Started By
Message
2
Posted on 12/27/12 at 10:36 pm to CavalryAg07
38-14
aka shitty
aka shitty
Posted on 12/27/12 at 10:37 pm to Gladius Veritas
Has Beleima even coached a game yet?
Posted on 12/27/12 at 10:37 pm to Gladius Veritas
quote:
I'd much rather have the pro style offense. Running the spread is for schools who have large talent decencies
A&M and Oregon have talent deficiencies?
Everything else you responded with is just conclusory with casting.
Posted on 12/27/12 at 10:37 pm to roadGator
yep saw that movie so we changed the script, still get railed and told we need another offensive guy
Rant logic strikes again
Rant logic strikes again
Posted on 12/27/12 at 10:37 pm to roadGator
Petrino's defenses have always been better than Brile's defenses, even at Louisville
I would've been pissed if we had hired Briles
I would've been pissed if we had hired Briles
Posted on 12/27/12 at 10:37 pm to Latarian
And the rant narrative matters how much when it comes to winning? After the first two years of Les Miles' tenure at LSU, the mouthbreather narrative was that he was Larry Coker. There were people that fricking stupid. They are irrelevant, just as are those who think briles is anything less than a stud.
Posted on 12/27/12 at 10:38 pm to Gladius Veritas
quote:
Running the spread is for schools who have large talent decencies
*slaps forehead*
Posted on 12/27/12 at 10:38 pm to Latarian
quote:
had we hired Briles the Rant narrative wouldve been "lol he can't play defense", "he sucks without RG3", etc
you might get a couple of dudes with their heads up their asses who talked shite but I would be extremely worried had Arky hired Briles. He really is that good.
Posted on 12/27/12 at 10:38 pm to DWag215
No, but it's true for the most part
They'd honestly be better served using a pro styles offense (especially A&M) because if you don't have that top flight QB you're still good
They'd honestly be better served using a pro styles offense (especially A&M) because if you don't have that top flight QB you're still good
Posted on 12/27/12 at 10:39 pm to cardboardboxer
It's true for most schools
Not every school obviously, but most
Not every school obviously, but most
Posted on 12/27/12 at 10:39 pm to Latarian
quote:
had we hired Briles the Rant narrative wouldve been "lol he can't play defense", "he sucks without RG3", etc
We heard that rhetoric with Sumlin. As I'm sure you can see, it haunts us to this day.
Posted on 12/27/12 at 10:40 pm to Dr RC
they guy is 57, who knows how long he'll hang around. he doesn't exactly have a lot of time to adjust to the SEC. After the last fiasco we need a younger coach with the potential to stay a while. Not someone who may not even succeed and if e does he'll be too old to sustain it over a long period of time.
Why can't the Rant grasp this?
Why can't the Rant grasp this?
Posted on 12/27/12 at 10:40 pm to Latarian
Rant logic??? If you had hired Briles that would have been the company line handed down from Sail Central. You know it, I know it, we all know it. 
Posted on 12/27/12 at 10:42 pm to Gladius Veritas
quote:
I would've been pissed if we had hired Briles
many were pissed we hired Sumlin ( Kaiser???) but now we are 10-2 and have a top 10 recruiting class with 3 of the top 20 defensive tackles in the nation committed. Sometimes it just fits, and i though Briles would fit like a glove at arkansas. I really don't mean to flame it's just MHO.
Posted on 12/27/12 at 10:42 pm to Dr RC
quote:
I would be extremely worried had Arky hired Briles. He really is that good.
I can understand why since Petrino owned your asses
Posted on 12/27/12 at 10:43 pm to Latarian
Lat, expound for me...
Arky is looking to get top 15 recruiting classes from what you and others have said. You are switching to pro-style. You are competing against LSU and Bama (both pro-style) and aTm. All of whom have top 5 classes. Do your facilities allow you to beat them with lesser athletes?
Arky is looking to get top 15 recruiting classes from what you and others have said. You are switching to pro-style. You are competing against LSU and Bama (both pro-style) and aTm. All of whom have top 5 classes. Do your facilities allow you to beat them with lesser athletes?
Posted on 12/27/12 at 10:44 pm to CavalryAg07
quote:
many were pissed we hired Sumlin ( Kaiser???) but now we are 10-2
Ehh Sherman always did have good offensive lines and Manziel's success was uncoachable, he's just a complete freak
quote:
and i though Briles would fit like a glove at arkansas. I really don't mean to flame it's just MHO
Yeah I know
It's just that I'm tired of playing shite defense
Posted on 12/27/12 at 10:44 pm to roadGator
There were many on here that didnt want Briles or Bielema but after seeing how much it pissed the Rant off when we praised him we've gone full sail on the Bertlove, in turn Rant turns even more anti-Bert. case in point: Draconian.
You of all people should be keen on our tactics by now.
You of all people should be keen on our tactics by now.
Posted on 12/27/12 at 10:44 pm to Latarian
quote:
Why can't the Rant grasp this?
maybe b/c everything you said sounds like a bunch of horse shite.
did Sumlin and a bunch of CUSA coaches have trouble adjusting?
Page 3 of 6
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News