Started By
Message
re: Besides Meyer and Spurrier who else WON at UF???
Posted on 12/4/15 at 2:47 pm to gatortrav88
Posted on 12/4/15 at 2:47 pm to gatortrav88
quote:
No teams in Florida started winning till the 80's
Ray Graves was a great coach at UF before the 80s
Heck, Doug Dickey would be a good coach by the standards of some of these teams(like USC)..but he sucked
0
Posted on 12/4/15 at 2:48 pm to CarolinaCock
quote:
This is the last time I will respond to you until your teams offense acutally scores 5TD's in sec play
I'm actually not laughing at Scar, he is just all over you guys over this. I can't help but laugh at it.
Posted on 12/4/15 at 2:48 pm to CarolinaCock
How many former Florida head coaches lost to Georgia Southern?
Posted on 12/4/15 at 2:51 pm to CarolinaCock
No one... aside from a few golden years, UF is irrelevant historically. That said, Muschamp would be an amazingly shitty hire for you guys.
Posted on 12/4/15 at 2:53 pm to CarolinaCock
Here is my point Cock. No matter how you try to spin this the hire will not look like anything other than a complete disaster, a joke, and the vast majority of SEC fans are going to laugh at you.
If by some miracle he is actually successful then you will plenty of time to say "I told you so". Although, that would be weird because no Cock fan actually likes this hire, you guys are simply projecting.
Anyway, back on point. Until that miracle happens, you simply sit over there and bow your head in shame.
If by some miracle he is actually successful then you will plenty of time to say "I told you so". Although, that would be weird because no Cock fan actually likes this hire, you guys are simply projecting.
Anyway, back on point. Until that miracle happens, you simply sit over there and bow your head in shame.
Posted on 12/4/15 at 2:54 pm to JesusQuintana
You should worry about your own coaching hire failure 
Posted on 12/4/15 at 2:56 pm to rockytop627
quote:
No one... aside from a few golden years, UF is irrelevant historically. That said, Muschamp would be an amazingly shitty hire for you guys.
And UT has been irrelevant to UF historically.
See why you get bitch slapped all the time. You come in here starting your shite talking and expect it to be all good.
Twat mustard.
This post was edited on 12/4/15 at 2:57 pm
Posted on 12/4/15 at 2:56 pm to Tolbert1906
Maybe boom isn't very good at offense. That might have something to do with it. Nevertheless, all these other fans laughing at our potential hire might be in for a surprise of there own. Its one thing when your getting a person who actually has very some head coaching experience vs an OC from another university with no experience what so ever. All I'm saying is it's going to be some funny shite if they end up in a worse situation that we are currently then the excuses with start rolling
Posted on 12/4/15 at 2:57 pm to JesusQuintana
He lost miserably at UF with Florida talent. What will he do at SC with lesser talent?
Posted on 12/4/15 at 2:58 pm to CarolinaCock
quote:
in for a surprise of there own
there, their, they're
Posted on 12/4/15 at 3:00 pm to CNB
You kidding? Our guy has been nothing but a resounding success in everything he's ever done in coaching. Every stop. Every job.
Your guy....well, we know. You know. It's no secret.
Your guy....well, we know. You know. It's no secret.
Posted on 12/4/15 at 3:02 pm to CarolinaCock
Didn't the HBC bring Duke the ACC trophy in 1989?
Posted on 12/4/15 at 3:03 pm to CarolinaCock
Florida was dog shite before Spurrier.
Posted on 12/4/15 at 3:03 pm to Country Lawyer
Split with UVA and UVA got the Citrus bowl invite.
Posted on 12/4/15 at 3:04 pm to CarolinaCock
Florida wasn't a program until Spurrier. Kind of the same at all those Florida schools. They didn't realize what they had until the 80's/90's. But you knew that already.
Posted on 12/4/15 at 3:05 pm to thefloydian
quote:
Florida wasn't a program until Spurrier
That's not really true. There were some pretty good years during the wakening up process that Spurrier completed.
Posted on 12/4/15 at 3:07 pm to JesusQuintana
Bruh.
Your argument is that he's a great DC = he's a great HC.
That is literally what everyone thought about Boom. He was(is) a great DC but he went to Florida and failed. Yes, now we're taking a chance with him. Could it be a failure? Sure.
But Muschamp is literal proof that just because you are a good DC, doesn't mean you're a good head coach.
Your argument is that he's a great DC = he's a great HC.
That is literally what everyone thought about Boom. He was(is) a great DC but he went to Florida and failed. Yes, now we're taking a chance with him. Could it be a failure? Sure.
But Muschamp is literal proof that just because you are a good DC, doesn't mean you're a good head coach.
Posted on 12/4/15 at 3:08 pm to CNB
But you're hiring the guy that's not a good HC?
That post literally made my head hurt.
That post literally made my head hurt.
Posted on 12/4/15 at 3:09 pm to JesusQuintana
We're taking a chance on a coach has experience at head coach.
You're taking a chance on a coach who has never been a head coach. That's my point.
You're taking a chance on a coach who has never been a head coach. That's my point.
Posted on 12/4/15 at 3:16 pm to CNB
quote:
We're taking a chance on a coach has experience at head coach.
You are taking a chance on a coach who is/was bad at being a head coach.
Page 2 of 3
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News