Started By
Message
1
Posted on 6/9/15 at 11:03 am to TopHog1
quote:
You said 10/1
It's not.
It's 10.5/1
Nice recovery
Posted on 6/9/15 at 11:03 am to Phat Phil
This is bad. Real bad.
UT having a 5X better shot than Mizzou?
Ole Miss having a better shot than Georgia and 7X better shot than LSU?
Auburn being a 2:1 favorite?
I haven't been more confused by a preseason hype to that of Auburns since '09 Ole Miss.
UT having a 5X better shot than Mizzou?
Ole Miss having a better shot than Georgia and 7X better shot than LSU?
Auburn being a 2:1 favorite?
I haven't been more confused by a preseason hype to that of Auburns since '09 Ole Miss.
This post was edited on 6/9/15 at 11:05 am
Posted on 6/9/15 at 11:03 am to TopHog1
I support Chubb in the Fournette - Chubb battle, but I have zero confidence in hyped UGA running backs meeting their full potential.
Posted on 6/9/15 at 11:05 am to gamecocks22
quote:
Ole Piss 7-1
quote:FIFY
With Chad "Machine Gun" Kelly? Riiiight
Posted on 6/9/15 at 11:05 am to Phat Phil
I'll come right out and say it, I don't get the hype. All the talking points about Auburn I think are accurate, but more as a cautious optimism than what I expect. Such as improvement on defense.
I think/hope JJ will be solid but I'm not crowning him as elite yet. He'll be in completely different circumstances as a starter and we can see his hype come back down to earth as the season goes on.
What surprises me most about these is that Auburn isn't hailed as the best thing since sliced bread, but simply that our strengths/outlook stacks up so well against others. It makes me wonder (as someone not super familiar with the ins and outs of every teams) why they're expecting such a dropoff from a team like Alabama. I personally will assume they're the team to beat until we go 2-3 years in a row where they aren't champion.
I think/hope JJ will be solid but I'm not crowning him as elite yet. He'll be in completely different circumstances as a starter and we can see his hype come back down to earth as the season goes on.
What surprises me most about these is that Auburn isn't hailed as the best thing since sliced bread, but simply that our strengths/outlook stacks up so well against others. It makes me wonder (as someone not super familiar with the ins and outs of every teams) why they're expecting such a dropoff from a team like Alabama. I personally will assume they're the team to beat until we go 2-3 years in a row where they aren't champion.
Posted on 6/9/15 at 11:05 am to MSUbulldogs03
Agreed.
Posted on 6/9/15 at 11:05 am to lsusteve1
quote:Yeh the dumbass thought +1050 meant we were 1000/1.
Nice recovery
You could tell he had no cluePosted on 6/9/15 at 11:06 am to sjmabry
A) It's Chad Swag AK-47 Kelly
B) He is still far better than any of the shitty quarterbacks y'all are gonna trot out this fall
B) He is still far better than any of the shitty quarterbacks y'all are gonna trot out this fall
Posted on 6/9/15 at 11:06 am to Phat Phil
quote:
Tennessee 10-1
Arkansas 10-1
I find this absurd.
Posted on 6/9/15 at 11:07 am to Swoopin
quote:
I'll come right out and say it, I don't get the hype. All the talking points about Auburn I think are accurate, but more as a cautious optimism than what I expect. Such as improvement on defense.
I agree with the hype. I don't agree with 2-1 SEC odds hype (I know this isn't a serious proposal). The SEC is just too stacked for that clear consensus type of prediction.
Honestly, the only program who gets that treatment, and has earned it, is Alabama under Saban. FWIW I don't think they're really deserving of it this year, but I don't think anyone is.
This post was edited on 6/9/15 at 11:09 am
Posted on 6/9/15 at 11:07 am to lsupride87
Why would +1050 =1000?
You are literally a stupid boudin baw
You are literally a stupid boudin baw
Posted on 6/9/15 at 11:08 am to Tornado Alley
I'd say the West should look like Alabama as the favorites followed moderately closely by everyone else with no real significant differences.
Posted on 6/9/15 at 11:09 am to Phat Phil
Tennessee, OM, A&M, Mizzou, and Arky too high.
LSU and UGA too low
LSU and UGA too low
Posted on 6/9/15 at 11:09 am to Orangeswarm
quote:nice response you really got him with that doozy
I think you're the one that needs to get laid dude.
Posted on 6/9/15 at 11:10 am to TopHog1
quote:Because you showed you had no clue how to actually read odds
Why would +1050 =1000?
Posted on 6/9/15 at 11:10 am to Pettifogger
I'm optimistic but I'm not writing big checks about what Auburn will and won't do this year. I assume we'll be our normal selves on offense, but I hope we don't really miss a mobile quarterback (Jeremy Johnson is the most limited definition of mobile). Plus depth issues on key areas in defense makes me nervous about injury and/or how we perform against uptempo teams.
I expect to be in contention going into November but I just see too much parity this year to swing a big dick around.
I expect to be in contention going into November but I just see too much parity this year to swing a big dick around.
This post was edited on 6/9/15 at 11:11 am
Posted on 6/9/15 at 11:10 am to MSUbulldogs03
quote:
I'd say the West should look like Alabama as the favorites followed moderately closely by everyone else with no real significant differences.
I think it should be AU 1a, UA 1b, followed by Arky/Ole Miss.
Posted on 6/9/15 at 11:11 am to lsupride87
Your mom goes to college.
Posted on 6/9/15 at 11:11 am to gamecocks22
Someone tell me why I should care what a non gambling sports website has to say about title odds. Tennessee at 10/1 is hilarious
Page 2 of 8
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News