Started By
Message
Auburn lineman down field?
Posted on 12/1/13 at 9:44 pm
Posted on 12/1/13 at 9:44 pm
On Auburn's TD at 32 seconds left in game. Marshall was nearly over the line of scrimmage, but no one has talked about his 4 offensive lineman that were already over the line? Did I miss something here? Has the rule been changed? If you look at the replay, there were clearly 4 lineman over the line. 
20
Posted on 12/1/13 at 9:45 pm to houlie41
Dec 2013, first post? hmmmm.
Posted on 12/1/13 at 9:46 pm to houlie41
quote:
Did I miss something here?
yeah, the link to the SEC Rant
Posted on 12/1/13 at 9:49 pm to ATLTiger
He's probably starting a new thread on the rant. 
Posted on 12/1/13 at 9:52 pm to houlie41
Careful... you're going to sound like Aggies complaining about the non-horse-collar call. And you don't want to be like those guys.
Posted on 12/1/13 at 9:54 pm to houlie41
From one Gump to another: chill out with that shite.
Posted on 12/1/13 at 9:54 pm to houlie41
No alter suspicion here. You have an excellent point. Award the game to Alabama University.
Posted on 12/1/13 at 9:54 pm to houlie41
Lineman can be in the free blocking zone...
so no
so no
Posted on 12/1/13 at 9:55 pm to finestfirst79
I ain't complaining and I don't really care, except it was puzzling to me listening to the commentators discuss Marshall's foot not crossing the line, while you could see the lineman downfield. BTW, I'm LSU alum and could care less.
Posted on 12/1/13 at 9:55 pm to houlie41
Before you can ask; You cannot have Bama board access.
Posted on 12/1/13 at 9:56 pm to dgc
More like from one alter to another.
Posted on 12/1/13 at 9:58 pm to houlie41
Oh man, just no. We lost, they beat us. Move on man
Posted on 12/1/13 at 9:58 pm to houlie41
It affected our coverage dammit? We got whipped. Now if you want to say the replay guy was drunk I'm in.
Posted on 12/1/13 at 10:00 pm to houlie41
if you're talking about the fullback, he doesn't count.
#35 is the fullback.
Prosch.
#35 is the fullback.
Prosch.
Posted on 12/1/13 at 10:04 pm to houlie41
They were engaged in blocking, so it doesn't count.
Posted on 12/1/13 at 10:09 pm to houlie41
I thought the rule was that in eligible receivers couldn't be further than 5 yards downfield from the LoS, not "over the line"
Am I wrong here?
Am I wrong here?
Posted on 12/1/13 at 10:12 pm to Riseupfromtherubble
quote:
I thought the rule was that in eligible receivers couldn't be further than 5 yards downfield from the LoS, not "over the line"
Am I wrong here?
Alter revealed
Posted on 12/1/13 at 10:13 pm to Riseupfromtherubble
it's 3 yards
the furthest downfield ineligible receiver was Kozan #63 who was exactly 3 yards downfield
the furthest downfield ineligible receiver was Kozan #63 who was exactly 3 yards downfield
Posted on 12/1/13 at 10:13 pm to houlie41
While you're at it could you explain the Alabama no-call targeting on our punt returner. Thx
xoxo
xoxo
Posted on 12/1/13 at 10:15 pm to beaver
Prosch was a beast. It seems like bama could have figured they were running his direction 9/10 times but still couldn't stop it.
Page 1 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News