Started By
Message
re: Bama lobbying for AP champs?
Posted on 12/29/13 at 2:48 pm to TeLeFaWx
Posted on 12/29/13 at 2:48 pm to TeLeFaWx
quote:
2013 = Alabama was number one all season, and if they were good enough to beat a one loss team ranked 4th, they would be in the Title game. They weren't good enough to beat Auburn. What part of this confuses you?
Show me where Bama is lobbying for 2013. A single fan was kidding around and the idea was immediately rejected by all other Alabama fans. That does not equate to Bama.
1
Posted on 12/29/13 at 2:52 pm to GooseSix
quote:
GooseSix
Dickriding Iowa.
Posted on 12/29/13 at 2:52 pm to Swm323
quote:
Show me where Bama is lobbying for 2013. A single fan was kidding around and the idea was immediately rejected by all other Alabama fans. That does not equate to Bama.
I mean I don't know what we're arguing about. All I'm saying is that Alabama proved they weren't good enough to win the national championship.
Posted on 12/29/13 at 2:57 pm to bmy
quote:
Bama lobbying for AP champs?
Well Alabama is the best team in the country fwiw imho
This post was edited on 12/29/13 at 2:58 pm
Posted on 12/29/13 at 2:58 pm to TeLeFaWx
quote:
I mean I don't know what we're arguing about. All I'm saying is that Alabama proved they weren't good enough to win the national championship.
They are good enough to win it. Just like about 2-3 other teams that aren't playing for it. It just worked out this year that they won't get to play for it because other teams took care of business (FSU and Auburn).
Posted on 12/29/13 at 2:58 pm to attheua
quote:
Well Alabama is the best team in the county fwiw imho
Auburn proved they were better than Alabama...
Posted on 12/29/13 at 2:58 pm to TeLeFaWx
quote:
I mean I don't know what we're arguing about. All I'm saying is that Alabama proved they weren't good enough to win the national championship.
Since we're talking about shite...Lets talk about how mediocre Texas A&M is going to be for a while.
This post was edited on 12/29/13 at 2:59 pm
Posted on 12/29/13 at 3:01 pm to Swm323
quote:
They are good enough to win it. Just like about 2-3 other teams that aren't playing for it. It just worked out this year that they won't get to play for it because other teams took care of business (FSU and Auburn).
No. To be good enough to win a national title you need to be ranked in the final two teams before the end of the year. Bama wasn't good enough to beat Auburn, and fell out of the top 2 where they obviously didn't belong in the first place.
Posted on 12/29/13 at 3:02 pm to thatdude1985
quote:
Since we're talking about shite...Lets talk about how mediocre Texas A&M is going to be for a while.
What does Texas A&M have to do with this conversation?
Posted on 12/29/13 at 3:02 pm to WestCoastAg
quote:
they actually did. Its called the season
Posted on 12/29/13 at 3:04 pm to WestCoastAg
quote:
they actually did. Its called the season
So Auburn shouldn't get to play for it then. They lost also. So has the majority of National Champs since forever.
Posted on 12/29/13 at 3:06 pm to Swm323
Whether or not losing should knock you out is not the point. Alabama would be playing for the title had they beat auburn. They did not. The tide had the chance to play for the title, and they lost. Auburn had the same chance, and they won
This post was edited on 12/29/13 at 3:07 pm
Posted on 12/29/13 at 3:06 pm to GooseSix
quote:
LSU fans get so upset over these things. God forbid LSU actually wins a football game that matters..
Says the poster with the Iowa avatar.
You gumps are just too easy to make fun of and simple minded.. Dance puppet dannnnceeeee...
This post was edited on 12/29/13 at 3:09 pm
Posted on 12/29/13 at 3:06 pm to Swm323
quote:
So Auburn shouldn't get to play for it then. They lost also. So has the majority of National Champs since forever.
You need to stop melting down. I don't get what's eating at you. Auburn was batter than Alabama this year and they proved it.
Posted on 12/29/13 at 3:09 pm to Rabid Tiger
Posted on 12/29/13 at 3:09 pm to WestCoastAg
quote:
Whether or not losing should knock you out is not the point. Alabama would be playing for the title had they beat auburn. They did not. The tide had the chance to play for the title, and they lost. Auburn had the same chance, and they won
These gumps are whining like Matt Leinart after that Rose Bowl. In the gumps opinion, they were the better team on paper, and that should somehow count for something. Too bad this game isn't played on paper, and results on the field determine championships. Alabama lost to Auburn. It's amazing they can't accept that.
Posted on 12/29/13 at 3:11 pm to TeLeFaWx
No. To be good enough means to be good enough. If several teams have the same amount of losses then it depends on who gets voted into position to play for it like Alabama has the last couple of years. Texas A & M was good enough at the end of 2012 that they could have beaten anybody. Unfortunately for them they lost 2 games earlier and there were teams with 1 loss ahead of them. They were good enough though to win the National Championship game though.
Posted on 12/29/13 at 3:12 pm to TeLeFaWx
But it sure is entertaining
Posted on 12/29/13 at 3:13 pm to TeLeFaWx
Dude, your team was 8-4..
8-4...
8-4...
Page 3 of 7
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News