Started By
Message
Alternate All-Time Rankings (Just Using Win % And SoS)
Posted on 7/30/13 at 11:26 am
Posted on 7/30/13 at 11:26 am
Like I said before though, some of these look WAY off.
team total (win % + sos)
Michigan 1664.54 (732.91 + 931.63)
Notre Dame 1619.01 (733.03 + 885.98)
Alabama 1611.63 (712.43 + 899.2)
Texas 1575.92 (714.05 + 861.87)
Georgia 1566.03 (647.2 + 918.83)
Ohio State 1559.95 (716 + 843.95)
LSU 1540.29 (648.23 + 892.06)
Auburn 1536.3 (629.86 + 906.44)
Oklahoma 1526.39 (715.9 + 810.49)
Nebraska 1523.1 (703.57 + 819.53)
USC 1521.59 (701.47 + 820.12)
Tennessee 1514.7 (684.34 + 830.36)
Florida 1468.19 (632.34 + 835.85)
Georgia Tech 1463.54 (594.45 + 869.09)
Minnesota 1438.52 (569.5 + 869.02)
Texas A&M 1410.65 (601.01 + 809.64)
Illinois 1408.32 (516.16 + 892.16)
Michigan State 1382.59 (591.51 + 791.08)
Washington 1367.53 (611.11 + 756.42)
Arkansas 1362.28 (592.25 + 770.03)
Penn State 1361.41 (658.27 + 703.14)
UCLA 1344.24 (583.67 + 760.57)
Pittsburgh 1301.09 (575.1 + 725.99)
Miami 1285.1 (631.09 + 654.01)
Florida State 1260.21 (667.79 + 592.42)
Illinois 1408.32 (516.16 + 892.16)
team total (win % + sos)
Michigan 1664.54 (732.91 + 931.63)
Notre Dame 1619.01 (733.03 + 885.98)
Alabama 1611.63 (712.43 + 899.2)
Texas 1575.92 (714.05 + 861.87)
Georgia 1566.03 (647.2 + 918.83)
Ohio State 1559.95 (716 + 843.95)
LSU 1540.29 (648.23 + 892.06)
Auburn 1536.3 (629.86 + 906.44)
Oklahoma 1526.39 (715.9 + 810.49)
Nebraska 1523.1 (703.57 + 819.53)
USC 1521.59 (701.47 + 820.12)
Tennessee 1514.7 (684.34 + 830.36)
Florida 1468.19 (632.34 + 835.85)
Georgia Tech 1463.54 (594.45 + 869.09)
Minnesota 1438.52 (569.5 + 869.02)
Texas A&M 1410.65 (601.01 + 809.64)
Illinois 1408.32 (516.16 + 892.16)
Michigan State 1382.59 (591.51 + 791.08)
Washington 1367.53 (611.11 + 756.42)
Arkansas 1362.28 (592.25 + 770.03)
Penn State 1361.41 (658.27 + 703.14)
UCLA 1344.24 (583.67 + 760.57)
Pittsburgh 1301.09 (575.1 + 725.99)
Miami 1285.1 (631.09 + 654.01)
Florida State 1260.21 (667.79 + 592.42)
Illinois 1408.32 (516.16 + 892.16)
7
Posted on 7/30/13 at 11:27 am to USMC Gators
Is Michigan counting playing itself, when no one else had a football team, to come up with that SOS? 
Posted on 7/30/13 at 11:27 am to USMC Gators
I like this more
Posted on 7/30/13 at 11:29 am to USMC Gators
Made as a companion to this thread.
All-time rankings of SEC teams @ SECRant.com
All-time rankings of SEC teams @ SECRant.com
This post was edited on 7/30/13 at 11:30 am
Posted on 7/30/13 at 11:30 am to USMC Gators
Any list that has Michigan at #1 is stupid. They have played in a two-team league throughout their whole existence and consistently got beat by the far superior teams from the Pac-10. The Big Ten is (historically) the most overrated conference in college football.
Posted on 7/30/13 at 11:30 am to USMC Gators
Woah, Minnesota. Didn't see that coming.
Posted on 7/30/13 at 11:31 am to USMC Gators
GFY
Posted on 7/30/13 at 11:31 am to Dawg in Beaumont
they used to run shite
Posted on 7/30/13 at 11:31 am to USMC Gators
Some that really stand out are Illinois and Minnesota.
Minnesota has had some elite moments, in the 1930s mainly. They've pretty much sucked as bad as Vanderbilt since. They, in no way, should be ranked over Penn State
Illinois is the Arkansas of the Big Ten. Really good seasons every once in a while, but subpar most of the time
Minnesota has had some elite moments, in the 1930s mainly. They've pretty much sucked as bad as Vanderbilt since. They, in no way, should be ranked over Penn State
Illinois is the Arkansas of the Big Ten. Really good seasons every once in a while, but subpar most of the time
Posted on 7/30/13 at 11:32 am to CapstoneGrad06
quote:
Is Michigan counting playing itself, when no one else had a football team, to come up with that SOS?
Michigan has played several teams that are good throughout their history
Posted on 7/30/13 at 11:32 am to AMM AU9893
quote:
I like this more
Posted on 7/30/13 at 11:32 am to WestCoastAg
So what this shows us is that the SEC office must have formerly been in Nashville since Tennessee has had such an easy schedule historically.
Posted on 7/30/13 at 11:34 am to NYCAuburn
quote:
Michigan has played several teams that are good throughout their history
When your conference title has been one by two teams for the majority of the existence of said conference, it brings things into question. In much the same way as Oklahoma and Nebraska dominating the Big 6/8/12 for all those years.
Posted on 7/30/13 at 11:37 am to CapstoneGrad06
quote:
When your conference title has been one by two teams for the majority of the existence of said conference, it brings things into question. In much the same way as Oklahoma and Nebraska dominating the Big 6/8/12 for all those years.
They also have played Notre Dame quite a bit. And the big ten wasn't just a two team conference, yes those two have won about half of the titles, but that doesn't discredit the other teams they have played.
Posted on 7/30/13 at 11:41 am to NYCAuburn
quote:
And the big ten wasn't just a two team conference, yes those two have won about half of the titles, but that doesn't discredit the other teams they have played.
Which basically makes it a two-team conference.
Posted on 7/30/13 at 11:44 am to NYCAuburn
They've played Notre Dame 40 times in 130 years of football. With 14 of those before ND even became a national power.
I'm not questioning UM as a national power. I'm just questioning this notion that they've played a tougher schedule than any of the top program from the SEC.
I'm not questioning UM as a national power. I'm just questioning this notion that they've played a tougher schedule than any of the top program from the SEC.
Posted on 7/30/13 at 11:45 am to RollTide1987
quote:
Which basically makes it a two-team conference.
So they can't play themselves, so do yall really think their SOS is because of one team?
Some of yall bama fans have a disdain for UM because of their claims and standings, which is kind of comical considering
Posted on 7/30/13 at 11:50 am to USMC Gators
quote:
team total (win % + sos)
Michigan 1664.54 (732.91 + 931.63)
Notre Dame 1619.01 (733.03 + 885.98)
Alabama 1611.63 (712.43 + 899.2)
Texas 1575.92 (714.05 + 861.87)
Georgia 1566.03 (647.2 + 918.83)
Ohio State 1559.95 (716 + 843.95)
LSU 1540.29 (648.23 + 892.06)
Auburn 1536.3 (629.86 + 906.44)
Oklahoma 1526.39 (715.9 + 810.49)
Nebraska 1523.1 (703.57 + 819.53)
USC 1521.59 (701.47 + 820.12)
Tennessee 1514.7 (684.34 + 830.36)
Florida 1468.19 (632.34 + 835.85)
Georgia Tech 1463.54 (594.45 + 869.09)
Minnesota 1438.52 (569.5 + 869.02)
Texas A&M 1410.65 (601.01 + 809.64)
Illinois 1408.32 (516.16 + 892.16)
Michigan State 1382.59 (591.51 + 791.08)
Washington 1367.53 (611.11 + 756.42)
Arkansas 1362.28 (592.25 + 770.03)
Penn State 1361.41 (658.27 + 703.14)
UCLA 1344.24 (583.67 + 760.57)
Pittsburgh 1301.09 (575.1 + 725.99)
Miami 1285.1 (631.09 + 654.01)
Florida State 1260.21 (667.79 + 592.42)
Illinois 1408.32 (516.16 + 892.16)
bullshite. We all know Alabama has an easy schedule.
Posted on 7/30/13 at 12:01 pm to NYCAuburn
quote:
So they can't play themselves, so do yall really think their SOS is because of one team?
Some of yall bama fans have a disdain for UM because of their claims and standings, which is kind of comical considering
What? Just look at the OP. Alabama, Georgia, LSU, and AU have all regularly played one another along with three others ranked in the Top 15. UM regularly faced three of the Top 15.
Posted on 7/30/13 at 12:09 pm to CapstoneGrad06
quote:
What? Just look at the OP. Alabama, Georgia, LSU, and AU have all regularly played one another along with three others ranked in the Top 15. UM regularly faced three of the Top 15.
looking at the list provided. Michigan has played three of those teams more than 90 times each, Bama with one. They have played more games against good competition.
I just find it ironic yall try to discredit them so much because of their claims, especially being a bama fan. Every time Michigan is brought up in a top team list, yall attack
This post was edited on 7/30/13 at 12:10 pm
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News