Started By
Message

Which SEC School's success is most important for the Conference's health?

Posted on 12/28/14 at 2:02 pm
Posted by PelicanFan
Crossroads of the South
Member since Oct 2011
56 posts
Posted on 12/28/14 at 2:02 pm
LSU?
Alabama?
Tennesseee?
Florida?
Auburn?
Posted by Smoke Dogg
NWA
Member since Nov 2012
99 posts
Posted on 12/28/14 at 2:04 pm to
All
Posted by BallstotheWesleyWall
Swagosphere
Member since Jan 2014
9364 posts
Posted on 12/28/14 at 2:04 pm to
Anyone but Alabama, because Alabama fans get butthurt about not being the center of attention even when it is in jest.
Posted by danfraz
San Antonio TX
Member since Apr 2008
24550 posts
Posted on 12/28/14 at 2:12 pm to
Well its not UT, they've been horrid during the SEC's most impressive run football wise

from a total athletic perspective, it would probably be LSU or UF. They both have had success is most sports across the board so one of those two
Posted by nc14
La Jolla
Member since Jan 2012
28193 posts
Posted on 12/28/14 at 2:15 pm to
Is it now the Big 5? As long as someone has success the conference stays healthy.
Posted by AlaTiger
America
Member since Aug 2006
21120 posts
Posted on 12/28/14 at 2:15 pm to
LSU or Georgia.
Maybe both.

Reason being that Alabama will
always be the focus and Florida will have the attention from the East. You need LSU/Georgia to also be good to provide balance and depth and expand the base out of Alabama.

Posted by Sancho Panza
La Habaña, Cuba
Member since Sep 2014
8161 posts
Posted on 12/28/14 at 3:16 pm to
NONE
Posted by RT2391
Nashville
Member since May 2014
431 posts
Posted on 12/28/14 at 3:19 pm to
And what in the hell would an ohio st. fan know or care about the SEC?
This post was edited on 12/28/14 at 3:20 pm
Posted by reggierayreb
Germantown
Member since Nov 2012
16950 posts
Posted on 12/28/14 at 3:19 pm to
It really doesnt matter



MSU was #1 in the CFB Playoff Rankings for a large portion of the season and the SEC still thrived.


It's been said a thousand times but the conference is much bigger than 1 school


Posted by JesusQuintana
St Louis
Member since Oct 2013
33366 posts
Posted on 12/28/14 at 3:20 pm to
Doesn't matter.

Some will be up, some will be down but the SEC will always have the best depth of good teams any given years. Too many good programs that are committed to winning.
Posted by craigbiggio
Member since Dec 2009
31805 posts
Posted on 12/28/14 at 3:23 pm to
No one school matters more, as long as someone from the Big 6 is in contention. Bama is the biggest giant historically but they were down when the SEC's recent run of dominance began.
Posted by REBSontheRISE
Member since Nov 2008
4420 posts
Posted on 12/28/14 at 3:27 pm to
quote:

Anyone but Alabama, because Alabama fans get butthurt about not being the center of attention even when it is in jest.
Posted by bayou2003
Mah-zur-ree (417)
Member since Oct 2003
17646 posts
Posted on 12/28/14 at 3:28 pm to
I'd go with Florida because they are in a state with 2 ACC schools that are very popular.
Posted by REBSontheRISE
Member since Nov 2008
4420 posts
Posted on 12/28/14 at 3:30 pm to
quote:

LSU or Georgia. Maybe both. Reason being that Alabama will always be the focus and Florida will have the attention from the East. You need LSU/Georgia to also be good to provide balance and depth and expand the base out of Alabama.

Auburn, Ole Miss or state college/starksville could take LSUs place in the standings and the conference would not miss a beat. Proof of that is this season.
Posted by scrooster
Resident Ethicist
Member since Jul 2012
37579 posts
Posted on 12/28/14 at 3:35 pm to
South Carolina ... hear me out.

South Carolina had always been mediocre prior to joining the SEC. We always had great fans and financial support, but we've endeavored to be good in the SEC.

It's taken awhile in football but we're getting there. This season will be a blip in the overall scheme of things.

But South Carolina has done well in baseball, a sport in which we were good long before we joined the SEC. Basketball has been meh except for a few years, but again, we're getting there. Women's basketball is already there. Golf - we're almost there. Could happen anytime now. Anyways, my point is ...

My point is that if South Carolina does break-through as an overall program, then it bolsters the perception of the entire league probably more than any other. We're commonly referred to as a Cinderella type program, even at times a sleeping giant given our fan support, facilities, in-state talent in all sports, etc.

Becoming a member of the SEC 25 years ago was the greatest thing to ever happen to SC, but it could also be a real public relations boon to the conference overall in the long-run because SC's success will be credited to the league (SEC) as much as it ever will our fans' undying support after decades of mediocrity.

Paul Dietzel once said, this was back in the 70s when he was pushing for us to take Ga Tech's place and the reason he got us out of the ACC in the first place ... he said, "There is no better marriage than the one that would bring Gamecock fans and the SEC together, it would be a match made in heaven."

One day I believe Coach is going to be proved to have been prophetical - even though it's been tougher for SC than I believe he thought it was going to be - still yet, our fans and our program will not quit until we get there and, when we do, it will be completely because of our marriage to this conference heart and soul.

ETA: South Carolina is also important as we are the true buffer state, the battle zone if you will, between the SEC and the ACC (particularly the state of NC and Tobacco Road). If SC takes care of business with our regular match-ups vs ACC teams in all sports, it makes the SEC look that much better as well and also helps the SEC continue to recruit well in ACC states.
This post was edited on 12/28/14 at 3:37 pm
Posted by GeorgeReymond
Buckhead
Member since Jan 2013
10155 posts
Posted on 12/28/14 at 3:40 pm to
Ole Miss & MSU specifically haven't shown they can sustain success for numerous years (an argument for Auburn could be made too). Your 9-3 season isn't an exemplar & is a moot point in determining the long-term success of our conference
This post was edited on 12/28/14 at 3:43 pm
Posted by GumBro Jackson
Raleigh
Member since Mar 2011
3112 posts
Posted on 12/28/14 at 3:42 pm to
I think that as long any of the 14 schools are at/near the top of the polls then the conference is doing okay, but it does seem like having a Big 6 team a the top gives the conference a little more media coverage.
Posted by LSU GrandDad
houston, texas
Member since Jun 2009
21564 posts
Posted on 12/28/14 at 3:44 pm to
the conferences health entails a hell of a lot more than any one school can give to it. what about Kentucky? think the conferences health needs them. friggin' A. w/o LSU, USCe and MSU in baseball, our conference's health would be way down. in football, every team you have list has won a NC fairly recently but this conference damn sure needs Georgia too.
Posted by dbt_Geaux_Tigers_196
Dystopia (but well cared for)
Member since Mar 2012
25235 posts
Posted on 12/28/14 at 3:44 pm to
None in particular, imo.
Posted by BigBlue8Titles
Kentucky
Member since Nov 2014
2450 posts
Posted on 12/28/14 at 5:23 pm to
Which SEC School's success is most important for the Conference's health?

LSU?
Alabama?
Tennesseee?
Florida?
Auburn?

NOTA

Kentucky
This post was edited on 12/28/14 at 5:26 pm
Page 1 2
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter