Started By
Message

re: Bret has support from 24 other coaches.., but 93 are opposed to the new rule..

Posted on 2/26/14 at 2:34 pm to
Posted by Irons Puppet
Birmingham
Member since Jun 2009
25901 posts
Posted on 2/26/14 at 2:34 pm to
The Ark Fans will be glad the rule is shot down when Lashlee is their coach in a couple of years.
Posted by Pigfeet
Ark Mods are Fascists
Member since Mar 2010
19783 posts
Posted on 2/26/14 at 2:37 pm to
I doubt that will ever happen, it may, but very doubtful. Too many people dislike all of those rich Shiloh folks.
Posted by TheCheshireHog
Cashew Chicken Country
Member since Oct 2010
40880 posts
Posted on 2/26/14 at 2:39 pm to
quote:

The Ark Fans will be glad the rule is shot down when Lashlee is their coach in a couple of years.

Why would we care either way. The rule, if passed, would barely even affect the "Malzahn" offense. For example, Marcello said Auburn would have only been flagged twice in the title game. I doubt we as fans would notice either way the difference between Auburn's offense this year and Lashlee's in your hypothetical situation because the affect on what they do if passed will be minuscule.
This post was edited on 2/26/14 at 2:40 pm
Posted by Pigfeet
Ark Mods are Fascists
Member since Mar 2010
19783 posts
Posted on 2/26/14 at 2:39 pm to
quote:

you do realize the offense is in a huddle in that gif, right?


Of course, the injury was caused after the previous play in which the Razorbacks were in HUNH.

What's your point?
Posted by PorkSammich
North FL
Member since Sep 2013
14234 posts
Posted on 2/26/14 at 2:54 pm to
Charles Davis NFL network:

quote:

@SportsTalkwBo: Davis: Even though I am completely opposite Bret Bielema on this issue, I still respect him. I think he really believes it’s about safety.
Posted by Weagle25
THE Football State.
Member since Oct 2011
46186 posts
Posted on 2/26/14 at 2:57 pm to
quote:

Why would we care either way. The rule, if passed, would barely even affect the "Malzahn" offense. For example, Marcello said Auburn would have only been flagged twice in the title game. I doubt we as fans would notice either way the difference between Auburn's offense this year and Lashlee's in your hypothetical situation because the affect on what they do if passed will be minuscule.

Even if we don't snap it in the first ten seconds, the threat of us doing so keeps the Defense from subbing in new guys. That's the whole point of doing HUNH.
Posted by Pigfeet
Ark Mods are Fascists
Member since Mar 2010
19783 posts
Posted on 2/26/14 at 2:57 pm to
and Player Safety will win out over Coaches playbooks.

Posted by The_Joker
Winter Park, Fl
Member since Jan 2013
16316 posts
Posted on 2/26/14 at 2:58 pm to
quote:

The Ark Fans will be glad the rule is shot down when Lashlee is their coach in a couple of years.


Lol QB coach maybe. Nobody is stupid enough to put Malzahn's version of Paul Petrino at the head of any program.
Posted by Irons Puppet
Birmingham
Member since Jun 2009
25901 posts
Posted on 2/26/14 at 3:03 pm to
quote:

quote:


The Ark Fans will be glad the rule is shot down when Lashlee is their coach in a couple of years.




Lol QB coach maybe. Nobody is stupid enough to put Malzahn's version of Paul Petrino at the head of any program.


You hired Barry Alvarez's version as your head coach.
Posted by Razorback Reverend
Member since Dec 2013
22759 posts
Posted on 2/26/14 at 3:07 pm to
I am still undecided..

I want to see a few more players taken to the ER, needing oxygen and stuff prior to making up my very slow mind...

Give me 10 more seconds and I will make a decision!
Posted by DoreonthePlains
Auburn, AL
Member since Nov 2013
7436 posts
Posted on 2/26/14 at 3:10 pm to
quote:

Muschamp, Saban,BB, Miles and Mason in the SEC


Isn't Roper bringing up tempo to UF? I know it's mostly speculation, but I thought that a return to spread and high scoring was the plan to save Boom. As for Mason, you're stretching. He had the blueprint on Oregon. He's earned a rep as one of the best against tempo. He probably wishes more teams went thread.
Posted by The_Joker
Winter Park, Fl
Member since Jan 2013
16316 posts
Posted on 2/26/14 at 3:12 pm to
quote:

You hired Barry Alvarez's version as your head coach.


Last I checked, Bielema was a head coach before Arkansas hired him.
Posted by Irons Puppet
Birmingham
Member since Jun 2009
25901 posts
Posted on 2/26/14 at 3:16 pm to
quote:

Last I checked, Bielema was a head coach before Arkansas hired him.


Barry pulling the strings.
Posted by sugatowng
Look at my bling Bitches
Member since Nov 2006
25331 posts
Posted on 2/26/14 at 3:19 pm to
quote:

25 favor 10-second rule proposal


Did Ellis lie or tell the truth?
Posted by TTsTowel
RIP Bow9den/Coastie
Member since Feb 2010
91645 posts
Posted on 2/26/14 at 3:20 pm to
quote:

Last I checked, Bielema was a mediocre head coach before Arkansas hired him.
Posted by DoreonthePlains
Auburn, AL
Member since Nov 2013
7436 posts
Posted on 2/26/14 at 3:20 pm to
quote:

Barry pulling the strings.


Strings? Controlling Bielema requires steel cables.
Posted by The_Joker
Winter Park, Fl
Member since Jan 2013
16316 posts
Posted on 2/26/14 at 3:23 pm to
quote:

Barry pulling the strings.


Other than not paying assistant coaches shite, what other coaching did Barry do? Did he call plays? Was he present for practices? I'm anxious to know
Posted by Dr RC
The Money Pit
Member since Aug 2011
58058 posts
Posted on 2/26/14 at 3:26 pm to
quote:

PorkSammich




Oh shut the frick up defending Bert with the safety bullshite.

Pulling up morons who have had the wool pulled over their eyes doesn't do shite to hide the real truth.

Bert is the same a-hole who purposely had his Wisconsin team get penalties on kickoffs, THE most dangerous play in football, so he could re-kick to run time off the clock against Penn State.

If that jackass really gave a flying frick about the health of his kids he would NEVER have done something like that.

This post was edited on 2/26/14 at 3:28 pm
Posted by wahoocs
Lafayette, LA
Member since Nov 2004
22299 posts
Posted on 2/26/14 at 3:32 pm to
Well then, 93% it is.

I sit corrected.
Posted by S.E.C. Crazy
Alabama
Member since Feb 2013
7905 posts
Posted on 2/26/14 at 3:33 pm to
For starters just because ony 25 have confimed they are for the rule doesn't mean all the rest are against it.
STUPID LOGIC.

Also a safety rule is for safety and those for or against should have zero bearing on its passage.
This post was edited on 2/26/14 at 5:27 pm
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter