Started By
Message

re: Auburn without Cam Newton

Posted on 9/14/11 at 5:07 pm to
Posted by beatbammer
Member since Sep 2010
38017 posts
Posted on 9/14/11 at 5:07 pm to
quote:

Ok, tell me how many rushing tds and yards Trotter has? Yeah, that's why they are removed.


OK, tell me how many rushing tds and yards and passing tds and yards Trotter had with Lee Ziemba, Byron Isom, Ryan Pugh, Mike Berry, and Brandon Moseley blocking for him and with Darvin Adams and Terrell Zachary catching his passes?

What? They're not there anymore? And Trotter didn't get to start with those guys?

Exactly.

Pointless.

You can shut the frick up now.
Posted by bingo
indy-freakin'-anna
Member since Sep 2008
4204 posts
Posted on 9/14/11 at 5:13 pm to
quote:

Maybe Im being too logical about this whole thing...



probably, logic and level headedness is not allowed on this board.

excellent read. you had well thought out points that were presented without flaming or disparaging auburn.
Posted by LSUcc
St. Louis, MO
Member since Feb 2009
2057 posts
Posted on 9/14/11 at 5:14 pm to
quote:

Pointless


You're right. Cam Newton had such little impact in those games and Trotter is going to lead AU back to the ship.
This post was edited on 9/14/11 at 5:19 pm
Posted by LA kid but AU fan
Jay Prosch Fan Club: Historian
Member since Apr 2007
4634 posts
Posted on 9/14/11 at 5:17 pm to
quote:

Audodger asked why this keeps being brought up, so I gave him the answer.


So yes to my question then, the answer is speculation?
Posted by BigerTait
Florida
Member since Dec 2010
167 posts
Posted on 9/14/11 at 5:19 pm to
quote:

you had well thought out points that were presented without flaming or disparaging auburn.


I appreciate it. Thats what I was going for. Somehow it got turned into this mess...
Posted by LA kid but AU fan
Jay Prosch Fan Club: Historian
Member since Apr 2007
4634 posts
Posted on 9/14/11 at 5:20 pm to
quote:

I'm not pissed or filled with hatred towards AU
Posted by WDE24
Member since Oct 2010
54177 posts
Posted on 9/14/11 at 5:20 pm to
quote:

You're right. Cam Newton had such little impact in those games and Trotter is going to lead AU back to the ship.

Rantard is going to tard.
Posted by beatbammer
Member since Sep 2010
38017 posts
Posted on 9/14/11 at 5:22 pm to
quote:

Rantard is going to tard.


He's gone full rantard.
Posted by bingo
indy-freakin'-anna
Member since Sep 2008
4204 posts
Posted on 9/14/11 at 5:27 pm to
quote:

Somehow it got turned into this mess


you're just getting some secr lovin'...
Posted by GoCrazyAuburn
Member since Feb 2010
34905 posts
Posted on 9/14/11 at 5:37 pm to
quote:

Rantard is going to tard.


He's gone full rantard.




Posted by LSUcc
St. Louis, MO
Member since Feb 2009
2057 posts
Posted on 9/14/11 at 5:41 pm to
All right, lesson learned. Never use stats to back up your side of the argument. The other fans hate it.
Posted by WDE24
Member since Oct 2010
54177 posts
Posted on 9/14/11 at 5:45 pm to
quote:

All right, lesson learned. Never use stats to back up your side of the argument.
I have no doubt that is the lesson you will learn, but let me tell you the lesson you should learn: Posting a few stats and then guessing what would have happened absent one player who help create those stats is not the same as using stats to support an argument.

I'm sure this will be too difficult of a concept for you to understand because you post like a drunk, high school drop-out with a learning disability, but don't say I didn't try to help the helpless.

This post was edited on 9/14/11 at 5:50 pm
Posted by LSUcc
St. Louis, MO
Member since Feb 2009
2057 posts
Posted on 9/14/11 at 5:49 pm to
quote:

Posting a few stats and then guessing what would have happened absent one player who help create those stats is not the same as using stats to support an argument.


I'm sorry, but I thought the point of the thread was to give your opinion on what you thought the outcome would have been without Cam Newton. Guess I misread.
This post was edited on 9/14/11 at 5:52 pm
Posted by bingo
indy-freakin'-anna
Member since Sep 2008
4204 posts
Posted on 9/14/11 at 5:49 pm to
quote:

I'm sure this will be too difficult of a concept for you to understand because you post like a drunk, college student with a learning disability


don't be mean, he's just trying to fit in here.
Posted by blzr
MB
Member since Mar 2011
30103 posts
Posted on 9/14/11 at 5:50 pm to
quote:

(No message)


Getting better
Posted by GoCrazyAuburn
Member since Feb 2010
34905 posts
Posted on 9/14/11 at 5:52 pm to
The 2010-2011 Mavericks averaged 98.2 points per game. Dirk Novitzki averaged 27.7 per game. If they didn't have dirk, they would have only averaged 70.5 points per game.



STATS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


Posted by WDE24
Member since Oct 2010
54177 posts
Posted on 9/14/11 at 5:53 pm to
Don't trip while you back pedal. That can be embarrassing.
This post was edited on 9/14/11 at 5:54 pm
Posted by LSUcc
St. Louis, MO
Member since Feb 2009
2057 posts
Posted on 9/14/11 at 5:57 pm to
quote:

GoCrazyAuburn


Again, what was the OP asking for? An opinion. I gave mine based on his stats and his role on the team. I'm sorry if that offends you.
Posted by GoCrazyAuburn
Member since Feb 2010
34905 posts
Posted on 9/14/11 at 6:04 pm to
quote:

Again, what was the OP asking for? An opinion. I gave mine based on his stats and his role on the team. I'm sorry if that offends you.




your opinion would have been fine. When you try and bring that he was paid bullshite into the equation, thats not going to fly.

My opinion has been that you can't look at last years production, subtract Cam, and say thats how things would have worked out. It is impossible to do and really not any sound logic whatsoever. You can try and keep arguing that way, but its a futile way to look at it.
This post was edited on 9/14/11 at 6:07 pm
Posted by LSUcc
St. Louis, MO
Member since Feb 2009
2057 posts
Posted on 9/14/11 at 6:05 pm to
quote:

When you try and bring that he was paid bullshite into the equation, thats not going to fly


I didn't. Audodger asked why everyone only asks this about Cam and not anyone else. I said it a little more bluntly than I probably should have, but the reason is because there was a scandal.
This post was edited on 9/14/11 at 6:08 pm
Jump to page
Page First 5 6 7 8 9 ... 11
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 7 of 11Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter