Started By
Message
0
Posted on 2/22/17 at 7:24 pm to partsman103
Fact is, they are not going to just accept a year bowl ban.
Posted on 2/22/17 at 7:38 pm to Jjdoc
quote:
Fact is, they are not going to just accept a year bowl ban.
i went back and checked out other schools charged with Lack of Institutional Control see here. Seems like 2 year bowl ban, 20 scholarship reduction and 5 years probabation are the usual penalties.
i do not know if this being OM's second lack of institutional control charge will come into play.
Posted on 2/22/17 at 7:38 pm to memphisplaya
quote:
When has the NCAA allowed the testimony of a rival school's player?
probably plenty of times. you really think this is the first time the ncaa has interviewed a recruit that was enrolled at another school? lol
Posted on 2/22/17 at 7:39 pm to AshLSU
true dat no proof is necessary
Posted on 2/22/17 at 7:40 pm to Cowbells
Can't all of these threads move to the Ole Miss board?
Posted on 2/22/17 at 7:49 pm to kywildcatfanone
See sig quote.
Poor Deontay
Poor Deontay
Posted on 2/22/17 at 7:54 pm to Larry
Anyone remember that former or current OM player that went on a twitter rant when the allegations were first brought up last year?
Something to the tune of "We decided as a team to get better and work more, no cheating occurred". I'm trying to find his twitter account
Something to the tune of "We decided as a team to get better and work more, no cheating occurred". I'm trying to find his twitter account
This post was edited on 2/22/17 at 7:55 pm
Posted on 2/22/17 at 8:01 pm to texag7
I think at one time there was a clock on here that showed how many years, days, etc it's been since ole miss won an SEC title...has to be over 45 years 
Posted on 2/22/17 at 8:01 pm to Rebel
quote:
i went back and checked out other schools charged with Lack of Institutional Control see here. Seems like 2 year bowl ban, 20 scholarship reduction and 5 years probabation are the usual penalties.
This post was edited on 2/22/17 at 8:02 pm
Posted on 2/22/17 at 8:04 pm to Henry Jones Jr
damn you stupid. You cant sue the NCAA as a member institution. And your guys are admitting most of it.
Posted on 2/22/17 at 8:04 pm to TinGym
quote:
What I want to know is how much OM paid for the players that did sign with them. How much is a believable amount?
The cute thing is Rebs thinking Tunsil, Treadwell, Lodge, Little and Anderson came there for free.
Posted on 2/22/17 at 8:08 pm to Topwater Trout
quote:
I think at one time there was a clock on here that showed how many years, days, etc it's been since ole miss won an SEC title...has to be over 45 years
1963.
Posted on 2/22/17 at 8:10 pm to Rebel
quote:
i went back and checked out other schools charged with Lack of Institutional Control see here. Seems like 2 year bowl ban, 20 scholarship reduction and 5 years probabation are the usual penalties.
How many of those had 13 level 1 violations? Look at what happened to USC with one level 1
Posted on 2/22/17 at 8:11 pm to Korin
that self-imposed ban isn't going to do shite for them.
and Freeze is going to get a show cause. Which unfortunately will be the best thing that's happened to them in years
and Freeze is going to get a show cause. Which unfortunately will be the best thing that's happened to them in years
This post was edited on 2/22/17 at 8:15 pm
Posted on 2/22/17 at 8:12 pm to kywildcatfanone
quote:
Can't all of these threads move to the Ole Miss board?
this affects all SEC schools.
do not fret. UK will get their very own sticky when Calipari gets busted.
Posted on 2/22/17 at 8:59 pm to Rebel
You know, I wanted Ole Miss's shite stopped, but I didn't want them turned into a homecoming opponent for Milsaps. It hurts the whole league. Freeze gets what he has coming to him, cheating bastard. But I wanted them hurt, not destroyed. From the looks of it, this could be the roughest penalty since SMU. Ole Miss may become SMU.
Trust me, you don't want this for your worst enemy. Auburn and Bama already had a limited nuclear exchange back in the late 80's, early 90's. Both of us paid a steep price. And Fulmer tried to destroy Alabama with the Albert Means case. He almost succeeded.
As an Alabama fan, the thing about the Means case that bothers me the most to this day isn't the punishment or the fact that we got caught. That much is true. No, what bothers me the most was there were 6 other schools that were bidding and paying for Means to come to their school and only Alabama and Kentucky were punished for it.
Memphis, Ole Miss, Michigan State, Arkansas, Georgia, and Tennessee were all involved in the scandal. Make no mistake, regardless of who the NCAA is hunting, it's not good for anyone in the league when they are on the loose.
Trust me, you don't want this for your worst enemy. Auburn and Bama already had a limited nuclear exchange back in the late 80's, early 90's. Both of us paid a steep price. And Fulmer tried to destroy Alabama with the Albert Means case. He almost succeeded.
As an Alabama fan, the thing about the Means case that bothers me the most to this day isn't the punishment or the fact that we got caught. That much is true. No, what bothers me the most was there were 6 other schools that were bidding and paying for Means to come to their school and only Alabama and Kentucky were punished for it.
Memphis, Ole Miss, Michigan State, Arkansas, Georgia, and Tennessee were all involved in the scandal. Make no mistake, regardless of who the NCAA is hunting, it's not good for anyone in the league when they are on the loose.
This post was edited on 2/22/17 at 9:01 pm
Posted on 2/22/17 at 9:03 pm to Cowbells
Posted on 2/22/17 at 9:08 pm to phil4bama
I would be worried as frick if one of my players testified to committing a major rules violation for immunity. Immune or not, now a coach knows one of his players is dirty. A man of integrity would drop his arse.
Posted on 2/22/17 at 9:09 pm to Korin
THAT MAKES ME LAUGH......... 
Page 6 of 27
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News