Started By
Message

re: A&M...why do you hate LSU so much??

Posted on 7/30/13 at 11:45 am to
Posted by CP3LSU25
Louisiana
Member since Feb 2009
51150 posts
Posted on 7/30/13 at 11:45 am to
quote:

You're presenting a hypothetical scenario where A&M was a worse team, and LSU was a better team. If LSU was better than A&M, maybe they wouldn't have lost to Clemson, but LSU wasn't a top ten team last year, so why are you arguing that hypothetical?


LSU has spanked y'all the last 2 games ouch
Posted by Choctaw
Pumpin' Sunshine
Member since Jul 2007
77774 posts
Posted on 7/30/13 at 11:45 am to
quote:

If LSU was better than A&M, maybe they wouldn't have lost to Clemson


Or we would've just beaten y'all on your home field instead of hanging on to a meaningless bowl game....amirite?

And you didn't answer my question
This post was edited on 7/30/13 at 11:47 am
Posted by wadewilson
Member since Sep 2009
36730 posts
Posted on 7/30/13 at 11:47 am to



I'm happy for him. It took him 4 games, but Richardson finally managed to score a touchdown against mighty LSU.
Posted by TeLeFaWx
Dallas, TX
Member since Aug 2011
29192 posts
Posted on 7/30/13 at 11:47 am to
quote:

Or we would've just beaten y'all on your home field instead of hanging on to a meaningless bowl game....amirite?


So was Texas A&M better than Alabama? Or are you admitting to the possibility of the existence of an upset?
Posted by CP3LSU25
Louisiana
Member since Feb 2009
51150 posts
Posted on 7/30/13 at 11:48 am to
quote:

TeLeFaWx



If you don't answer the question and keep trolling
Posted by TeLeFaWx
Dallas, TX
Member since Aug 2011
29192 posts
Posted on 7/30/13 at 11:50 am to
quote:

If you don't answer the question and keep trolling


What does your question have to do with who was a better team in 2012? I'm trying to stay topical. You won't answer my relevant questions...
Posted by CP3LSU25
Louisiana
Member since Feb 2009
51150 posts
Posted on 7/30/13 at 11:50 am to
quote:

So was Texas A&M better than Alabama? Or are you admitting to the possibility of the existence of an upset?


You're pathetic. You are holding onto beating a team which had no impact on college football because they ended up winning the NC.

No one cares or will remember that. Pathetic and hilarious. I'm glad we aren't bottom feeders like y'all.
Posted by Choctaw
Pumpin' Sunshine
Member since Jul 2007
77774 posts
Posted on 7/30/13 at 11:50 am to
That day...yes. Overall...no, because they finished with a better conference record and won the west.
Posted by CP3LSU25
Louisiana
Member since Feb 2009
51150 posts
Posted on 7/30/13 at 11:51 am to
quote:

What does your question have to do with who was a better team in 2012? I'm trying to stay topical. You won't answer my relevant questions...


The question was answered when Choctaw put the score up from Lsu vs A&m
You are trolling and should be
Posted by TeLeFaWx
Dallas, TX
Member since Aug 2011
29192 posts
Posted on 7/30/13 at 11:52 am to
quote:

You're pathetic.


I like you.

quote:

You are holding onto beating a team which had no impact on college football because they ended up winning the NC.


No, I'm just using the example of the upset. This thing y'all think is mythical of something. I'm just transplanting your logic to A&M and Alabama. In your opinion, who was a better team last year, Alabama or Texas A&M, and why? I say Alabama.

quote:

No one cares or will remember that.


Cool, I guess.

quote:

I'm glad we aren't bottom feeders like y'all.



Y'all weren't a top ten team last year. Where is the bottom to y'all?
Posted by TeLeFaWx
Dallas, TX
Member since Aug 2011
29192 posts
Posted on 7/30/13 at 11:52 am to
quote:

That day...yes. Overall...no, because they finished with a better conference record and won the west.


So conference record and the West is all that matters? Who was better in 2011, Alabama or LSU?
Posted by Choctaw
Pumpin' Sunshine
Member since Jul 2007
77774 posts
Posted on 7/30/13 at 11:53 am to
If the bowl game out outcomes had been reversed who would've been ranked higher? You're basing your entire premise on the outcome of a meaningless bowl game.
Posted by Choctaw
Pumpin' Sunshine
Member since Jul 2007
77774 posts
Posted on 7/30/13 at 11:54 am to
quote:

So conference record and the West is all that matters? Who was better in 2011, Alabama or LSU?


overall...LSU
Posted by TeLeFaWx
Dallas, TX
Member since Aug 2011
29192 posts
Posted on 7/30/13 at 11:54 am to
quote:

If the bowl game out outcomes had been reversed who would've been ranked higher? You're basing your entire premise on the outcome of a meaningless bowl game.


Who cares if they bowl game outcomes had been reversed? THey weren't. Y'all couldn't beat Clemson. You weren't a top ten team. Why is this so confusing? Do y'all think y'all were a top ten team or something? I'm so confused.
Posted by CP3LSU25
Louisiana
Member since Feb 2009
51150 posts
Posted on 7/30/13 at 11:55 am to
quote:

Y'all weren't a top ten team last year. Where is the bottom to y'all?


We have the most wins out of any school big conference since the BCS era. Lets look at A&M. The 70-0 game was amazing for y'all
Posted by TeLeFaWx
Dallas, TX
Member since Aug 2011
29192 posts
Posted on 7/30/13 at 11:55 am to
quote:

overall...LSU


There it is.
Posted by wadewilson
Member since Sep 2009
36730 posts
Posted on 7/30/13 at 11:55 am to
BCS rankings are subjective, and will be obsolete. Division and conference rankings do a much better job of judging the success of one's season. Our loss to Clemson ultimately does not matter. So, yes, A&M finished higher in a ranking that has no relevance and will not exist in it's current form after this season.

I know you're trolling, but I explained it anyway.
Posted by TeLeFaWx
Dallas, TX
Member since Aug 2011
29192 posts
Posted on 7/30/13 at 11:56 am to
quote:

We have the most wins out of any school big conference since the BCS era. Lets look at A&M. The 70-0 game was amazing for y'all


I'm not talking about the entire BCS area. You have got me there, and of that I will not argue. But I'm specifically talking about last season. You were not a top ten team. Do you think you were?
Posted by TeLeFaWx
Dallas, TX
Member since Aug 2011
29192 posts
Posted on 7/30/13 at 11:57 am to
quote:

BCS rankings are subjective, and will be obsolete. Division and conference rankings do a much better job of judging the success of one's season. Our loss to Clemson ultimately does not matter. So, yes, A&M finished higher in a ranking that has no relevance and will not exist in it's current form after this season.


It has no relevance? So LSU was better than Alabama in 2011? I didn't know all of y'all actually believed this.
Posted by CP3LSU25
Louisiana
Member since Feb 2009
51150 posts
Posted on 7/30/13 at 11:57 am to
quote:

BCS rankings are subjective, and will be obsolete. Division and conference rankings do a much better job of judging the success of one's season. Our loss to Clemson ultimately does not matter. So, yes, A&M finished higher in a ranking that has no relevance and will not exist in it's current form after this season. I know you're trolling, but I explained it anyway.


He's getting so destroyed it's hilarious. They haven't won a NC since the world war days
Jump to page
Page First 21 22 23 24 25
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 23 of 25Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter