Started By
Message
re: Best of all time in the Big 3 Sports..
Posted on 3/5/17 at 11:27 am to TRUERockyTop
Posted on 3/5/17 at 11:27 am to TRUERockyTop
quote:
you sure as hell haven't as of right now.
I see what you're saying--you've got some good points--but let's not go overboard here. UT's "all-time" stats are somewhat inflated by Neyland's scheduling of weaker teams.
Now, Georgia, Auburn, LSU, and Bama have some historically strong schedules. Georgia at least makes an effort to supplement their weaker SEC East schedule with Georgia Tech. UT seems to be adding the likes of Oklahoma and VaTech, so their schedule is improving.
2
Posted on 3/5/17 at 11:33 am to TheDude321
Neyland padded his stats against teams like LSU**
Posted on 3/5/17 at 11:49 am to Wild Thang
No Ole Miss? Lost is shite.
Posted on 3/5/17 at 12:28 pm to Arksulli
Sup my dood 
In 1973, Ole Miss was a top fifteen all-time program, similar to where Auburn is today. And . . . now it's gone
You could make a good argument for Ole Miss and Missouri being 9a and 9b too. Ole Miss did have true national relevance for a twenty-year span, and Missouri has yet to have such a prolonged impact. In any event, the gap between A&M is Ole Miss is substantial. It would take a national title or ten years of 2015-level play for Ole Miss to catch A&M, with a conference title or two sprinkled in. As you may recall, although it seems like so long ago, Ole Miss finished with a top ten ranking in 2015.
Tiers are not so easy in terms of the SEC when you're as particular as you and I are.
In 1973, Ole Miss was a top fifteen all-time program, similar to where Auburn is today. And . . . now it's gone
You could make a good argument for Ole Miss and Missouri being 9a and 9b too. Ole Miss did have true national relevance for a twenty-year span, and Missouri has yet to have such a prolonged impact. In any event, the gap between A&M is Ole Miss is substantial. It would take a national title or ten years of 2015-level play for Ole Miss to catch A&M, with a conference title or two sprinkled in. As you may recall, although it seems like so long ago, Ole Miss finished with a top ten ranking in 2015.
Tiers are not so easy in terms of the SEC when you're as particular as you and I are.
This post was edited on 3/5/17 at 12:31 pm
Posted on 3/5/17 at 12:30 pm to ksayetiger
quote:
Wtf has arky done in basketball, besides early 90s?
This would be the equivalent of saying LSU football started in the 2000s?
Posted on 3/5/17 at 12:35 pm to TRUERockyTop
If LSU can add another national title and a decade of good football to its history, they'll pass Tennessee, assuming the Vols can't approach Atlanta or the ten-win mark often.
Posted on 3/5/17 at 12:44 pm to TheDude321
quote:
I see what you're saying--you've got some good points--but let's not go overboard here. UT's "all-time" stats are somewhat inflated by Neyland's scheduling of weaker teams.
Now, Georgia, Auburn, LSU, and Bama have some historically strong schedules. Georgia at least makes an effort to supplement their weaker SEC East schedule with Georgia Tech. UT seems to be adding the likes of Oklahoma and VaTech, so their schedule is improving.
No doubt that Georgia, Auburn, Alabama, and LSU have played a tougher schedule overall.
LINK
Posted on 3/5/17 at 4:57 pm to Tornado Alley
quote:
In 1973, Ole Miss was a top fifteen all-time program, similar to where Auburn is today. And . . . now it's gone
That is what makes all time lists so hard to compile. Sure... Bama up top but ignoring Ole Miss or Mizzou... ah shite.
We need more booze to discuss this in the detail that is called for.
Page 3 of 3
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News