Started By
Message

re: Why was the Civil War fought?

Posted on 9/9/14 at 10:36 pm to
Posted by roadhouse
Chicago
Member since Sep 2013
2703 posts
Posted on 9/9/14 at 10:36 pm to
G. Southerners were starting to get all uppity and needed to be put in their place.
Posted by Dick Leverage
In The HizHouse
Member since Nov 2013
9000 posts
Posted on 9/9/14 at 11:24 pm to
A,B,C, and D. Slavery was the issue whose threads were interwoven into all causes of the Civil War. From State's Rights to the Economic friction between The Industrial manufacturing North and the wealthy Aristocratic planter class of the South. Throw in political friction as it pertained to expansion and the creation of new States and the escalating congressional power struggle between the two regions. Both regions were determined to gain the Congressional upper hand through the creating of new States sympathetic to their side. Money and power concerns from the wealthy on both sides resulted in jealousy and mis-trust ......which resulted in the Civil War. Slavery was front and center because in the Northern Industrialists eyes it created an unfair economic advantage as well as an advantage in Congressional seats for the South due to the 3/5 compromise. The southern aristocracy felt that without slavery, they would be devastated both economically and politically in Congress.

The two best events to research thoroughly to understand how all of those things tied together is The Missouri Compromise and the Kansa/Nebraska Act.

The war was waged due to Slavery for sure. However, not for the "feel good" reasons that most people were taught in school. The Northern State's were as racist , if not more so , than their Southern counterparts. All one needs to do is to research "Black Codes" to see how terribly racist most of Northern society really was. Start with the BLack Code of Mr. Lincoln's own State of Illinois to see the hypocrisy.
Posted by AUCatfish
How are yah now?
Member since Oct 2007
13995 posts
Posted on 9/10/14 at 10:32 am to
quote:

The war was waged due to Slavery for sure. However, not for the "feel good" reasons that most people were taught in school


Exactly.
This post was edited on 9/10/14 at 10:33 am
Posted by rootisback
Member since Mar 2014
3371 posts
Posted on 9/10/14 at 2:49 pm to
cause them Yankees!
Posted by Mizz-SEC
Inbred Huntin' In The SEC
Member since Jun 2013
19236 posts
Posted on 9/10/14 at 7:11 pm to
quote:

Why was the Civil War fought?


So their great-great grand kids would be pissed when Missouri joined the SEC.
Posted by Landmass
Member since Jun 2013
18107 posts
Posted on 9/10/14 at 9:18 pm to
There are many many reasons. Why did Lincoln march on fellow Americans?
Posted by Carolina Tide
Atlanta
Member since Jul 2013
5747 posts
Posted on 9/10/14 at 9:33 pm to
quote:

F. Magma


Posted by CSATiger
The Battlefield
Member since Aug 2010
6220 posts
Posted on 9/11/14 at 2:16 am to
quote:

I'm pretty sure that, by 1821, no state north of the Mason-Dixon line or the Ohio River allowed slavery.

Correct.


Not quite. The 1860 Slave schedule showed there were still some slaves in NJ. West Virginia was admitted to the Union as a slave state in 1863.
Also, when the war started, there were 7 slave states in the Confederacy and 8 in the Union
. It was only after Lincoln,s call for troops to invade the South that the other states seceded.
Posted by Gcockboi
Rock Hill
Member since Oct 2012
7689 posts
Posted on 9/11/14 at 4:40 am to
B and C

The war of northern aggression wasn't fought over slavery, remember the winners are who writes the history books.
Posted by AUBorn
Itumpka Youtumpka Wetumpka, AL
Member since Aug 2013
933 posts
Posted on 9/11/14 at 8:47 am to
To create a cohesive south in order for the dominance of SEC football to arise. Isn't everything about football?
Posted by makersmark1
earth
Member since Oct 2011
15794 posts
Posted on 9/11/14 at 1:29 pm to
Slavery was central to the War.

Slavery had economic implications and also was the main "states rights" issue.

Slavery certainly was a big deal in Lincoln's election.

Magma was not really a contributing factor.


Posted by makersmark1
earth
Member since Oct 2011
15794 posts
Posted on 9/11/14 at 1:36 pm to
quote:

hat, by 1821, no state north of the Mason-Dixon line or the Ohio River allowed slavery. Missouri was added as a slave state with Maine being added as a counterbalance in Congress (so to speak), while California was added as a free state in response to Texas being added as a slave state


In 1863, there were slaves in Maryland, Delaware and Kentucky. That is why the Emancipation Proclamation stipulates, "states in conflict with the union". The slaves in Delaware were not freed until the 13th Amendment passed after the war
Posted by TeLeFaWx
Dallas, TX
Member since Aug 2011
29179 posts
Posted on 9/11/14 at 1:39 pm to
Money. Anti-slavery movement didn't come out of the north. It came out of the midwest. Midwestern farmers couldn't compete with southern plantations. Not even plantations. 3 or 4 slaves gave you a competitive advantage over midwesterners. Southerners wanted slaves because it was the cheapest labor out there, and it's what they already had. They didn't like the Yankees trying to take away their profit margins. Lincoln was from the midwest and anti-slavery. He was elected and those in Dixie saw the writing on the wall. Then South Carolina declared its secession.

/thread
Posted by Stonehog
Platinum Rewards Club
Member since Aug 2011
33330 posts
Posted on 9/11/14 at 1:40 pm to
quote:

None of the above.

All wars are fought for control of the economy.


You don't think slaves affected the economy?
Posted by Vols&Shaft83
Throbbing Member
Member since Dec 2012
69902 posts
Posted on 9/11/14 at 1:45 pm to
quote:

Magma was not really a contributing factor.





You shut your whore mouth
Posted by AUCatfish
How are yah now?
Member since Oct 2007
13995 posts
Posted on 9/11/14 at 1:46 pm to
quote:

Magma was not really a contributing factor.


Blasphemer!
Posted by wadewilson
Member since Sep 2009
36528 posts
Posted on 9/11/14 at 1:53 pm to
E. Other

The proliferation of NAMBLA. North American Man Boy Love Association. Northerners desperately wanted this freedom for all Americans and the southerners, stuck in their Bible-beating ways, refused to accept this.

So why, after the north won, do we not see man-boy love as a widely accepted practice and constitutional right? Because black Americans did what they always do with hot button issues - twisted everything around and made it all about black people problems.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 3Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter