Started By
Message

re: New OC Predictions

Posted on 1/23/15 at 1:13 pm to
Posted by Prof
Member since Jun 2013
42620 posts
Posted on 1/23/15 at 1:13 pm to
quote:

Makes perfect sense. Stark contrast from the Dooley era. You can say what you will about Butch, but he has certainly brought the program back to a level where good coaches want to come again.


Absolutely. And damn is it nice hearing how attractive we are as opposed to what we heard during the post-Kiff/Dooley Era. It should be really interesting to see who we get as an OC or if we promote Coach Azzani. Our offense is ready to explode next season and coaches know that. I think the only thing that might limit our choices (besides wanting a schematic/system match) is the timing but there are plenty of good OC candidates out there.
This post was edited on 1/23/15 at 1:15 pm
Posted by InVolNerable
Member since Jan 2012
10203 posts
Posted on 1/23/15 at 1:29 pm to
quote:

Btw, I have some left over ribs and rice...it was delicious. I live at The Ball off Alcoa Hwy if you want a plate.

I prefer The Mouse's Ear.
Posted by Prof
Member since Jun 2013
42620 posts
Posted on 1/23/15 at 1:43 pm to
quote:

I prefer The Mouse's Ear.


With a side of penicillin.
Posted by Domination
Member since Mar 2009
1260 posts
Posted on 1/23/15 at 3:14 pm to
Back in the mid to late 90's they used to find at least one dead body there every year. I mean , I like looking at random tatas and all, but they ain't worth getting stabbed over.
Posted by Prof
Member since Jun 2013
42620 posts
Posted on 1/23/15 at 6:02 pm to
There's a list of several candidates at various sites but Mike DeBord is the hot name right now. He's not a splashy name but is one CBJ has history with and would likely make for a seamless transition if hired.

Among various other coaching jobs, he was Michigan's OC back when they won the national championship and was apparently one of the candidates Fulmer interviewed (we got the Clawfense instead).
Posted by Supravol22
Member since Jan 2011
14411 posts
Posted on 1/23/15 at 6:04 pm to
If people dislike the hire then it's a good hire.

We hated the Butch hire
Hated the Tyndall hire
LOVED the Sal hire

Need I say more?
Posted by Prof
Member since Jun 2013
42620 posts
Posted on 1/23/15 at 7:05 pm to
^^Whatever name comes up ahead of time our fans will freak over. Even if it's a magical candidate everyone likes when he's hired, after the first game our fans will freak over it. Isn't that the way it works?
Posted by volfan30
Member since Jun 2010
40949 posts
Posted on 1/23/15 at 8:13 pm to
My thoughts were

quote:

hated the Butch hire
LOVED the Tyndall hire
meh on the Sal hire


Would be meh on Debord as well.
Posted by NorthGAVol
Member since Sep 2011
8939 posts
Posted on 1/23/15 at 8:28 pm to
I hope Tommy B is wrong on Debord.
Posted by SavageOrangeJug
Member since Oct 2005
19758 posts
Posted on 1/23/15 at 9:40 pm to
This article makes a case for...

Calvin Magee
Posted by Supravol22
Member since Jan 2011
14411 posts
Posted on 1/24/15 at 11:13 am to
Here's a good post on VQ about Debord

quote:

Read this from another poster:

1- For the last five years this board has opined the lack of forethought that lead us to hire Derek Dooley instead of David Cutcliffe (as Wes has reported a few times, Cut turned us down because we wanted to micromanage his staff and because power players wanted a "sexier" hire, but we could have gotten him.) Instead, we got what we all wanted- a connection to the Saban tree. Then we got it again with Sal. You can add the Lane Train to the sexy hire pile. Also, Dave Clawson over better pro-style OCs because fans and boosters wanted a "west coast" offense and running QB like Florida

2. Debord is the David Cutcliffe of the Midwest. Maybe we should learn from our past. How much is he like Cut? He was the OC at Michigan from 97-99. He was undefeated and won a national championship in his first year and won two Big Ten titles during that run before he decided to parlay it into a head coaching job at CMU. (Sound familiar.) In 1997 he was the national assistant coach of the year.

3- The he comes back to Michigan (he was succeeded at CMU by Kelly and then Jones). He was on staff there but not the OC because Carr wouldn't shuffle the deck and move the OC who had replaced him. As a position coach he won another Big 10 title. Then in 06 he returns to the OC position and his first team makes it to the Rose Bowl. After Carr retires he looks just like David Cutcliffe after Phil to the Michigan faithful and so they go with the "sexy hire" instead, Rich Rod. You can find Michigan blogs that opine the fact that they hired Rich Rod instead of Debord.

4- QBs he groomed as an OC at Michigan- Tom Brady, Drew Henson, Brian Griese, and Chad Henne. All had great college careers. Every QB who started a game for him at Michigan played in the NFL. He also has a huge role in the career of Scott Lefler (now OC at V Tech). Scot Loefler was his QB coach at Michigan, then goes with him to CMU, then back to Michigan. When Debord (and Carr) leave Michigan he goes to Florida as QB coach for Meyer, then to the NFL when Urby "retires".

5- When Carr retires Debord goes to the pros. He works under Mike Holmgren (a legendary offensive coach) at Seattle, then Lovie Smith (a very good coach who has a successful track record) at Chicago. Mike Martz who was the OC for the Bears (who knows a thing or two about offense) and coaches on a team that goes to the NFC championship. He stays there until Smith gets canned in early 2013, but past the coaching hiring cycle. Overall he has coached tight ends or the o-line in 5 NFL seasons.

6- The only real problem anyone has with him is the fact that he took two seasons off- but did he really? Here are some other coaches who have taken seasons off- David Cutcliffe, Bill Snyder, Urban Meyer. He is 58, not 85. That means he is younger than Spurrier, Saban, Pinkel, and Les Miles. Roughly the same age as Miles and Richt. He isn't a dinosaur. Also, I'm not convinced he's just been hanging out at intramurals at UM. This job looks more like a way to add a football coach without counting him. Note that he was the interim in charge of the team after Hoke was dismissed (that doesn't sound like a guy who isn't involved in the program) and then he was involved in the hire of Harbaugh- that turned out OK. All of this to say- I have no idea why we are all so upset about the possibility of adding a coach who won a Natty as an OC to this staff, has coached every position on the offensive side of the ball, and helped groom Tom Brady. What does the guy at TCU, who has never called plays in a college game or the guy who won a lot of games at freaking Marshall, got that that's better than them?

This is not a "we need a recruiter" hire. We have recruiters. We need someone who is a winner, who brings stability, and who knows offense. The fact that he has that national championship ring and all those NFL contacts doesn't hurt either. I have no idea if Butch will hire him, but if our opinions about the coaches we have wanted on the message boards over the years are any measure of success (Muschamp, Strong, Sal, to name a few), then by gosh we should be thrilled that this guy is not someone any of us want. He's just a boring dude who has won a TON of HUGE games as an OC at a program very comparable to ours including a national title.
This post was edited on 1/24/15 at 11:15 am
Posted by Robert Goulet
Member since Jan 2013
9999 posts
Posted on 1/24/15 at 12:23 pm to
I know nothing about the guy except what I just read. I agree that we don't need a recruiter or "sexy" hire. I've always thought that Cut was the main reason for the long stretch of success and we all saw it when he came back before taking the Duke job. If this guy is like Cut, I'd be fine with it.

Eta: thanks for posting.
This post was edited on 1/24/15 at 12:25 pm
Posted by Prof
Member since Jun 2013
42620 posts
Posted on 1/24/15 at 2:11 pm to
If Debord is anything like that post suggests, I'm sold.
Posted by Legendary0903
Tree Fiddy Green Money
Member since Jan 2014
4416 posts
Posted on 1/24/15 at 2:22 pm to
quote:

If Debord is anything like that post suggests, I'm sold.



This.
Posted by InVolNerable
Member since Jan 2012
10203 posts
Posted on 1/24/15 at 3:23 pm to
quote:

I mean , I like looking at random tatas and all, but they ain't worth getting stabbed over.

Not with that attitude.
Posted by NorthGAVol
Member since Sep 2011
8939 posts
Posted on 1/24/15 at 4:04 pm to
If Debord was anything like Cutcliffe, he would be on Harbaugh's staff instead of stapling papers.

Someone on FL98 just destroyed that post.

quote:

That's a really bad post in the OP...makes a lot of leaps When Cutcliffe was being considered to replace Lane, he had on his resume: 7 years as a OC/QB coach at Tennessee, 5 years head coach experience at an SEC school where he was slightly successful, 2 years head coach experience at Duke By comparison, Debord has 3 years OC experience at Michigan, 4 years head coach experience where he sucked in the MAC, and all the other experience was as an OL or TE coach, that's it Those two coaches aren't even in the same stratosphere



In response to point #6

quote:

No, that's not the only real problem people have. In fact, him taking time off is the least of my worries

1. Has not demonstrated a spread style, meaning we would have to retool our ENTIRE offense and would likely lose recruits (Preston) who want to come here for the spread, or we'd have an OC who is learning the spread himself

2. He has 3 years as an OC during his THIRTY YEAR coaching career

3. His recruiting abilities are unknown and could be nonexistent

4. His NFL experience? 4 seasons as a TE coach, 1 as an ASSISTANT OL coach (the Seahawks were terrible then and won 9 games total while he was under Holmgren)

5. Does not compare to hires other teams in the SEC are making


quote:

Tom Brady was not a good college QB, that's why he got drafted in the 6th round

Drew Henson had a good senior season in 2000 but Mike Debord was the fricking head coach at CMU in 2000

Brian Griese had Debord as his OC for one year, the rest of the time Debord was coaching OL

Chad Henne had a terrific college career, his first two years were his best, unfortunately Debord was coaching Special Teams, then Henne's stats actually went DOWN his junior & senior season when Debord took over as OC

Whoever typed the OP just blurted stuff out and thought talking about it for a paragraph made it right
Posted by Legendary0903
Tree Fiddy Green Money
Member since Jan 2014
4416 posts
Posted on 1/24/15 at 4:31 pm to
Well that is an effective counterargument.

I hope we hire someone soon. I can't handle all of the speculation for much longer.
Posted by Prof
Member since Jun 2013
42620 posts
Posted on 1/24/15 at 6:35 pm to
With the way FL98 and other places are freaking out, I simply don't trust anyone's arguments unless I know them or I have time to verify them - people acting crazy/very extreme regarding this for some reason. There's no rational discussion of Debord at all that I've seen and I don't know enough about him yet to tell whether any of these rebuttals are accurate or not but a few of those points appear to be overstated (I can attack and downplay anyone's resume, FWIW - we all can and I think the VQ poster was comparing the career path of the two and in that case, Cut's leaving to take an HC job and not really doing that great the first time he tried being an HC is similar but the rebuttal jumps to a different point in time and attempts to compare considering Cut as an HC for us to this guy as an OC hire for us -- those aren't comparable situations but the career path thing is). Some of the points are worth considering (e.g. is his OC experience enough time?) but they're not balanced against some of things Debord has going for him either.

What really is weird though is that it's damn near hysteria over there and a few other places and for no rational reason that I can see. This seems to be about the only sane place when it comes to discussing him.

Debord may or may not be a good hire - I don't know but I haven't seen anything to support the mass panic either. At worst, this guy would be a 'meh' hire but he'd be replacing a statistically bad OC.

Appreciate any all stuff you guys dig up both pro and con. I'm definitely going to have to do more research on him though.
This post was edited on 1/24/15 at 8:26 pm
Posted by InVolNerable
Member since Jan 2012
10203 posts
Posted on 1/25/15 at 9:39 am to
Sure, resumes can be picked apart, but most people can at least point to a couple things of note. DeBord is 58 and he's never done anything of substance. Hiring a university's director of Olympic sports, or whatever the frick he is, as our OC would be the epitome of pathetic UT hires.

Let's go ahead and hire John Candy's corpse as our DC. It has experience coaching a bobsled team.
This post was edited on 1/25/15 at 9:43 am
Posted by Prof
Member since Jun 2013
42620 posts
Posted on 1/25/15 at 1:22 pm to
I'm not worried about him being 58 - Stripling is older and so are several SEC head coaches and we wouldn't be hiring him for his looks. I'm not even worried about him taking time off - Urban did that and well he's come back just as strong. What I'm worried about is can he run our offense? Does he fit? Is he a good hire for us at this time? Etc.

As far as note, doesn't he have a championship ring?
This post was edited on 1/25/15 at 2:33 pm
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter