Started By
Message
re: Again, why does Auburn get to play UGA at home in back-to-back seasons?
Posted on 4/9/13 at 1:23 pm to Mo Jeaux
Posted on 4/9/13 at 1:23 pm to Mo Jeaux
quote:
There's only one person in this thread that has had to "leave out" things to advance their argument. Their user name begins with an "N" and ends with a "YCAuburn."
Your a moron if you cant see why it was left out.
I hope you saw what was left out of that, if not, there is no hope
1
Posted on 4/9/13 at 1:24 pm to Mo Jeaux
Posted on 4/9/13 at 1:24 pm to Indfanfromcol
Ask Bama they set the GD schedule for everyone, 
Posted on 4/9/13 at 1:24 pm to Indfanfromcol
quote:
4 divisions actually works out perfectly for permanent rivals. You have 3 permanent rivals that you play every year.
You play the 3 teams in your division, another division (that has one of your permanent rivals), then another team from each of the other divisions.
Would be interesting to see. But if we don't add 2 more teams soon, will the SEC just keep doing "bridge" schedules?
Posted on 4/9/13 at 1:25 pm to Indfanfromcol
quote:
4 divisions actually works out perfectly for permanent rivals
4 divisions really is the "bridge" we need. 14 teams, with the odd number 7 in each division is not a long term solution
Posted on 4/9/13 at 1:25 pm to spslayto
quote:
The Big 12 did it.
And you see what that did to Nebraska's feeling about the Big 12.
quote:
If the SEC adds any more members, I don't know how it would be possible to maintain these games. Play 7 in your division and 1 permanent? You'd never play anybody else outside of those 8 teams other than the championship game.
If/when we go to 16 teams, and if we divide them up into 2 divisions, then it'll basically be 2 separate conferences regardless. Even with 2 rotating cross divisional games with 8 team divions, would still only play every cross divisional teams every 8-10 years at the least. The only way to play cross division teams consistantly with a 16 team conference is to go to a pod system.
Posted on 4/9/13 at 1:27 pm to spslayto
quote:
Would be interesting to see. But if we don't add 2 more teams soon, will the SEC just keep doing "bridge" schedules?
Honestly, it isn't really even a bridge schedule we have now, they just used that term to make people feel good about getting screwed over with the schedule (UGA playing in auburn again)
We are pretty much back on a real schedule.
Posted on 4/9/13 at 1:28 pm to NYCAuburn
quote:
4 divisions really is the "bridge" we need. 14 teams, with the odd number 7 in each division is not a long term solution
I agree.
We should have added A&M and Mizzou, but let them start in the SEC when we found 2 more teams. Had they said that, I feel like 2 ACC teams would have jumped ship last year for the SEC.
Posted on 4/9/13 at 1:29 pm to Bamatab
quote:
Because they are rivalry games, and that is one of the things that make the college game so special. Just because LSU doesn't have any rivals, doesn't mean that rivalry games aren't an important part of college football.
lulz.
Posted on 4/9/13 at 1:30 pm to JoLeUGA
I know this is kinda off topic, but what exactly does REC stand for. I've been seeing it an a lot of post recently.
Posted on 4/9/13 at 1:30 pm to NYCAuburn
quote:
Your a moron
Never fails. Posted on 4/9/13 at 1:36 pm to tickfawtiger
quote:
he SEC schedulers would say/admit....well the tides' had the easier schedule the past 2 years so we'll "even it up" in 2014 and beyond....but nooooooo such luck
Wow, you really think that in the future Bama will only play the lower tier SECE teams while LSU will play the higher tier teams? Plus, do you really think the SEC office would insult it's members by saying that certain teams aren't as good of programs? Talk about a PR nightmare.
Posted on 4/9/13 at 1:37 pm to elit4ce05
quote:
Working with a full repertoire, I see.
Posted on 4/9/13 at 1:39 pm to Mo Jeaux
quote:
Mo Jeaux
quote:
Never fails.
guess you didnt read the next line.
Posted on 4/9/13 at 1:40 pm to NYCAuburn
OK.
Posted on 4/9/13 at 1:40 pm to Bamatab
quote:
If/when we go to 16 teams, and if we divide them up into 2 divisions, then it'll basically be 2 separate conferences regardless. Even with 2 rotating cross divisional games with 8 team divions, would still only play every cross divisional teams every 8-10 years at the least. The only way to play cross division teams consistantly with a 16 team conference is to go to a pod system.
Hopefully, this will get done. Without starting another thread on conference expansion, is there any realistic possibility that 2 more teams will be brought in soon?
Posted on 4/9/13 at 1:40 pm to rtr14
quote:
I know this is kinda off topic, but what exactly does REC stand for. I've been seeing it an a lot of post recently.
not sure if serious. are you an alum or sidewalker?
Posted on 4/9/13 at 1:41 pm to NYCAuburn
quote:
not sure if serious. are you an alum or sidewalker?
Student.
Posted on 4/9/13 at 1:41 pm to Mo Jeaux
quote:
OK.
So you did, yet neglected to read it before you made your response?
Posted on 4/9/13 at 1:42 pm to rtr14
quote:
Student.
So much to learn young one
REC, Red Elephant Club
This post was edited on 4/9/13 at 1:43 pm
Page 9 of 11
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News