Started By
Message
How screwed would your team be if your QB was lost for season?
Posted on 10/21/14 at 8:59 am
Posted on 10/21/14 at 8:59 am
AU would lose a major component in marshall, but we have the best back up in Jeremy Johnson in the country, so I think we could still compete well.
Others not as much.
Others not as much.
17
Posted on 10/21/14 at 9:01 am to Pavoloco83
Marshall doesn't look too good on the road so I could see where JJ could jump right in there..
Posted on 10/21/14 at 9:02 am to Pavoloco83
I'm not sure we have a QB.
Posted on 10/21/14 at 9:02 am to Pavoloco83
Screwed either way
Posted on 10/21/14 at 9:02 am to Pavoloco83
extremely.
we'd still PROBABLY beat tech, CSU, and kentucky. Also florida just bc of the run game.
We'd lose to auburn.
we'd still PROBABLY beat tech, CSU, and kentucky. Also florida just bc of the run game.
We'd lose to auburn.
Posted on 10/21/14 at 9:03 am to Pavoloco83
is this a trick question?
Posted on 10/21/14 at 9:03 am to Pavoloco83
We wouldn't notice any significant drop off.
Posted on 10/21/14 at 9:06 am to Pavoloco83
Auburn would be undefeated right now, if we'd lost our starter 3 weeks ago.
Posted on 10/21/14 at 9:09 am to Pavoloco83
We'd probably be forced to get into the I formation and hand the ball off 50 times a game.
Posted on 10/21/14 at 9:11 am to Choupique19
Well considering our current QB is a former RB I think we'd be OK. We don't need much with the bunch of guys we got around him. Hell plug in our kicker. All he has to do is hand it off.
Posted on 10/21/14 at 9:35 am to Pavoloco83
:additionbysubtraction:
Posted on 10/21/14 at 10:08 am to Hardy_Har
quote:
Marshall doesn't look too good on the road so I could see where JJ could jump right in there..
Marshal is no different on the road than any other place. He is what he is…He played at the same level as Dak two weeks ago, but our defense wasn't as good in the red zone. Some might say he played better than Dak since his interceptions came on batted passes and not poor decisions and throws.
This post was edited on 10/21/14 at 10:10 am
Posted on 10/21/14 at 10:09 am to jvilletiger25
quote:
Auburn would be undefeated right now, if we'd lost our starter 3 weeks ago.
This is absurd.
Posted on 10/21/14 at 10:12 am to Pavoloco83
Depending on which QB you're talking about, we might actually be bett...ah, screw it. We wouldn't notice because we have several equally-inept QBs waiting the wings.
Posted on 10/21/14 at 10:14 am to randomways
Not screwed at all. Likely we'd get better
Posted on 10/21/14 at 10:17 am to Pavoloco83
LSU would probably be better.
Posted on 10/21/14 at 10:20 am to Pavoloco83
LSU could put our 3rd string RG in at QB and the offense would look exactly the same. Sad part is I don't think the ineptness is entirely on the QB.
Posted on 10/21/14 at 10:22 am to Pavoloco83
Posted on 10/21/14 at 10:23 am to Pavoloco83
I don't think it would change a thing, hell, we might be even better.
My dog could probably throw for 20 yards a game.
My dog could probably throw for 20 yards a game.
Posted on 10/21/14 at 10:26 am to Pavoloco83
quote:
AU would lose a major component in marshall, but we have the best back up in Jeremy Johnson in the country, so I think we could still compete well.
I remember when South Carolina was telling us they had the best backup in the country too.
Is there a better more proven backup qb than USC's Dylan Thompson
While Thompson is perfectly fine, I think they miss the intangibles that Shaw possessed. Everyone overlooks intangibles. I think Marshall brings a lot of things to the table that would be missed.
This post was edited on 10/21/14 at 10:30 am
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News