Started By
Message
re: Auburn needs to part ways with under armour
Posted on 2/19/12 at 5:17 pm to Damn Good Dawg
Posted on 2/19/12 at 5:17 pm to Damn Good Dawg
quote:
DGD
Diggin the new sig. Love dem Charleston angel harps
1
Posted on 2/19/12 at 5:17 pm to Broski
they are not totally, oregon horrible. they just kind of look like something an hourly wage worker would wear in a bakery...i don't think under armour spent a lot of time on the design of this uniform.
Posted on 2/19/12 at 5:18 pm to Broski
Auburn is and always will remain the top UA school in football, we have an MFN clause that dictates it. Money talks so therefore nothing will change with our uniform branding.
Posted on 2/19/12 at 5:21 pm to Broski
Fashion board
Posted on 2/19/12 at 5:26 pm to piggidyphish
Under Armour didnt really change our Uni's though. Ours are classic so we didnt allow them much leeway with the designs.
Posted on 2/19/12 at 5:30 pm to tylerdurden24
quote:
Diggin the new sig. Love dem Charleston angel harps
gotta rep my love for the jewel of the south
quote:
plazda
you best be talking about only our pro combats, otherwise you're just one of those retarded fellers
Posted on 2/19/12 at 5:35 pm to Broski
Wow had no idea the 60s uniforms came back in style.. 
Posted on 2/19/12 at 5:44 pm to winyahpercy
quote:
it's not Under Armour... they just design the logo. the coach gets to design the uniform.
Well as far as football goes, the Aubs better take that power away from Clitchztink. God, his dentist jacket is awful.
Posted on 2/19/12 at 5:48 pm to bamascott2
Auburn doesn't design our own uniforms. We are at the mercy of UA.
Posted on 2/19/12 at 6:05 pm to Marines4Auburn
And did you see those shoes?
Like ohmygahw!
Like ohmygahw!
Posted on 2/19/12 at 6:09 pm to Marines4Auburn
quote:
Auburn doesn't design our own uniforms. We are at the mercy of UA.
that's not true. the school works w/ UA or Nike to design the uniform. that's why Auburn, SC and Maryland have different design styles even though they are all UA schools. UA does try to push styles on the school, but they school gets to decide. last season, UA tried to get SC to do a flag uniform like they did for their flagship school UMd, but SC vetoed it.
Posted on 2/19/12 at 6:16 pm to bamascott2
quote:
Aubs better take that power away from Clitchztink. God, his dentist jacket is awful.
And there it is...what the frick does this thread have to do with Gene Chizik?
Posted on 2/19/12 at 6:17 pm to plazadweller
ugly unis on to your coaches' and their ugly attire 
Posted on 2/19/12 at 6:18 pm to plazadweller
Chizik's dental smock is Under Armour ?
Posted on 2/19/12 at 6:20 pm to KillianRussell
all in... yo mouth
Posted on 2/19/12 at 6:20 pm to winyahpercy
quote:
that's not true. the school works w/ UA or Nike to design the uniform. that's why Auburn, SC and Maryland have different design styles even though they are all UA schools. UA does try to push styles on the school, but they school gets to decide. last season, UA tried to get SC to do a flag uniform like they did for their flagship school UMd, but SC vetoed it.
To a certain extent we work with them but they have the ultimate say. We give them certain suggestions but that's it, one year they made us switch cleats and the AD wasn't happy about it.
Posted on 2/19/12 at 6:21 pm to Marines4Auburn
i'd like to see the Under Armor UGA uni using the old GA flag 
Posted on 2/19/12 at 6:23 pm to Broski
To the OP: UA has helped AU become a more nationally recognized name. Smthg Russell didn't seem to be keen on accomplishing so...No thank you is my response to your request.
Posted on 2/19/12 at 6:33 pm to Marines4Auburn
quote:
To a certain extent we work with them but they have the ultimate say. We give them certain suggestions but that's it, one year they made us switch cleats and the AD wasn't happy about it.
well footwear is a little different. i think we weren't excited about the cleat change, but they don't make the cleats specific to each school, and UA doesn't have near the footwear background of Nike. i understand this crap more than i should because we've got some stupid fans that spend most of their time worrying about uniforms rather than the game. in fact, Spurrier is guaranteed a question during preseason on his call-in show about the uniform changes and he explains the process of working w/ UA during the off season. UA likes to change thing to use new technology and it helps sell more uniforms to the fans, which is how they recoup their money. but the colors, names, fonts, logos, etc. are ultimately the decision of the school. i'm sure UA (or Nike) comes in w/ some concept drawings, but the school has final say.
Posted on 2/19/12 at 6:37 pm to plazadweller
quote:
To the OP: UA has helped AU become a more nationally recognized name. Smthg Russell didn't seem to be keen on accomplishing so...No thank you is my response to your request.
If Russell didn't move their manufacturing HQ from Alex City to wherever it ended up, Auburn would still be a Russell school.
Page 2 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News