Started By
Message
re: 2 Yrs In, Which Program Has Most SuccessfuIly Integrated into the SEC: MU or A&M
Posted on 4/10/14 at 1:40 pm to parkjas2001
Posted on 4/10/14 at 1:40 pm to parkjas2001
quote:yep. we won the 2014 speedy noil recruitment championship
They do?
0
Posted on 4/10/14 at 1:42 pm to parkjas2001
quote:
That does not belong to A&M.
Sure it does. They get to claim they've had a heisman trophy winner in their history and that helps with recruiting.
Posted on 4/10/14 at 1:44 pm to Henry Jones Jr
Mizzou won the East, that is thier hardware.
A&M aint won shite.
A&M aint won shite.
Posted on 4/10/14 at 1:45 pm to parkjas2001
Just like Auburn won National runner up. #Hardware
Posted on 4/10/14 at 1:45 pm to mizzoukills
On the field? Probably Mizzou. Off of it as far as branding and marketing and recruiting? A&M easily. A lot of that is JFF though.
Posted on 4/10/14 at 1:46 pm to Fuegoqueso
quote:
Just like Auburn won National runner up. #Hardware
wut?
Posted on 4/10/14 at 1:50 pm to parkjas2001
national runner up is a hell of an honor. I'd be proud of that accomplishment.
Posted on 4/10/14 at 1:50 pm to parkjas2001
quote:such is life when one school is in a much easier division
Mizzou won the East, that is thier hardware. A&M aint won shite.
Posted on 4/10/14 at 1:51 pm to mizzoukills
Mizzou has, but our SEC-level upgrades are almost complete.
Posted on 4/10/14 at 1:51 pm to mizzoukills
A&M and it's not even close.
I guess that's Bc we have played them twice in football.
I guess that's Bc we have played them twice in football.
Posted on 4/10/14 at 1:52 pm to mizzoukills
Mizzou because they're cool. They're in the East.
Posted on 4/10/14 at 1:55 pm to Kentucker
quote:
yep. we won the 2014 speedy noil recruitment championship
Posted on 4/10/14 at 1:57 pm to Henry Jones Jr
quote:
Sure it does. They get to claim they've had a heisman trophy winner in their history and that helps with recruiting.
fyi, he's actually our 2nd Heisman winner. Also, there are 2 Heisman trophies given out. One goes to the player, one to the school. This is actually true of all the individual awards.
As to the question, I really don't know. I would say more people identify A&M with the SEC but it's really hard to tell from my vantage point. The A&M-SEC branding has been pretty successful though.
Posted on 4/10/14 at 2:03 pm to mizzoukills
I think both programs have made smoother transitions than many expected.
"Successfully integrated?" Not exactly sure what that means; but Mizzou has obviously advanced farther in football, if that's the rationale behind the question.
It's good to be here, regardless.
"Successfully integrated?" Not exactly sure what that means; but Mizzou has obviously advanced farther in football, if that's the rationale behind the question.
It's good to be here, regardless.
Posted on 4/10/14 at 2:05 pm to Al Bundy Bulldog
quote:
A&M and it's not even close.
Care to elaborate?
Posted on 4/10/14 at 2:12 pm to mizzoukills
I think Missouri had integrated better but Aggy has seen more benefits. College Station is such a weird place that I don't know if they will ever mesh with the SEC except for on the football field. Little brother goes to aTm and there are some strange cats out there.. He refers to them as "good ole'Ags". Missouri is more in line with the culture of the SEC but is hampered by their location and ability to recruit.
Posted on 4/10/14 at 2:16 pm to MC5601
quote:
College Station is such a weird place that I don't know if they will ever mesh with the SEC except for on the football field. Little brother goes to aTm and there are some strange cats out there
Preach on
This post was edited on 4/10/14 at 2:17 pm
Posted on 4/10/14 at 2:16 pm to MC5601
A lot easier to "integrate" when you're in the SEC East with a injured Georgia and the joke that was UF last season.
Posted on 4/10/14 at 2:17 pm to MC5601
I think the real question is how did the A&M/MU integration compare to the SC/Arky integration?
Page 2 of 6
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News