Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message

SEC votes against 4 year schollys (but it passes anyway), for "incidental" costs

Posted on 1/17/15 at 5:33 pm
Posted by Methuselah
On da Riva
Member since Jan 2005
23350 posts
Posted on 1/17/15 at 5:33 pm
LINK

Hmm. Did processing people just get more difficult?
Posted by KCM0Tiger
Kansas City, MISSOURI
Member since Nov 2011
15521 posts
Posted on 1/17/15 at 5:37 pm to
Interesting to me that the 2 worst academic conferences (Big 12, SEC) voted against this, while the good academic conferences (ACC, Big 10, Pac 12) voted for it.
Posted by Porter Osborne Jr
Member since Sep 2012
40016 posts
Posted on 1/17/15 at 5:50 pm to
Won't matter. They'll still process people.
Posted by Ldrake53
Member since Feb 2013
2171 posts
Posted on 1/17/15 at 5:52 pm to
Grades will inexplicably suffer.
Posted by Porter Osborne Jr
Member since Sep 2012
40016 posts
Posted on 1/17/15 at 6:05 pm to
As will "benefits"
Posted by SavageOrangeJug
Member since Oct 2005
19758 posts
Posted on 1/17/15 at 6:23 pm to
Coaches better recruit wisely from now on.
Posted by RD Dawg
Atlanta
Member since Sep 2012
27300 posts
Posted on 1/17/15 at 6:29 pm to
quote:

Won't matter. They'll still process people.


I wish CMR "processed" kids...can't think one player that he's ran off for underperforming
Posted by SavageOrangeJug
Member since Oct 2005
19758 posts
Posted on 1/17/15 at 8:41 pm to
Probably the biggest news regarding college athletics in a long time, and it gets almost no replies.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter