Started By
Message
re: Best of luck to the Vols
Posted on 3/15/13 at 4:54 pm to Bryant91092
Posted on 3/15/13 at 4:54 pm to Bryant91092
I'm gonna where a cup around you.
1
Posted on 3/15/13 at 4:55 pm to SECFan413
quote:
Who knows if the Vols will get in or not, and the same holds true for Bama.
All today really proves is that this idea of a "resume" is such a sham. Bama is a better team than UT, they have proved it on the court, yet paper results say UT is better.
That's stupid. Bama is a bad match up for UT - clearly. Doesn't mean UT wouldn't be the better NCAAT team. They have a better chance of advancing in the NCAAT than Bama. That's why head to head is irrelevant in this case and for the committee's decision.
So I guess the sub .500 UGA team is clearly the better team than UT and should be on the bubble, and not UT if we go the head to head logic.
This post was edited on 3/15/13 at 4:56 pm
Posted on 3/15/13 at 4:55 pm to TT9
quote:
Losing to another bubble team by double digits ended it for you guys.
Posted on 3/15/13 at 4:57 pm to SECFan413
quote:that's because the vols had the gators and mizzou at home, we didn't.
yet paper results say UT is better.
Posted on 3/15/13 at 4:58 pm to Bryant91092
this board can be unbearable without it, otherwise it is a flame war non stop 
Posted on 3/15/13 at 4:58 pm to TT9
quote:
that's because the vols had the gators and mizzou at home, we didn't.
Should we go over your SEC schedule? Easiest of the 14 schedules. It's because of your non-conference schedule and performance - nothing to do with SEC play.
This post was edited on 3/15/13 at 4:59 pm
Posted on 3/15/13 at 5:00 pm to TT9
Bama #1 seed and UT #2 seed in the National Irrelevant Tournament
Posted on 3/15/13 at 5:00 pm to Crompdaddy8
we want to join
Posted on 3/15/13 at 5:00 pm to Bassmanbruno
And we swept Georgia, whereas Georgia swept the vols.
Posted on 3/15/13 at 5:02 pm to TT9
quote:
And we swept Georgia, whereas Georgia swept the vols.
Yet UT still has the better resume - which is all that matters. Better go beat Florida.
Posted on 3/15/13 at 5:02 pm to Bassmanbruno
quote:let's do it, vols had their tougher games at home,we had ours on the road. Except Kentucky.
Should we go over your SEC schedule?
Posted on 3/15/13 at 5:03 pm to Bassmanbruno
quote:
That's stupid. Bama is a bad match up for UT - clearly. Doesn't mean UT wouldn't be the better NCAAT team. They have a better chance of advancing in the NCAAT than Bama. That's why head to head is irrelevant in this case and for the committee's decision.
So I guess the sub .500 UGA team is clearly the better team than UT and should be on the bubble, and not UT if we go the head to head logic.
This is so many levels of asinine. Tournament teams overcome bad matchups vs. "inferior" teams. The reason why UT can't overcome the matchup vs. Bama is because Bama is the better team.
Neither team is a world beater, and both would probably not make it out of the first weekend but trying to argue head to head is irrelevant is ludicrous, and why the tournament selection process is a fraud. Hopefully the selection committee would do the right thing in this situation.
Posted on 3/15/13 at 5:04 pm to TT9
Punch you in the dick, wear a cup around you?
WTF OVER? This thread just got weird.
WTF OVER? This thread just got weird.
Posted on 3/15/13 at 5:05 pm to TT9
quote:
let's do it, vols had their tougher games at home,we had ours on the road. Except Kentucky.
Should we discuss how you got to play the 2 worst teams in the SEC twice? Or that you avoided playing and of the decent teams, other than UT, twice?
Posted on 3/15/13 at 5:05 pm to RockyMtnTigerWDE
He, like Red didn't pick up on my bullshite. Damn youngsters.
Posted on 3/15/13 at 5:06 pm to SECFan413
quote:
This is so many levels of asinine. Tournament teams overcome bad matchups vs. "inferior" teams. The reason why UT can't overcome the matchup vs. Bama is because Bama is the better team.
Neither team is a world beater, and both would probably not make it out of the first weekend but trying to argue head to head is irrelevant is ludicrous, and why the tournament selection process is a fraud. Hopefully the selection committee would do the right thing in this situation.
Sorry buddy - its about resumes - and head to head is pointless until the NCAAT is under way. If head to head meant shite then the Indiana State Sycamores would be a top 10 team in the country.
This post was edited on 3/15/13 at 5:07 pm
Posted on 3/15/13 at 5:07 pm to Bassmanbruno
And who did you guys play twice? Florida? Nope, Mizzouri? Nope. Again you guys had your chance and blew it, you just need to dwi.
Posted on 3/15/13 at 5:09 pm to TT9
quote:
And who did you guys play twice? Florida? Nope, Mizzouri? Nope. Again you guys had your chance and blew it, you just need to dwi.
UGA, Bama, UK, Ole Miss - had we had your schedule we tie for the SEC. Nothing like 4 built in wins.
Posted on 3/15/13 at 5:09 pm to Bassmanbruno
quote:
Sorry buddy - its about resumes - and head to head is pointless until the NCAAT is under way. If head to head meant shite then the Indiana State Sycamores would be a top 10 team in the country.
No need to apologize, UT will be in the NIT, and Bama still has a chance to make it in.
Posted on 3/15/13 at 5:11 pm to SECFan413
quote:
No need to apologize, UT will be in the NIT, and Bama still has a chance to make it in.
Jesus - look at the resumes and tell me that again with a straight face.
Do me a favor and go look up Cal's resume - and compare it to UT's.. Cal is solidly in.. expected to be in the 9-10 seed range.
Page 3 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News