Started By
Message

Article on Brent Venables

Posted on 12/3/14 at 3:03 pm
Posted by Farmer1906
The Woodlands, TX
Member since Apr 2009
50208 posts
Posted on 12/3/14 at 3:03 pm
Posted by CGSC Lobotomy
Member since Sep 2011
79978 posts
Posted on 12/3/14 at 3:09 pm to
BR;DR
Posted by TexasAg13
San Antonio de Béxar
Member since Jul 2013
5815 posts
Posted on 12/3/14 at 3:11 pm to
I'm definitely beginning to think that Foster may be the 2nd best option behind Boom.
Posted by Farmer1906
The Woodlands, TX
Member since Apr 2009
50208 posts
Posted on 12/3/14 at 3:22 pm to
I like Foster #1
Posted by Nguyening
SEMO
Member since Jun 2013
9057 posts
Posted on 12/3/14 at 3:36 pm to
Foster has never had athletes like he'd have here. WRECKING MFIN CREW
Posted by TbirdSpur2010
ALAMO CITY
Member since Dec 2010
134026 posts
Posted on 12/3/14 at 3:56 pm to
Interesting.
Posted by Warrior Poet
Living Rent-Free in Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2011
7956 posts
Posted on 12/3/14 at 3:57 pm to
all of this is true, but I do believe Venables would be able to enhance defensive recruiting and lock down top prospects almost as good as Sumlin can.

Bottom line we'd always have the talent with him at the helm.
Posted by Farmer1906
The Woodlands, TX
Member since Apr 2009
50208 posts
Posted on 12/3/14 at 8:29 pm to
quote:

all of this is true, but I do believe Venables would be able to enhance defensive recruiting and lock down top prospects almost as good as Sumlin can.

Bottom line we'd always have the talent with him at the helm.

I can agree with that, but if we're talking pure coaching up talent. Brent is a 6 or 7 while Foster is a 9.9. Snyder is a .03.
Posted by TeLeFaWx
Dallas, TX
Member since Aug 2011
29177 posts
Posted on 12/3/14 at 8:39 pm to
FWIW, my uncle that is really tied in to the Oklahoma program(two time all-American under Switzer during the back to back nattys in the 70s) thought he was a really high character guy.
Posted by Mirthomatic
Member since Feb 2013
4113 posts
Posted on 12/4/14 at 10:53 am to
LINK

You look at more sophisticated stats that attempt to measure the quality of a defense by considering quality of opponent faced, filtering out garbage drives, etc, and Venables comes out looking great nearly every time. For example, the 2010 season at OU, his Defensive Fremeau Efficiency Index is 4th highest in the nation. His first year at Clemson is the only year his DFEI is outside the top 20.

Considering all the factors, Venables is probably my first choice. He's a very good to great Xs and Os guy, and an even better recruiter. And the latter might mean more than we expect if we were to lose David Beatty as some rumors suggest might be a possibility.
Posted by CGSC Lobotomy
Member since Sep 2011
79978 posts
Posted on 12/4/14 at 10:58 am to
Who would we lose Beatty to?
Posted by Mirthomatic
Member since Feb 2013
4113 posts
Posted on 12/4/14 at 12:00 pm to
Beatty wants to be a HC. He's not even an OC here. Another school could offer him either position, and he'd be a threat to go.
Posted by ShaneTheLegLechler
Member since Dec 2011
60119 posts
Posted on 12/4/14 at 12:35 pm to
Especially if Spav leaves for a HC job I could see Beatty being his OC.
Posted by betweenthebara
nowhere
Member since May 2013
6183 posts
Posted on 12/4/14 at 12:44 pm to
Posted by Farmer1906
The Woodlands, TX
Member since Apr 2009
50208 posts
Posted on 12/4/14 at 1:08 pm to
quote:

Especially if Spav leaves for a HC job I could see Beatty being his OC.



Tulsa doesn't pay. He'd be taking a pay cut to be an OC at Tulsa. IMO that is a step down. He should however apply for the OC job with Sumlin if that happens. Not sure he's my pick, but I do not want to lose him off this staff.
Posted by Mirthomatic
Member since Feb 2013
4113 posts
Posted on 12/4/14 at 1:12 pm to
Posted by Iosh
Bureau of Interstellar Immigration
Member since Dec 2012
18941 posts
Posted on 12/4/14 at 1:16 pm to
This article does some pretty weird cherry-picking. Like, no shite you're going to give up a lot of rushing yards to UGA and GT, one is a triple option team, the other has Todd Gurley.

Also the GT loss wasn't on Venables, Clemson's D held them to four field goals and lost because of pick sixes. Really the only stinker of a performance on their resume this year is Georgia.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter