Started By
Message
0
Posted on 5/16/14 at 2:42 pm to Tuscaloosa
So does this mean we need to go roll Toomers?
Posted on 5/16/14 at 2:42 pm to Pettifogger
quote:
This doesn't negate Bama's ridiculous ones in the least. Our new ones certainly have holes, but at least we have arguments.
You sound like a little kid that just got in trouble, trying to appeal to his mother that another kid did something just as bad-- worse even!
Little brother gonna little brother.
Posted on 5/16/14 at 2:43 pm to auburnphan23
Will you just create another alter to claim them?
Posted on 5/16/14 at 2:43 pm to TheSandman
quote:
NCAA link
Thanks for posting, I was just looking for this.
The NCAA claimed these titles in Auburn's name thus prompting the team to consider publicly claiming them. It's not like we did a google search and arbitrarily added a couple of titles :looksatbama:
Posted on 5/16/14 at 2:44 pm to chattabama
tPOS
Posted on 5/16/14 at 2:45 pm to TheSandman
quote:
So does this mean we need to go roll Toomers?
The Twittaz and tRant would break
Posted on 5/16/14 at 2:45 pm to TheSandman
We got 7!!
Posted on 5/16/14 at 2:45 pm to RandySavage
quote:
9-2 vs. 11-0
So then Utah is the 2008 national champion and not Florida.....got it
Posted on 5/16/14 at 2:46 pm to undecided
So can we claim '46 at least now? I mean we were the only undefeated team left
Posted on 5/16/14 at 2:46 pm to Pettifogger
Whatever guy.
Auburn was on no tv, no bowl -major probation
in 1993.
Just let it go. Yall just won 3 NC's in one day.
And you still want to bitch about Alabama.
Auburn was on no tv, no bowl -major probation
in 1993.
Just let it go. Yall just won 3 NC's in one day.
And you still want to bitch about Alabama.
Posted on 5/16/14 at 2:46 pm to undecided
In terms of "robbed" teams... Auburn doesn't come close to Penn State, by the way.
Posted on 5/16/14 at 2:47 pm to undecided
Basic bitch
Posted on 5/16/14 at 2:48 pm to undecided
quote:
Thanks for posting, I was just looking for this.
The NCAA claimed these titles in Auburn's name thus prompting the team to consider publicly claiming them. It's not like we did a google search and arbitrarily added a couple of titles :looksatbama:
Incorrect. The NCAA did not "claim" titles in Auburn's name. It listed who the selectors voted natty champion.
Posted on 5/16/14 at 2:50 pm to hg
Posted on 5/16/14 at 2:50 pm to dawgfan24348
quote:
So can we claim '46 at least now?
I've been claiming 5 titles for years.
Posted on 5/16/14 at 2:51 pm to StopRobot
quote:One might say, they are "recognizing" them.
Incorrect. The NCAA did not "claim" titles in Auburn's name. It listed who the selectors voted natty champion.
Posted on 5/16/14 at 2:51 pm to StopRobot
quote:
So then Utah is the 2008 national champion and not Florida.....got it
:kige:
Posted on 5/16/14 at 2:51 pm to NYCAuburn
quote:
No they recognize and list the major selectors
Right, and in recogizing the selectors, they list the teams that were selected thus essentially recognizing the teams. You are arguing semantics, but fine they recognize the selectors and "list" the teams those selectors picked. Point is the same: on their website, they list the selectors and the teams selected for each year and for some reason they don't list Auburn for 1913, 1983, 1993.
quote:
Go read the NCAA record books they are all in there, page 76 is where it starts
Thanks, just looked it up. It is in their record books. It's strange they didn't list them on their website where they list championship history. Their official record book lists EVERYBODY in there, even Alabama in 1941 (which is also not on their website listing and rightfully so really). Hell, Oklahoma won a NC in 2003 according to the NCAA record books.
Posted on 5/16/14 at 2:51 pm to StopRobot
quote:
So then Utah is the 2008 national champion and not Florida.....got it
doesnt appear so
quote:no utah per the NCAA
2008
Florida: Berryman, ^BCS, USA Today, AP, Dunkel, FW, NFF
Page 6 of 17
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News