Started By
Message

re: Auburn Acknowledges NCCA Claims of 1913, 1983, & 1993 National Championship

Posted on 5/16/14 at 3:02 pm to
Posted by StopRobot
Mobile, AL
Member since May 2013
15414 posts
Posted on 5/16/14 at 3:02 pm to
quote:

Yall bama fans need to get on the same page. one says if the NCAA list it, its recognized, and the other states the opposite


I was saying you boogs need to get on the same page. Bama 1941 is a made up championship vs. if a team is listed as being selected by a poll, and that poll is listed on a document put out by the NCAA, it is a legitimate natty title.
Posted by elposter
Member since Dec 2010
25014 posts
Posted on 5/16/14 at 3:03 pm to
quote:

why do people care so much about this?


Offseason?

Not really sure. Opposing fans have written lengthy articles about Alabama's number of national championships for years. It's apparently always been a hot topic. This is not new.
Posted by Lordofwrath88
Tuscaloosa
Member since Oct 2012
6857 posts
Posted on 5/16/14 at 3:04 pm to
quote:

They want to keep up with the Joneses so badly. It's rather precious.



To be fair, Alabama's 6 extra titles was also a case of keeping up with the Joneses as it was right on the heels of Notre Dame suddenly claiming an extra bundle of titles to make sure they were the #1 program in college football history.
Posted by Pettifogger
Capitol Hill Autonomous Zone
Member since Feb 2012
79381 posts
Posted on 5/16/14 at 3:05 pm to
quote:

To be fair, Alabama's 6 extra titles was also a case of keeping up with the Joneses as it was right on the heels of Notre Dame suddenly claiming an extra bundle of titles to make sure they were the #1 program in college football history.



Who is this rational guy
Posted by auburnphan23
Member since Jan 2014
5862 posts
Posted on 5/16/14 at 3:06 pm to
Any Auburn fan who claims these titles other than as a way of trolling opposing fan bases should be kicked in the nutts imo
Posted by Old Hellen Yeller
New Orleans
Member since Jan 2014
9423 posts
Posted on 5/16/14 at 3:06 pm to
quote:

You have to understand their rules. If its about Auburn its whichever has Auburn looking the worst and when its about Bama its whichever makes them look best. They've gotten so bad that they don't even care how stupid their double standard makes them look anymore


Just be consistent. If that NCAA PDF is what auburn is counting by, the count is

19-5
or
9-2

If auburn is moving to 5 then Alabama would have 19 using the same list.
Posted by ChexMix
Taste the Deliciousness
Member since Apr 2014
25494 posts
Posted on 5/16/14 at 3:08 pm to
83 - ok
13 - ok
93? lol
Posted by TheSandman
Notasulga
Member since Nov 2010
19411 posts
Posted on 5/16/14 at 3:09 pm to
From the AU site:
quote:

Updated 04/24/14
Was the date not changed or did people just now notice that was slipped in there?
Posted by Manzielathon
Death Valley
Member since Sep 2013
8951 posts
Posted on 5/16/14 at 3:09 pm to
congrats on your 80k capacity title
Posted by WG_Dawg
Hoover
Member since Jun 2004
86572 posts
Posted on 5/16/14 at 3:10 pm to
Congrats on a username that was outdated 4 months after you signed up.
Posted by undecided
Member since May 2012
15492 posts
Posted on 5/16/14 at 3:11 pm to
quote:

Congrats on a username that was outdated 4 months after you signed up.

Aggies gonna Aggie
Posted by LSUNV
In the woods or on the water
Member since Feb 2011
22424 posts
Posted on 5/16/14 at 3:12 pm to
I guess we can add 2011 and be co-champs!! We up to 9 now
This post was edited on 5/16/14 at 3:13 pm
Posted by Rabern57
Alabama
Member since Jan 2010
13366 posts
Posted on 5/16/14 at 3:12 pm to
quote:

Just be consistent. If that NCAA PDF is what auburn is counting by, the count is

19-5
or
9-2

If auburn is moving to 5 then Alabama would have 19 using the same list.

The problem is Bama fans want to claim 19-2 or 15-2. The entire reason Bama fans are posting in here is to down play Auburn's number while still claiming whatever the number they have made up now.
This post was edited on 5/16/14 at 3:15 pm
Posted by GooseSix
Member since Jun 2012
19540 posts
Posted on 5/16/14 at 3:12 pm to
Posted by TheSandman
Notasulga
Member since Nov 2010
19411 posts
Posted on 5/16/14 at 3:12 pm to
Yeah that makes sense because we're claiming championships for years after the institution of the BCS.
Posted by elposter
Member since Dec 2010
25014 posts
Posted on 5/16/14 at 3:14 pm to
quote:

How many did all the other SEC teams pick up today?


Everyone please count your respective teams titles so we can get the definitive SEC national championship count.

LINK

(starts on page 76)

So far we have:

Alabama - 19
Auburn - 5 (I think - I didn't count these myself)
LSU -
Ole Miss -
A&M -
MSU -
Ark
UF -
UGA -
UT -
SC -
UK -
Vandy -
Mizzou -
Posted by graves1
Birmingham, Alabama
Member since Mar 2011
2149 posts
Posted on 5/16/14 at 3:14 pm to
No, we are here to laugh at you. Not all Auburn fans. Just you........
Posted by undecided
Member since May 2012
15492 posts
Posted on 5/16/14 at 3:14 pm to
quote:

quote:

Updated 04/24/14

Was the date not changed or did people just now notice that was slipped in there?

Think people just now noticed and are now mad
Posted by elposter
Member since Dec 2010
25014 posts
Posted on 5/16/14 at 3:15 pm to
quote:

I guess we can add 2011 and be co-champs!! We up to 9 now


Sorry, not even the NCAA mega-list recognizes LSU for that one.
Posted by Gcockboi
Rock Hill
Member since Oct 2012
7689 posts
Posted on 5/16/14 at 3:15 pm to
Auburn's inferiority complex is on full display with this latest move. Pathetic.
Jump to page
Page First 6 7 8 9 10 ... 17
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 8 of 17Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter