Started By
Message
Posted on 10/13/13 at 3:21 pm to tigafan89
So they should've pulled a South Carolina and Arkansas and sucked for awhile is what your saying?
This post was edited on 10/13/13 at 3:22 pm
Posted on 10/13/13 at 3:37 pm to tigafan89
I'll let you make your own decision on A&M. I will speak to Missouri. Last year was an off year for them. When we joined the Big 12, I ignored Mizzou. Bad decision. Those guys will beat you if you don't watch out.
Missouri has had some bad luck and the loss of Franklin will cause some grief. But if you think Missouri is hurting the SEC, you need a reality check.
They will pull their load in the SEC.
Missouri has had some bad luck and the loss of Franklin will cause some grief. But if you think Missouri is hurting the SEC, you need a reality check.
They will pull their load in the SEC.
Posted on 10/13/13 at 3:38 pm to tigafan89
quote:
With Missouri and Texas A&M winning, does that weaken the perception of the SEC?
Yes.
Posted on 10/13/13 at 3:46 pm to IAmReality
quote:
They joined the SEC at a good time.
A&M got Manziel, they'd be a 6-6 team without him.
Also lots of SEC schools are down right now from their usual.
Posted on 10/13/13 at 3:51 pm to tigafan89
quote:
With Missouri and Texas A&M winning, does that weaken the perception of the SEC? I think it does, which is why I'm now cheering against both of these schools.
...not yet since TAMU manhandled Oklahoma in their bowl game last year. Ole Miss might not qualify for a bowl and they beat Texas easily at home. The SEC still gets respect. It has a record eight teams ranked this week.
Posted on 10/13/13 at 9:44 pm to SirSheldon2U
quote:
Actually Mizzou has an all time winning record against SEC teams but flame on.
Congratulations?
Of course, you knew what I meant, and I'm right. Missouri has won one meaningful game since joining the SEC and it was against an overrated Georgia team.
Congratulations on maybe being on par with Arkansas and Mississippi State.
Posted on 10/13/13 at 10:00 pm to tigafan89
This thread is hilarious. The trolling is top notch. I love the backhanded compliment/troll to start the thread. Touche tigafan89
Posted on 10/13/13 at 10:03 pm to tigafan89
not as much as results like Oregon by 10 scores over Tenn, Rutgers over Arkansas, Clemson over LSU and UGA, Miami over Florida, etc
The SEC made its reputation out of conference (esp in BCS bowl games) and bad results in too many out of conference games would tarnish the rep more than A&M and MU doing well IMO
The SEC made its reputation out of conference (esp in BCS bowl games) and bad results in too many out of conference games would tarnish the rep more than A&M and MU doing well IMO
Posted on 10/13/13 at 10:10 pm to tigafan89
quote:
Are Missouri and Texas A&M hurting the SEC reputation?
Your fans dress like a bunch of goobers and you're worried about us damaging your reputation?
Posted on 10/13/13 at 10:16 pm to Rebel Land Shark
A&M and Mizzou haven't hurt the SEC.
SEC teams losing to Clemson and Miami has hurt the SEC reputation.
SEC teams losing to Clemson and Miami has hurt the SEC reputation.
Posted on 10/13/13 at 10:18 pm to tigafan89
Wat?
They say there's no such thing as a dumb question, but you may have just disproven that.
They say there's no such thing as a dumb question, but you may have just disproven that.
Posted on 10/13/13 at 11:39 pm to thefloydian
quote:
against an overrated Georgia team
If lowly Missouri beat 'em, then Georgia must've been overrated, especially in Athens where they had the SEC's longest active home win streak.
Your logic is air tight. Keep up the good work.
Posted on 10/13/13 at 11:42 pm to oR33Do
quote:
No it isn't. The reason you are cheering against A&M is because you are envious of us
Posted on 10/14/13 at 12:40 am to bigpapamac
quote:.
I wasn't trying to take anything away from the win yesterday, but it's not like I'm the only one in the country who has mentioned how banged up that Georgia offense is. As somebody else has said in this thread, Mizzou still only has 4 SEC wins, aside from UGA they've beaten UK, UT, and Vandy which is why I said maybe we should pump the breaks a little bit on them until they can follow up the UGA win with some more quality ones
The herp derp is strong all over this thread, but you sir are its apex.
Let me go slowly and use real simple words so you can understand what we are saying, k?
You say Mizzou win over Georgia not matter because lots of Georgia players had boo boos. Boo boos, you know, ouchies?
We point out that Mizzou very important players also had boo boos and we still outscored Georgia 13-0.
We point out that many many Mizzou very important players had ouchies last year. But that not matter to you when you slam us for how few wins we had last year. But when Georgia plays us when its players have ouchies, you say Georgia's ouchies matter.
That makes you full of shite.
Got it?
Good.
This post was edited on 10/14/13 at 12:51 am
Posted on 10/14/13 at 1:30 am to tigafan89
Yeah. 6-0 and 5-1 (with a TD loss to #1 Alabama) is really fricking up our image. At least last year we mudholed our OOC Bowl opponent. If anyone's hurting our rep, it's UGA and LSU losing to Clemson.
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News