Started By
Message
re: AJC: Can the SEC ever become a basketball league?
Posted on 3/16/16 at 6:39 pm to RTR America
Posted on 3/16/16 at 6:39 pm to RTR America
quote:your compatriot isn't much better
Holy shite I am constantly amazed by the total lack of basketball intelligence on this god damn board.
This post was edited on 3/16/16 at 6:40 pm
1
Posted on 3/16/16 at 6:39 pm to thefloydian
quote:I guess we should ignore that we've won 400 more games than them? You are clearly well educated on the subject. Please, enlighten us!
The only reason anyone would claim Kentucky is a better basketball program than UCLA is that they are a Kentucky fan. It's obvious by any metric you want to look at. It's not like Kentucky has been consistently dominant since the beginning of time. They sat out about 3 decades starting in the 60's.
Posted on 3/16/16 at 6:41 pm to thefloydian
quote:
You lost as soon as you started bringing up attendance.
That is part of program. None of the other blue blood teams have any thing close to the type of attendance issues UCLA has even in their worst down years.
Posted on 3/16/16 at 6:41 pm to RTR America
quote:
Holy shite I am constantly amazed by the total lack of basketball intelligence on this god damn board.
You will find plenty on of non-biased people out there that will tell you exactly that.
Based on what? Their feelings? Because any rational metric says it's UCLA. Your'e the one with a lack of basketball intelligence. I'm quoting history.
Posted on 3/16/16 at 6:42 pm to WestCoastAg
quote:
your compatriot isn't much better
Seriously?
Posted on 3/16/16 at 6:42 pm to RTR America
quote:and none of those programs compete with major professional sport franchises. LA is a pro city, like every single major metropolitan area in this country. Nor do any of those programs have to deal with a 2nd major college athletc program in their same city. That has shite to do with the programs accomplishments
None of the other blue blood teams have any thing close to the type of attendance issues UCLA has even in their worst down years.
This post was edited on 3/16/16 at 6:46 pm
Posted on 3/16/16 at 6:42 pm to RTR America
He isn't 
Posted on 3/16/16 at 6:44 pm to thefloydian
quote:
Based on what? Their feelings? Because any rational metric says it's UCLA.
No. It. Doesn't.
If you want to say UCLA had the greatest dynasty in basically any sport ever then go right ahead. That is perfectly reasonable.'
That one number doesn't suddenly mean they are best program of all time.
Posted on 3/16/16 at 6:44 pm to thefloydian
quote:Coleman Coliseum holds more than Pauley Pavilion. Holy frick I've got to educate you on your own fricking school too. Just do us a favor and stop posting about basketball.
You lost as soon as you started bringing up attendance.
Posted on 3/16/16 at 6:46 pm to WestCoastAg
quote:
and none of those programs compete with major professional sport franchises.
How many fricking people live in that area. A blue blood program should at least sort of fill up the damn arena.
Posted on 3/16/16 at 6:46 pm to thefloydian
quote:And again by using UCLA's math, Kentucky has the same number of championships. Being an Alabama guy I figure you'd understand something about this process. So what exactly is it they are dominating us at? Because we own them head to head and have won 400 more games. You're a real bright one, I'll tell you what.
Based on what? Their feelings? Because any rational metric says it's UCLA. Your'e the one with a lack of basketball intelligence. I'm quoting history.
Posted on 3/16/16 at 6:47 pm to RTR America
quote:if you want to say that UCLA hasn't had as much success since their run which keeps them from being the GOAT that's fine, but to say the program isn't one of the blue bloods is just idiotic
If you want to say UCLA had the greatest dynasty in basically any sport ever then go right ahead. That is perfectly reasonable
Posted on 3/16/16 at 6:48 pm to RTR America
quote:Precisely. Would anyone on here argue the Patriots are the best NFL franchise?
No. It. Doesn't.
If you want to say UCLA had the greatest dynasty in basically any sport ever then go right ahead. That is perfectly reasonable.'
That one number doesn't suddenly mean they are best program of all time.
Posted on 3/16/16 at 6:49 pm to WestCoastAg
quote:
if you want to say that UCLA hasn't had as much success since their run which keeps them from being the GOAT that's fine, but to say the program isn't one of the blue bloods is just idiotic
Which is what most normal people that have any appreciation of the sports history would tell you.
It is just an odd blue blood because of certain things that sort of add why it shouldn't be considered the best program.
Posted on 3/16/16 at 6:49 pm to RTR America
quote:it is such a different dynamic. The city isn't a college town. They care about the Lakers and the dodgers. USC has always had issues filling up the coliseum when they aren't playing ND or any high profile opponent. That doesn't make them any less of a football program
. A blue blood program should at least sort of fill up the damn arena
This post was edited on 3/16/16 at 6:51 pm
Posted on 3/16/16 at 6:50 pm to WestCoastAg
quote:The point is UCLA is not a better program than Kentucky. If you want to be a blue blood try showing up more than once in 100 years.
if you want to say that UCLA hasn't had as much success since their run which keeps them from being the GOAT that's fine, but to say the program isn't one of the blue bloods is just idiotic
Posted on 3/16/16 at 6:51 pm to UKWildcats
You seem really upset about this
Posted on 3/16/16 at 6:53 pm to WestCoastAg
No, just sleeping off my hangover from Sundays championship.
Posted on 3/16/16 at 6:53 pm to WestCoastAg
It's just weird. Last year it says y'all barely hit the 8,000 number in avg attendance. That is less than Bama had in Grant's last season.
Posted on 3/16/16 at 6:53 pm to UKWildcats
Lol u mad
Page 5 of 7
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News