Started By
Message

re: Aggies, explain to me some of those 90s teams

Posted on 6/30/17 at 7:05 pm to
Posted by Master Vader
Living in the minds of the weak
Member since Jun 2017
113 posts
Posted on 6/30/17 at 7:05 pm to
Once you pull away the covers of A&M bullshite you are not left with much to be impressed with

Every single statement on aggypedia has a source unlike anything Aggy puts out

Like I said there is the A&M truth. UT truth and the actual truth. The actual truth is much closer to UT's story than A&M's. They no longer have any credibility even in their new home
This post was edited on 6/30/17 at 7:06 pm
Posted by FourThreeForty
Member since May 2013
17290 posts
Posted on 6/30/17 at 7:06 pm to
A Texan playing FIFA is wrong.
Posted by Old Sarge
Dean of Admissions, LSU
Member since Jan 2012
55228 posts
Posted on 6/30/17 at 7:12 pm to
Strip club boobs are more real than the sec offenders sources
Posted by Master Vader
Living in the minds of the weak
Member since Jun 2017
113 posts
Posted on 6/30/17 at 7:13 pm to
I do not know about you but the excitement and electricity of college football can only be match by European soccer.

Everyone has their opinion but unless you play the game and try to learn it then your opinion is preconceived
Posted by Old Sarge
Dean of Admissions, LSU
Member since Jan 2012
55228 posts
Posted on 6/30/17 at 7:37 pm to
quote:

Texan playing FIFA is wrong.



He's no Texan, most of the students at that cow college are from out of state
Posted by CGSC Lobotomy
Member since Sep 2011
79994 posts
Posted on 6/30/17 at 7:41 pm to
quote:

Such a huge military base with 8100 people


I've been stationed at a military base that has significantly fewer people there than 8,100, but I guarantee you've heard of Fort Leavenworth. Their population is only 5,383 Active Duty.

Other well-known bases:

Ft. Meade - 9,350
Ft. Polk - 8,000-9,000
Ft. Rucker - 4,659
Ft. Huachuca - 5,600

By the way, if we're going by ACTIVE DUTY population, Schriever only has about 1,600 active duty, so which is it? Total Population or active duty?
This post was edited on 6/30/17 at 8:01 pm
Posted by Master Vader
Living in the minds of the weak
Member since Jun 2017
113 posts
Posted on 6/30/17 at 7:44 pm to
Because it is a prison and a training complex

Fort Riley is where the Active Duty Soldiers are in Kansas
Actually the home of the Big Red One
This post was edited on 6/30/17 at 7:45 pm
Posted by CGSC Lobotomy
Member since Sep 2011
79994 posts
Posted on 6/30/17 at 7:45 pm to
quote:

Fort Riley is where the Active Duty Soldiers are in Kansas
Actually the home of the Big Red One


The Disciplinary Barracks are not part of Ft. Leavenworth. They're located about 5 miles west. Ft. Leavenworth itself consists of the Command and General Staff College, Center for Army Lessons Learned, and other Maneuver Training Elements.

Funny you should mention Ft. Riley. It's population is just over 7,700, making it SMALLER than Schriever.
This post was edited on 6/30/17 at 7:47 pm
Posted by Master Vader
Living in the minds of the weak
Member since Jun 2017
113 posts
Posted on 6/30/17 at 7:47 pm to
Do you just throw shite in hopes of something sticking

When you do this people notice and makes your attacks less damaging and credible
Posted by CGSC Lobotomy
Member since Sep 2011
79994 posts
Posted on 6/30/17 at 7:49 pm to
quote:

When you do this people notice and makes your attacks less damaging and credible


You mean like trying to imply that a base is only important if it has over a certain active duty population?
This post was edited on 6/30/17 at 7:57 pm
Posted by Master Vader
Living in the minds of the weak
Member since Jun 2017
113 posts
Posted on 6/30/17 at 7:49 pm to
Wrong again the Active Duty population of Ft Riley is way over 20,000

The number you are using is the amount of people who live on the base.
I am going by the number of Active Duty soldiers stationed at each military installation
Posted by CGSC Lobotomy
Member since Sep 2011
79994 posts
Posted on 6/30/17 at 7:52 pm to
quote:

I am going by the number of Active Duty soldiers stationed at each military installation


You also said ALL of the active duty Soldiers in Kansas are at Riley. That states that not a single student in the Command and General Staff College is active duty, nor are the faculty, or those stationed in the Combined Arms Center, an obvious false statement.

As the entirety of Ft. Leavenworth is on the Kansas side of the border, you would be wrong.

Besides, it's not like you have any time in service anyway aside from playing Call of Duty, whereas I've been in long enough to remember when 1st ID moved from Kitsingen, Germany to Riley.
This post was edited on 6/30/17 at 7:56 pm
Posted by Master Vader
Living in the minds of the weak
Member since Jun 2017
113 posts
Posted on 6/30/17 at 7:57 pm to
Because A&M is such a patriotic university compared to the godless Marxist in Austin

I forgot you guys have changed the roles. So who is the patriotic school again..

If you truly look at the number of hires out of UT to the Department of Defense, Department of Justice, Department of Treasury, United States Intelligence Community and the Department of State you quickly see what university provides this country with public service and what university just plays soldier. Nothing wrong with 2nd Lt's. but they are pretty far down the chain of command.
This post was edited on 6/30/17 at 7:59 pm
Posted by Old Sarge
Dean of Admissions, LSU
Member since Jan 2012
55228 posts
Posted on 6/30/17 at 7:58 pm to
Goodness you are a racist mental midget
Posted by CGSC Lobotomy
Member since Sep 2011
79994 posts
Posted on 6/30/17 at 8:03 pm to
quote:

If you truly look at the number of hires out of UT to the Department of Defense, Department of Justice, Department of Treasury, United States Intelligence Community and the Department of State you quickly see what university provides this country with public service and what university just plays soldier. Nothing wrong with 2nd Lt's. but they are pretty far down the chain of command.


Now we see the agenda. Bitter relative of a GS who got his/her feelings hurt by an Aggie General Officer or Colonel. Reminds me of this idiot DoS individual (GS13) when I was stationed at the Embassy in Baghdad in 2006 who thought going through the proper channels (start point: O5) was beneath her so she sent messages directly to Secretary Rumsfeld because she thought her message wasn't coming across. It wasn't that her message wasn't getting through, it's that it had already been deemed by her supervisors to be not worth the time to even come across the Colonel's desk.

Quick question? What rank does a General Officer typically have 25+ years before becoming a General Officer? Do they just get appointed into the position straight out of school?

Quick PSA for the t-sip shitposters that keep downvoting...downvotes have no bearing on whether or not someone can post. This isn't that 3rd world website known as shaggytexas.
This post was edited on 6/30/17 at 8:08 pm
Posted by Master Vader
Living in the minds of the weak
Member since Jun 2017
113 posts
Posted on 6/30/17 at 8:11 pm to
I have not been around a military base so I do know how many A&M graduates make up the ranks
I can say when I was younger I was introduced to very few A&M graduates in the USMC.

Posted by texag7
College Station
Member since Apr 2014
37505 posts
Posted on 6/30/17 at 8:15 pm to
How old are you?
Posted by TbirdSpur2010
ALAMO CITY
Member since Dec 2010
134026 posts
Posted on 6/30/17 at 8:20 pm to
You are a fool.
Posted by CGSC Lobotomy
Member since Sep 2011
79994 posts
Posted on 6/30/17 at 8:21 pm to
quote:

I have not been around a military base so I do know how many A&M graduates make up the ranks


Or you could simply look up the numbers.

I came across my commissioning program and counted 79 alone that commissioned in May of 2000.

If you assume 3 commissioning ceremonies a year with the December and August ceremonies being about 2/3 and 1/3 of those numbers respectively, (an additional 79) that's nearly 200 officers just between December 1999 - August 2000 alone.

In any one year, the numbers of those commissioned fluctuate between 175 - 350 in any one commissioning year group. Assume a start point year of 1980 (assume anyone who commissioned before that is retired) using the mean between those two numbers for pre-September 11, 2001 and an average of 270 for thereafter and A&M has put in just under 10,000 officers in the last 37 years.
Posted by Master Vader
Living in the minds of the weak
Member since Jun 2017
113 posts
Posted on 6/30/17 at 8:24 pm to
These numbers have no bearing because they come out of your head
If you are an officer in the military like you claim you are. You should have these numbers already proven by different sources.
Either you are lazy or incompetent. If you are an actual officer I see why the Army is so far behind the Navy and Marines in everything right now.
first pageprev pagePage 6 of 9Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter