It's utilization, not physical talent.
Posted on 8/1/16 at 2:42 pm to Billy Mays
How a team plays really does make a huge difference on how many yards any given receiver get. That is why the NFL doesn't just look at those stats. OM, for example threw the ball to a lot of different receivers. Some teams have go to targets most of the time.
Posted on 8/1/16 at 2:51 pm to BoarEd
You can't provide me with one link showing an Auburn fan saying this years group of WRs are great. I'm not arguing, I'm correcting you.
Posted on 8/1/16 at 2:53 pm to drewb808
quote:
It's because LSU doesn't have a QB on roster that doesn't suck donkey balls.
What does that have to do with ranking WR units?
LSU logic, ladies and gentlemen.
Simply put, if you don't have a QB worth a shite, you aren't going to have wide receivers who put up numbers worthy of being considered elite.
Wide receivers aren't SOLELY measured on their ability to throw blocks for Fournette.
Posted on 8/1/16 at 2:55 pm to BoarEd
quote:
Auburn for instance...their fans like to say they have great receivers...and that may be true.
I do not think you have a lot of fans saying that.
If anything, we are hoping the young guys surprise people, but I expect the team will be pretty run heavy.
Posted on 8/1/16 at 3:07 pm to SummerOfGeorge
1) A&M
Posted on 8/1/16 at 3:45 pm to RogerTheShrubber
I haven't seen Auburn fans anywhere claiming their WR were good or should be ranked highly. They are basically all brand new.
Page 3 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News