Started By
Message

re: Bigger waste of talent: Dyer or DGB

Posted on 1/6/15 at 12:12 pm to
Posted by Funky Tide 8
Tittleman's Crest
Member since Feb 2009
52685 posts
Posted on 1/6/15 at 12:12 pm to
quote:


you missed the point of the post


So what, exactly, is the point of your post?
Posted by nebraskafaninwi
Member since Mar 2013
2655 posts
Posted on 1/6/15 at 12:12 pm to
Nobody at Oklahoma expected DGB to ever see the field after he did't get clearance last season.
Posted by Latarian
Thug POS
Member since Jul 2010
27604 posts
Posted on 1/6/15 at 12:13 pm to
who wasted their God given talent more: DGB or Dyer?

is it that confusing? Bama grad?
Posted by Pettifogger
Capitol Hill Autonomous Zone
Member since Feb 2012
79190 posts
Posted on 1/6/15 at 12:13 pm to
He doesn't understand that AU fans are saying the question is dumb because Dyer's talents were utilized. He's a resident of Arkansas so this isn't shocking.

But even if straight up, it'd be DGB because Dyer was a great back but great backs are always present in this conference.
Posted by craigbiggio
Member since Dec 2009
31805 posts
Posted on 1/6/15 at 12:13 pm to
quote:

but I appreciate the hyper sensitive Auburn fans you guys never disappoint.



I usually love watching you rile Aubies up but you are really reaching here
This post was edited on 1/6/15 at 12:14 pm
Posted by Funky Tide 8
Tittleman's Crest
Member since Feb 2009
52685 posts
Posted on 1/6/15 at 12:15 pm to
quote:

who wasted their God given talent more: DGB or Dyer?



So how do you define "wasted", jackass?
Posted by Latarian
Thug POS
Member since Jul 2010
27604 posts
Posted on 1/6/15 at 12:17 pm to
it's a legit question, very similar situations.

-highly rated recruits
-get kicked out of their SEC school
-pro career uncertain

here I'll answer so you slower folks understand:

I think the answer Is Dyer because if he stays clean and plays on Gus' offense for a full 4 years his stock would be much higher as a pro prospect than what it is now. DGB has more natural ability and higher NFL ceiling so his flameout wasnt as big a deal because WR's his size and speed are rare.

was that so hard?
Posted by TTsTowel
RIP Bow9den/Coastie
Member since Feb 2010
91645 posts
Posted on 1/6/15 at 12:17 pm to
I question your intelligence by you simply asking a question with such an obvious answer.
Posted by JesusQuintana
St Louis
Member since Oct 2013
33366 posts
Posted on 1/6/15 at 12:19 pm to
quote:

DGB still probably goes n the first 2 or 3 rounds imo and could have an amazing career in the league


He will, and he'll be a beast in the league provided he stays out of trouble.

He did, however, cost himself millions on the first contract. At least I think he did. We shall see where he gets picked.
Posted by Latarian
Thug POS
Member since Jul 2010
27604 posts
Posted on 1/6/15 at 12:19 pm to
uh, being a top 10 talent and fricking up in college so you become a later round pick or undrafted.

difference is only a few million, jackass
Posted by Funky Tide 8
Tittleman's Crest
Member since Feb 2009
52685 posts
Posted on 1/6/15 at 12:22 pm to
quote:

uh, being a top 10 talent and fricking up in college so you become a later round pick or undrafted.



So why didn't you ask who is going to be picked first in the NFL draft, instead of asking a vague question about who wasted more talent, dumb shite?
This post was edited on 1/6/15 at 12:23 pm
Posted by Latarian
Thug POS
Member since Jul 2010
27604 posts
Posted on 1/6/15 at 12:24 pm to
I can't help you, I would make fun of your Bama education but I'm sure you didn't even go there
Posted by Funky Tide 8
Tittleman's Crest
Member since Feb 2009
52685 posts
Posted on 1/6/15 at 12:27 pm to
quote:

I can't help you, I would make fun of your Bama education but I'm sure you didn't even go there






Posted by AMM AU9893
Auburn, AL
Member since Feb 2011
13789 posts
Posted on 1/6/15 at 12:28 pm to
This isn't even a hard question. Both have tons of talent. Option A had one good season with a SECCG loss. Option B ran for 1000+ yards twice and won a SEC championship, a BCS championship, and a BCS championship MVP.

The answer is option A in unanimous decision
Posted by RockyMtnTigerWDE
War Damn Eagle Dad!
Member since Oct 2010
105405 posts
Posted on 1/6/15 at 12:30 pm to
Nice melt Latarian

I was reading and everything seemed normal and then you go retard in the thread.
Posted by Wtodd
Tampa, FL
Member since Oct 2013
67482 posts
Posted on 1/6/15 at 12:30 pm to
quote:

DGB


Next question
Posted by Funky Tide 8
Tittleman's Crest
Member since Feb 2009
52685 posts
Posted on 1/6/15 at 12:30 pm to
quote:

This isn't even a hard question. Both have tons of talent. Option A had one good season with a SECCG loss. Option B ran for 1000+ yards twice and won a SEC championship, a BCS championship, and a BCS championship MVP.



"but but what i really meant to ask is which is going to be selected higher in the nfl draftt hurrr durrrr"
Posted by michaeldwde
N.C.
Member since Nov 2010
3186 posts
Posted on 1/6/15 at 12:31 pm to
quote:

Nice melt Latarian

I was reading and everything seemed normal and then you go retard in the thread.


Par for the course...
This post was edited on 1/6/15 at 12:33 pm
Posted by CrimsonChin
the gutter.
Member since Feb 2010
5857 posts
Posted on 1/6/15 at 12:34 pm to
DGB. All the measurables in the world still does not guarantee production. Dyer still cost himself a lot of money and would have looked great with the entire gusbus system in place.
Posted by Latarian
Thug POS
Member since Jul 2010
27604 posts
Posted on 1/6/15 at 12:35 pm to
you really don't get it do you?

both guys fricking up in school probably cost them millions, in my opinion DGB still gets paid, Dyer won't.

Thus Dyer wasted his talent more.

hurr Durr
This post was edited on 1/6/15 at 12:36 pm
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter