Started By
Message
0
Posted on 4/9/13 at 12:18 pm to Bamatab
Do you think there's any "pressure" on tht sec/rec to finally pair bama with GA,SC or FL for the 2014 schedule ? OR, will it somehow magically begin with a MO,Vandy,KY "rotation" ?
I honestly think LSU's schedule will begin with a game @ SC and the SEC office will claim it's "just a conincidence" AGAIN ! LMAO
I honestly think LSU's schedule will begin with a game @ SC and the SEC office will claim it's "just a conincidence" AGAIN ! LMAO
Posted on 4/9/13 at 12:18 pm to tickfawtiger
quote:
LSU is NOT complaining about PAST SEC schedules...is was done on a rotating basis...do you understand ?
quote:
The gripes come in with the "bridge" schedules
You cant be serious. All you guys do is bitchi about BAma and having to play UF. Isnt the constant argument "Bama gets the easy teams every year? matter a fact I believe it was even stated in this thread
quote:
,the uncertainty of 2014 and beyond
complaining about the unknown future
whole nutta level of complainin' quote:
permanent opponent issue
boo fricking hoo, Did you see Auburn fans bitching when our two were UF and UGA? no, and Auburn want the UF game back
quote:
SEE no problem with PAST schedules
If you have no problem with past schedules, then why is okay for LSU but not okay for BAma?
quote:
Gees you are hard headed OR simply can't admit an error on your part !
You might want to read this for yourself, I'm okay
Posted on 4/9/13 at 12:19 pm to BoCam2
quote:
AU
quote:
beat UGA
Posted on 4/9/13 at 12:20 pm to Mo Jeaux
quote:
But NYCAuburn has already posted that he is ignoring the bridge schedules. Don't you get that? He's ignoring the raison d'etre of this thread. You have to, if you want to fit it into the "whining LSU fans" narrative. Get with the program.
I am sorry you are slow. maybe they will have some medication in the future to help with this
Posted on 4/9/13 at 12:22 pm to NYCAuburn
Rotation would dictate that Bama should play UGA again before LSU does. And if that had happened, I don't think we LSU fans would be complaining as much.
Posted on 4/9/13 at 12:24 pm to NYCAuburn
I am sorry you are slow.
Thanks. I appreciate that.
Maybe. Until then, I'll console myself by whining.
Thanks. I appreciate that.
quote:
maybe they will have some medication in the future to help with this
Maybe. Until then, I'll console myself by whining.
Posted on 4/9/13 at 12:24 pm to JoLeUGA
Are we really bitching about playing a down AU team on the road twice in a row?
Posted on 4/9/13 at 12:24 pm to NYCAuburn
quote:
If you have no problem with past schedules, then why is okay for LSU but not okay for BAma?
Talk about being slow!Posted on 4/9/13 at 12:25 pm to attheua
quote:
Overrun with LSU fans afflicted with LBS.
Clearly.
Posted on 4/9/13 at 12:26 pm to JoLeUGA
So that Bama doesn't have to play UGA, Florida, or South Carolina.
Posted on 4/9/13 at 12:28 pm to tickfawtiger
quote:
Do you think there's any "pressure" on tht sec/rec to finally pair bama with GA,SC or FL for the 2014 schedule ?
Oh, heck no.
quote:
OR, will it somehow magically begin with a MO,Vandy,KY "rotation" ?
If the REC is doing their dang job right we will.
But in all seriousness, I do think we are due to play UGA next year. I'd actually be surprised if we didn't. If we don't play UGA next year, then you can go ahead and pencil in Vandy.
Again, I think the 2014 will be another bridge schedule, even if they don't admit it.
This post was edited on 4/9/13 at 12:30 pm
Posted on 4/9/13 at 12:29 pm to Bamatab
Tennessee needs to get their shite together. They are really messing up any semblance of competitive balance with scheduling.
Posted on 4/9/13 at 12:30 pm to NYCAuburn
Let's put this another way you may be able to comprehend.
Last 5 years of SEC play: Bama has played the top 3 SEC East teams FL,GA,SC....4{FOUR} times and GA not at all
Last 5 years of SEC play: LSU has played the top 3 SEC East teams FL,GA,SC....8{EIGHT} times
You can't possibly tell me you don't see an "issue"....come on REALLY !
ADD to this...the SEC will not even "imply" that the 2014 schedule going forward, will even address this obvious imbalance !
Last 5 years of SEC play: Bama has played the top 3 SEC East teams FL,GA,SC....4{FOUR} times and GA not at all
Last 5 years of SEC play: LSU has played the top 3 SEC East teams FL,GA,SC....8{EIGHT} times
You can't possibly tell me you don't see an "issue"....come on REALLY !
ADD to this...the SEC will not even "imply" that the 2014 schedule going forward, will even address this obvious imbalance !
Posted on 4/9/13 at 12:30 pm to tickfawtiger
The absolute whiniest fanbase in the history of sports.
Posted on 4/9/13 at 12:32 pm to tickfawtiger
We all know this is the truth, but the Gumps will be here shortly to cry: "Rantards...crazy conspircy theories...can't help that Saban is god." 
Posted on 4/9/13 at 12:33 pm to NYCAuburn
quote:
You cant be serious. All you guys do is bitchi about BAma and having to play UF. Isnt the constant argument "Bama gets the easy teams every year? matter a fact I believe it was even stated in this thread
Damn serious. You are fricking delusional if you don't see the problem with Bama alum picking your schedule and loading it up with national contenders on the excuse of "bridge scheduling." We will be happy to play UGA, Bama, and UF if they commit to a similar level schedule. We don't give a shite if Auburn wants to play UF and UGA...
This post was edited on 4/9/13 at 12:35 pm
Posted on 4/9/13 at 12:33 pm to TideSatchel
quote:
The absolute whiniest fanbase in the history of sports.
Oh, yeah, almost forgot this one.
Posted on 4/9/13 at 12:34 pm to spslayto
quote:
Tennessee needs to get their shite together. They are really messing up any semblance of competitive balance with scheduling.
You ain't kidding. But I blame Tenn for a lot of other things as well. Like allowing Vandy to get any semblance of self confidence, and allowing USCe to actually take thier place in the top 3 of the east, thus allowing them to keep the best in state players. If it wasn't for UT's ineptness, Clowney possibly could be at Bama. UT definitely has a lot to answer for as of late.
Posted on 4/9/13 at 12:34 pm to spslayto
Let’s go off this schedule posted for the past four years and future one. I will break this out into a tier one and tier two category.
Tier 1
UF, UGA, USC
Tier 2
UK, UT, Vandy, Miz
I will take out the permanents(UT and UF) for their respective team, because the don’t change
Bama played/plays 4 tier 1 and 4 tier 2
LSU played/plays 3 tier 1 and 5 tier 2
Prior to the bridge
Bama tier 1 played 4 teams, tier 2 played 2 teams
LSU tier 1 played 1, tier 2 played 5
So sans the permanent(which is what changes in bham), LSU has really had the easier schedule
Tier 1
UF, UGA, USC
Tier 2
UK, UT, Vandy, Miz
I will take out the permanents(UT and UF) for their respective team, because the don’t change
Bama played/plays 4 tier 1 and 4 tier 2
LSU played/plays 3 tier 1 and 5 tier 2
Prior to the bridge
Bama tier 1 played 4 teams, tier 2 played 2 teams
LSU tier 1 played 1, tier 2 played 5
So sans the permanent(which is what changes in bham), LSU has really had the easier schedule
This post was edited on 4/9/13 at 12:36 pm
Page 6 of 11
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News