Started By
Message

Change for the better?

Posted on 8/9/14 at 9:44 am
Posted by bigdawg7780
SC
Member since Oct 2013
2790 posts
Posted on 8/9/14 at 9:44 am
Posted by bdv1974
Liberty, South Carolinananana
Member since Nov 2011
10593 posts
Posted on 8/9/14 at 9:51 am to
you dont have to be 300+ if you're strong and quick So maybe a good change
Posted by Damn Good Dawg
Member since Feb 2011
47325 posts
Posted on 8/9/14 at 9:57 am to
They weren't good when they were the fattest OL in the SEC (and NCAA...and NFL) so I'd rather them try for fit OL.
Posted by AlaCowboy
North Alabama
Member since Dec 2011
6945 posts
Posted on 8/9/14 at 9:59 am to
For offensive linemen, first step is all important. They must be quicker than the defense. If the OL gets position on the DL, they can guide the DL away from the ball. Let's hope the OL are getting proper agility drills so they can be in position.
Posted by davesdawgs
Georgia - Class of '75
Member since Oct 2008
20307 posts
Posted on 8/9/14 at 10:07 am to
Weight and size in general are positive aspects for OL if the player in question is in good shape and has the athletic ability to block opposing DL. If not, then the extra weight quickly becomes a liability. Apparently our coaches felt that we had too many linemen who could not effectively carry that much excess weight. We will see soon enough if our strategy pays off. If our OL starts getting bowled over then either the strategy failed or we simply haven't recruited well enough on the OL which I feel has been the case for some time now. Hopefully this new group can come together.
Posted by bigdawg7780
SC
Member since Oct 2013
2790 posts
Posted on 8/9/14 at 10:09 am to
When Denver was dominating running the football they were the smallest line in the NFL so I hope this helps
Posted by bee Rye
New orleans
Member since Jan 2006
33961 posts
Posted on 8/9/14 at 10:14 am to
quote:

When Denver was dominating running the football they were the smallest line in the NFL so I hope this helps

that was due to a zone blocking scheme though, does UGA run something similar?
This post was edited on 8/9/14 at 10:15 am
Posted by UGAporkchop
Loganville
Member since Feb 2014
129 posts
Posted on 8/9/14 at 10:27 am to
quote:

LINK /


Is this a trap?
Posted by samson'sseed
Augusta
Member since Aug 2013
2070 posts
Posted on 8/9/14 at 1:51 pm to
This is a big change in Richt's philosophy.

Usually, UGA has the biggest OLs.

The difference between 298 and 308 isn't that much. I wouldn't worry about a 10 pound difference.

Now, a 20 pound difference will matter. Teams that big will wear out defensive lines.

UGA won't be wearing defensive lines out, so their techniques better be good.
Posted by SoGaFan
Member since Jan 2008
5956 posts
Posted on 8/9/14 at 1:55 pm to
quote:

UGA won't be wearing defensive lines out, so their techniques better be good.


They will if they are running more hurry up spread which is what it sounds like Mason is more comfortable with.
Posted by deeprig9
Unincorporated Ozora, Georgia
Member since Sep 2012
64051 posts
Posted on 8/10/14 at 2:46 pm to
But mason isnt going to start.
Posted by davesdawgs
Georgia - Class of '75
Member since Oct 2008
20307 posts
Posted on 8/10/14 at 2:53 pm to
quote:

But mason isnt going to start.


And you know this how?
Posted by deeprig9
Unincorporated Ozora, Georgia
Member since Sep 2012
64051 posts
Posted on 8/10/14 at 4:15 pm to
Ok maybe mason starts but bauta takes it from him midseason.
Posted by WG_Dawg
Hoover
Member since Jun 2004
86500 posts
Posted on 8/10/14 at 4:24 pm to
Wanna bet?
Posted by deeprig9
Unincorporated Ozora, Georgia
Member since Sep 2012
64051 posts
Posted on 8/10/14 at 4:27 pm to
$1,000,000
Posted by WG_Dawg
Hoover
Member since Jun 2004
86500 posts
Posted on 8/10/14 at 4:34 pm to
Well I was being serious.

Barring injury or a 1/25, 0TD/4INT type of game, Mason is not getting replaced by Bauta.
Posted by deeprig9
Unincorporated Ozora, Georgia
Member since Sep 2012
64051 posts
Posted on 8/10/14 at 4:38 pm to
Right.

And in2013 no way uga loses to vandy and lets tech take them to overtime. And furthermore, winless auburn winning the sec.
Posted by WG_Dawg
Hoover
Member since Jun 2004
86500 posts
Posted on 8/10/14 at 4:44 pm to
The situations aren't remotely comparable. I'm talking about the clear cut, established starter being benched, you're talking about a team winning/losing games.

Posted by deeprig9
Unincorporated Ozora, Georgia
Member since Sep 2012
64051 posts
Posted on 8/10/14 at 5:18 pm to
Im talking about plebians thinking they have a clue about reality. Schools of catfood running from dynamite.
Posted by WG_Dawg
Hoover
Member since Jun 2004
86500 posts
Posted on 8/10/14 at 5:20 pm to
quote:

Im talking about plebians thinking they have a clue about reality


So the "reality", as you see it, is that a backup who has never taken a snap in a college game is going to (over the course of roughly 6 games) unseat our 5th year senior QB who has actually started and won games for us, and is the undisputed, unquestioned starter?

What exactly makes that reality?
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter