Started By
Message
re: B-hama
Posted on 7/27/14 at 3:36 pm to Othello
Posted on 7/27/14 at 3:36 pm to Othello
quote:Florida has been to it 3 more times than UGA has since it's been in ATL. Alabama's even been there one more time than UGA.
If Bama controlled everything, the SEC championship would have never been taken out of Birmingham and put in Atlanta, where I believe UGA has gone the most since its been there.
0
Posted on 7/27/14 at 3:38 pm to Othello
quote:
If Bama controlled everything, the SEC championship would have never been taken out of Birmingham and put in Atlanta, where I believe UGA has gone the most since its been there.
Posted on 7/27/14 at 3:38 pm to scrooster
quote:I think it was closer to 6 teams.
I remember a couple two or three years ago when something like three or four teams had off weeks prior to playing Bama and Saban was not happy about that.
quote:No, because they changed the rule for the entire conference.
Will that ever happen again while Saban is still coaching there?
Posted on 7/27/14 at 3:38 pm to scrooster
Bama will always be relevant as long as they have a bagman in Louisiana.
Without their Louisiana "investments" they'd be meh.
Without their Louisiana "investments" they'd be meh.
Posted on 7/27/14 at 3:39 pm to GratefulTiger
Posted on 7/27/14 at 3:39 pm to 14&Counting
quote:
What exactly do you think it is that Bama has done? When AU wanted to move the Iron Bowl to Jordan Hare, they got their way....they get to preserve the DSOR just like we wanted to to preserve TSIO. Bama hasn't pulled a revenue grab like Texas despite being the most succesful team in the league by far...AU going to the East is a realignment issue that involves all of the schools. At the end of the day, AU's interests are more or less the same.
Hey, listen, I was playing devils advocate.
Did I not specifically ask if all the claims that Bama controls B-hama were all about scheduling?
Nothing but scheduling?
Other than that has Bama pulled any power plays against others in the conference? Have they slung their weight around in the least?
I remember a couple two or three years ago when something like three or four teams had off weeks prior to playing Bama and Saban was not happy about that.
Will that ever happen again while Saban is still coaching there?
Posted on 7/27/14 at 3:43 pm to scrooster
that is high comedy. But to answer your question yes, yes we do.
Posted on 7/27/14 at 3:43 pm to pvilleguru
quote:
I think it was closer to 6 teams.
...
No, because they changed the rule for the entire conference.
Ahhh fricking haaa!
So the entire conference rule was changed when Saban told them he didn't like it, correct?
Bye-bye, bye-week issue? Tide has changed its tune
Posted on 7/27/14 at 3:43 pm to scrooster
Guys scrooster is having a stroke.
Posted on 7/27/14 at 3:44 pm to scrooster
Technically scrooster if Bama controlled the SEC we would be playing 9 conference games.
Posted on 7/27/14 at 3:44 pm to scrooster
quote:
Did I not specifically ask if all the claims that Bama controls B-hama were all about scheduling?
No you specifically asked how AU could stand it in a Bama dominated league and I was pointing out the fallicy of your argument.
Is this another stupid thread about bridge schedules? Ask LSU fans because you will get a 50 page response of whining and trolling....
Posted on 7/27/14 at 3:48 pm to TigerCruise
No that's untrue. It's a publicity stunt. Saban doesn't want 9 games. He wants the status quo.
Posted on 7/27/14 at 3:49 pm to 14&Counting
quote:
No you specifically asked how AU could stand it in a Bama dominated league and I was pointing out the fallicy of your argument.
Is this another stupid thread about bridge schedules? Ask LSU fans because you will get a 50 page response of whining and trolling....
No goshdammit no. The question for Auburn fans was an afterthought. The main question was, is Bama perceived as controlling the league through B-hama all about scheduling?
Maybe LSU has a reasonable fricking complaint.
I know for a goshdamn fact SCAR has had some issues ... but nothing compared to what LSU has had to deal with in recent past years.
Listen, Bama fans are the bomb ... but honest Bama fans, every single one of them I know, they all laugh and admit their schedule demands are, well, always met.
Posted on 7/27/14 at 3:51 pm to scrooster
My scheduling demands are rarely met.
Posted on 7/27/14 at 3:52 pm to CockRocket
Auburn has done it by sheer will and perseverance.
It is cute that you think USCe would be where they are today without the SEC.
It is cute that you think USCe would be where they are today without the SEC.
quote:
quote:
Nothing wrong with y'all, but you don't bring anything to the table that other teams in the ACC don't bring to a greater degree.
We probably would have won the conference in '11 & '12 and would have been runners-up last year. We'd also have the top baseball program since 2000.
This post was edited on 7/27/14 at 3:57 pm
Posted on 7/27/14 at 3:55 pm to scrooster
Tin foil fits you perfectly, old timer.
Posted on 7/27/14 at 3:55 pm to scrooster
quote:
I remember
At your age, I have my doubts.
Posted on 7/27/14 at 3:56 pm to Tigerman97
quote:
sheer will and perseverance
It is cute that you think USCe would be where they are today without the ACC.
Posted on 7/27/14 at 4:03 pm to scrooster
You're trying too hard.
Posted on 7/27/14 at 4:05 pm to GratefulTiger
quote:
Bama will always be relevant as long as they have a bagman in Louisiana. Without their Louisiana "investments" they'd be meh.
Just beautiful..
Page 2 of 4
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News