Started By
Message
re: Best SEC Teams since 2005 using Sagarin
Posted on 12/16/14 at 1:17 pm to SummerOfGeorge
Posted on 12/16/14 at 1:17 pm to SummerOfGeorge
quote:
9. 2014 Ole Miss - 95.67
quote:
13. 2007 LSU - 93.39
kern
1
Posted on 12/16/14 at 1:18 pm to LittleJerrySeinfield
quote:Lol disagreeing with stats to determine best football teams doesn't mean you're *mathematically challenged. I'm simply picking at the system and pointing out aspects I disagree with.
Oh man, I am loving these threads. Responses from the math-challenged are hilarious.
Posted on 12/16/14 at 1:18 pm to SummerOfGeorge
quote:Are you the queen of posting threads in which the gumps are #1? Sure seems you like poking your tits out a lot.
SummerOfGeorge
Posted on 12/16/14 at 1:18 pm to dhuck20
quote:
You think 2014 Ole Miss would be 2007 LSU?
A healthy 2014 Ole Miss would. Ole Miss hasn't been 100% healthy since before the LSU game this season. The last game I think we were 100% was the Tennessee game.
Posted on 12/16/14 at 1:20 pm to Henry Jones Jr
quote:Dude, teams aren't healthy the minute they put the pads on...but yeah, whatever makes you feel better.
A healthy 2014 Ole Miss would. Ole Miss hasn't been 100% healthy since before the LSU game this season. The last game I think we were 100% was the Tennessee game.
Posted on 12/16/14 at 1:21 pm to Henry Jones Jr
I know it's impossible to tell, so I will just disagree. 2007 LSU was nothing special historically but ranking a 9-3 team ahead of a national champion isn't something I agree with, stats or not.
This post was edited on 12/16/14 at 1:22 pm
Posted on 12/16/14 at 1:22 pm to sjmabry
quote:
Are you the queen of posting threads in which the gumps are #1? Sure seems you like poking your tits out a lot.
Yea, that is the point of these threads.
You act like it is difficult to find a poll/computer ranking/human ranking that doesn't have a bunch of "Alabama #1" on it over the last 10 years.
Posted on 12/16/14 at 1:24 pm to dhuck20
quote:
I know it's impossible to tell, so I will just disagree. 2007 LSU was nothing special historically but ranking a 9-3 team ahead of a national champion isn't something I agree with, stats or not.
Oh I'm not saying we should be ranked ahead of them. Just saying that a healthy 2014 could beat a healthy 2007 LSU team.
Posted on 12/16/14 at 1:26 pm to Henry Jones Jr
quote:
Just saying that a healthy 2014 could beat a healthy 2007 LSU team.
Yea, I mean 2007 LSU lost to 8-5 Kentucky and 8-5 Arkansas and almost lost to 7-6 Alabama. They were a flawed team. I don't understand why the notion that 2014 Ole Miss could be them is crazy in any way. 2014 Ole Miss beat 2014 Alabama and 2014 Mississippi State, both of which are every bit as good as 2007 LSU.
Posted on 12/16/14 at 1:28 pm to Wtodd
quote:
22. 2013 Missouri - 90.33
Eat a bowl of dicks.
Posted on 12/16/14 at 1:28 pm to SummerOfGeorge
quote:Maybe you should start a thread about something people actually give a shite about...
Yea, that is the point of these threads. You act like it is difficult to find a poll/computer ranking/human ranking that doesn't have a bunch of "Alabama #1" on it over the last 10 years.
Posted on 12/16/14 at 1:29 pm to sjmabry
quote:
Maybe you should start a thread about something people actually give a shite about...
Maybe you should stick to the LOLAGGIE type threads then?
Posted on 12/16/14 at 1:32 pm to SummerOfGeorge
quote:Not really, just wish teenage girls wouldn't poke out the little B cups so much...go ahead though.
Maybe you should stick to the LOLAGGIE type threads then?
Posted on 12/16/14 at 1:32 pm to Henry Jones Jr
quote:
9. 2014 Ole Miss - 95.67
13. 2007 LSU - 93.39
2007 LSU > 2014 LSU > 2014 Mississippi
Posted on 12/16/14 at 1:33 pm to sjmabry
quote:
Not really, just wish teenage girls wouldn't poke out the little B cups so much...go ahead though.
I mean I'd be happy to only post the 2005-2007 numbers if that would make you feel better.
It just so happens Alabama has been winning and winning a lot since 2007. I liked these sorts of analytical analysis long before Alabama was good.
Posted on 12/16/14 at 1:38 pm to SummerOfGeorge
The gap between the top three and everyone else should be MUCH bigger.
2011 LSU/Bama and 2009 Bama would all crush 2014 Bama.
2011 LSU/Bama and 2009 Bama would all crush 2014 Bama.
Posted on 12/16/14 at 1:43 pm to Korin
quote:
The melt is real
Standard response when nothing else makes sense
Posted on 12/16/14 at 1:44 pm to RB10
quote:
2011 LSU/Bama and 2009 Bama would all crush 2014 Bama.
I don't think any of these teams would crush the other ones 7/10 times.
And I think 2014 Bama would give 2009 Bama all they wanted.
Posted on 12/16/14 at 1:46 pm to SummerOfGeorge
quote:
don't think any of these teams would crush the other ones 7/10 times
2011 bama and LSU would beat 2014 Bama 8/10 on a neutral site. Both of those teams were way more talented, especially on D.
Posted on 12/16/14 at 1:47 pm to RB10
quote:
2011 bama and LSU would beat 2014 Bama 8/10 on a neutral site. Both of those teams were way more talented, especially on D.
Beat? I agree, 2011 UA/LSU would be 7-10 pt favorites. But crush just seems a bit over the top.
Page 3 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News