Started By
Message
Gerhart > Ingram
Posted on 12/8/09 at 3:06 pm
Posted on 12/8/09 at 3:06 pm
Stats Overview Rushing Receiving Fumbles
YEAR ATT YDS AVG LNG TD REC YDS AVG LNG TD FUM LST
Gerhart
2009 311 1736 5.6 61 26 10 149 14.9 33 0 0 0
Ingram
2009 249 1542 6.2 70 15 30 322 10.7 69 3 0 0
Gerhart was 11 touchdowns better than Ingrahm excluding receiving Td's and even with those he is not even close. Also Ingrahm played one more game than Gerhart.
If germans well too damn bad
Edited for some sensitive gumps
YEAR ATT YDS AVG LNG TD REC YDS AVG LNG TD FUM LST
Gerhart
2009 311 1736 5.6 61 26 10 149 14.9 33 0 0 0
Ingram
2009 249 1542 6.2 70 15 30 322 10.7 69 3 0 0
Gerhart was 11 touchdowns better than Ingrahm excluding receiving Td's and even with those he is not even close. Also Ingrahm played one more game than Gerhart.
If germans well too damn bad
Edited for some sensitive gumps
This post was edited on 12/8/09 at 3:47 pm
12
Posted on 12/8/09 at 3:07 pm to RelientAA
Ingram
Posted on 12/8/09 at 3:07 pm to RelientAA
Posted on 12/8/09 at 3:07 pm to RelientAA
Posted on 12/8/09 at 3:07 pm to RelientAA
already knew this
Posted on 12/8/09 at 3:08 pm to beaver
Posted on 12/8/09 at 3:08 pm to RelientAA
Did you purposely misspell his name twice or do you think you're just being clever?
Posted on 12/8/09 at 3:10 pm to RelientAA
Is this against the same PAC 10 competition we've all been mocking for eight years?
Posted on 12/8/09 at 3:10 pm to RelientAA
Vote for Gerhart then. We don't care.
Ingram, 6.1 ypc, Total yards 1864
Gerhart, 5.6 ypc, Total yards 1885
I guess 21 yards is "not even close" in your mind.
Ingram, 6.1 ypc, Total yards 1864
Gerhart, 5.6 ypc, Total yards 1885
I guess 21 yards is "not even close" in your mind.
Posted on 12/8/09 at 3:11 pm to ILoveLamp
Sorry I can't spell.
Did you ignore the stats for a reason?
Did you ignore the stats for a reason?
Posted on 12/8/09 at 3:12 pm to Teague
quote:
I guess 21 yards is "not even close" in your mind.
You must have missed the part where I was talking about touchdowns
Posted on 12/8/09 at 3:12 pm to RelientAA
quote:
RelientAA
^^^Thinks the Pac10 is as good a conference as SEC^^^
Posted on 12/8/09 at 3:12 pm to RelientAA
BAMA SOS >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Stanford SOS 
Posted on 12/8/09 at 3:12 pm to RelientAA
Ingram - 18 TDs now.
You know, 3 against UF, the "number 1" defense in football.
But I guess LSU fans have a hard time recognizing what TDs against Florida look like.
Ingram > LSU
You know, 3 against UF, the "number 1" defense in football.
But I guess LSU fans have a hard time recognizing what TDs against Florida look like.
Ingram > LSU
Posted on 12/8/09 at 3:12 pm to RelientAA
Once I saw you can't spell when you've seen his name typed 1,254,678 times on here, I immediately questioned your intelligence.
So no.
So no.
Posted on 12/8/09 at 3:17 pm to ILoveLamp
Its ok just ignore what the stats say...I didnt say the Pac-10 is better than the SEC just saying he is more touchdowns and yards in one less game. Plus he isnt a gump
Posted on 12/8/09 at 3:18 pm to RelientAA
quote:
Plus he isnt a gump
Key phrase in all his posts... now and forever.
Posted on 12/8/09 at 3:18 pm to RelientAA
quote:
Plus he isnt a gump
And there it is.
Posted on 12/8/09 at 3:19 pm to RelientAA
quote:
Plus he isnt a gump
The truth comes out.
Posted on 12/8/09 at 3:20 pm to RelientAA
What does more games have to do with it? Ingram played an extra game and still had like 62 fewer attempts than Gerhart. I'm pretty sure Ingram could have as many rushing yards if we handed it to him as often. I'm also pretty sure he'd have more if he played Pac-10 defenses.
Pac-10 defenses this year are like Big XII defenses last year.
Pac-10 defenses this year are like Big XII defenses last year.
Page 1 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News