Started By
Message

re: What is your opinion of the Federal Reserve System?

Posted on 6/17/15 at 6:54 pm to
Posted by BarberitosDawg
Lee County Florida across causeway
Member since Oct 2013
9914 posts
Posted on 6/17/15 at 6:54 pm to
I answered a similar question awhile back by advocating a multi pronged currency platform.

A.) leave the fiat currency as it is.

B.) put precious metal value back into coins and then offer paper dollar denominations in gold and silver based on these values.

A fifty dollar 2015 eagle is worth $1,186.45 per ounce or coin fiat dollars as of 06-17-2015 19:45.

A silver eagle 1 dollar coin 2015 bullion is worth $16.15 per ounce or coin in this case.

Have the Federal reserve start a vault-51 safe storage and start a third currency in the bit coin style.

These currency's don't have to compete as we win in any case it just makes our county three times as valuable...

IMO.
Posted by TideJoe
Member since Sep 2012
939 posts
Posted on 6/17/15 at 6:55 pm to
The people that make up the Federal Reserve power are well educated, but they're all power hungry, elite types. They'll live in a modest (relative to their wealth) home and look like a upper middle-class American, but that's an illusion. These guys are all Wall St types. Some of them belong to the Bilderberg Group, which is a group of the world's elite 150-200 people that are trying to drive the world economy. They are well qualified for the job, but almost all of the Fed power brokers have serious conflicts of interest.
Posted by bbvdd
Memphis, TN
Member since Jun 2009
24991 posts
Posted on 6/17/15 at 7:50 pm to
quote:

Well, it's a fact. Money supply =\= actual money. The treasury dept prints money and banks create and destroy money with loans. Of course, the fed dictates the money supply to the banks.


Actually it's not a fact. The Fed orders money from the treasury.

Also, when the fed is buying billions of dollars in treasuries and mortgage backed securities from the market, where do you think that money goes?
Besides that banks are not making anywhere near as many loans as they would like. They're having to invest into bonds which are at yields that are so low that banks are having a hard time making money right now. I'm mostly talking about regional and community banks.
Posted by Robert Goulet
Member since Jan 2013
9999 posts
Posted on 6/17/15 at 8:32 pm to
That's a very interesting idea and exactly what I was looking for.

Excuse my ignorance, but is your general idea that if the fiat money fails then the commodity-based would pick up the slack and vice versa? Also, would the Bitcoin type be mostly used for online type stuff?

Posted by Robert Goulet
Member since Jan 2013
9999 posts
Posted on 6/17/15 at 8:37 pm to
I understand what you're saying but it is an absolute fact that the fed doesn't print money. It's all good though, no need to argue semantics.

Those bonds and stuff go to control inflation/deflation and help dictate whether we need a contractionary or expansionary policy at the time. I agree with you and touched on that in a reply earlier in regards to the interest rate on those bonds. They really need to be raised because I think they're sitting at about 1% right now and you're right, banks can't make money off that.
Posted by deeprig9
Unincorporated Ozora, Georgia
Member since Sep 2012
64001 posts
Posted on 6/17/15 at 8:38 pm to
quote:

is your general idea that if the fiat money fails then the commodity-based would pick up the slack and vice versa?


The way I read it, the paper dollar would be based on the coins, which is based on the commodity. Therefore, the dollar is based on commodity, and not really fiat.

Dollars would still be used online. Bitcoin only exists for illegal activity. Criminals need currency too, and until recently governments can't/wont regulate it. Can't get busted for money laundering if you are using bitcoins, et al.
Posted by deeprig9
Unincorporated Ozora, Georgia
Member since Sep 2012
64001 posts
Posted on 6/17/15 at 8:57 pm to
quote:

I agree with you and touched on that in a reply earlier in regards to the interest rate on those bonds. They really need to be raised because I think they're sitting at about 1% right now and you're right, banks can't make money off that.


Couple of things..

The only rate set by the Fed is the Federal Funds Rate. When the Fed talks about raising and lowering rates, that's what they are talking about. It's the rate they charge to banks they send money to. Having a low federal funds rate is actually really good for banks. Those banks can still charge whatever they want to their borrowers.

Treasury bond rates are set by the US Treasury. These are traded by yield, rather than rate, because the bond market includes not only brand new bonds, but existing bonds. On the bond market, you can buy an older bond from someone else who bought a 30 yr bond five years ago. Therefore, if the 10 yr bond rate offered by the treasury 5 years ago was 6%, and the same bond today was offered "brand new" for 2%, why the hell would you buy a new bond? At the same time, why would a seller sell you their 6% bond at face value when the offering rate today is only 2%? He's going to charge a premium. Without getting more complex, that's why bonds are traded on yield rather than the printed rate of return on the bond.

The yield on the 10yr Treasury bond is what dictates mortgage rates, because mortgage securities are backed by the federal government same as Treasury bonds, so the risk profile is identical. Why would an investor buy mortgage backed securities with a 3 % return if they can buy the same risk profile for a 5% return? And vice versa. The 10 yr T-bill yield dictates mortgage rates in the market.


That's all I wanted to say at this point. Yall carry on.

This post was edited on 6/17/15 at 8:59 pm
Posted by Robert Goulet
Member since Jan 2013
9999 posts
Posted on 6/17/15 at 9:23 pm to
Thank you for posting all that.

So how was the low fed funds rate so instrumental in causing the recession? Is it one of those short term good, long term bad sort of things? I guess the bush tax cuts and ramped up war spending probably didn't help much either.

I had no idea that the 10 year bond dictated mortgage rates...that seems to make sense.

Feel free to say as much as you wish, I enjoy reading stuff from people who know what they're talking about.
Posted by deeprig9
Unincorporated Ozora, Georgia
Member since Sep 2012
64001 posts
Posted on 6/17/15 at 9:33 pm to
quote:

So how was the low fed funds rate so instrumental in causing the recession?


It wasn't.


quote:

I guess the bush tax cuts and ramped up war spending probably didn't help much either.


Drop in the bucket. Meaningless.



The recession was part of a chain reaction that all started with Hurricane Katrina, believe it or not.

The housing bubble was just kerosene on the wood pile. And the root of that situation started with the Tech Bust in the 90's. The treasury tanked bond rates to try and get more investors back into the stock market after the Tech Bust. Easy to drop rates, hard to raise them. The secondary result of dropping bond rates was falling mortgage rates. That led to housing bubble.


Then, Katrina came along. What happenned then, regarding oil speculators, and the dominos that fell after that event, deserves another topic entirely. I have to go to bed now.




Posted by bbvdd
Memphis, TN
Member since Jun 2009
24991 posts
Posted on 6/18/15 at 11:27 am to
Money Supply since 1/2010



quote:

The Board of Governors (the Board), as the issuing authority for Federal Reserve notes, approved and submitted its fiscal year (FY) 2015 order for 7.2 billion Federal Reserve notes, valued at $188.7 billion, to the U.S. Treasury Department’s Bureau of Engraving and Printing (BEP) on July 22, 2014.1

The 7.2 billion notes included in the FY 2015 order reflect the Board’s estimate of net demand for currency from domestic and international customers. The print order is determined, by denomination, based on historical payments to and receipts from circulation, destruction rates, and also to build inventories of new-design notes before issuance. Historically, most of the notes that the Board orders each year replace unfit currency that Reserve Banks receive from circulation.2 The estimated number of notes that Reserve Banks will destroy accounts for nearly 85 percent of the proposed FY 2015 print order and includes both unfit currency, as well as all old-design $100 notes received from circulation. The expected growth of Reserve Bank net payments (payments less receipts) to circulation primarily accounts for the remainder of the notes in the FY 2015 print order. The table below reflects the denominational breakdown of the Board’s FY 2015 order.3

Denomination Number of Notesa
(000s of pieces) Dollar Value
(000s of dollars)
$1 2,451,200 $2,451,200
$2 32,000 $64,000
$5 755,200 $3,776,000
$10 627,200 $6,272,000
$20 1,868,800 $37,376,000
$50 220,800 $11,040,000
$100 1,276,800 $127,680,000
Total 7,232,000 $188,659,200



I really am not trying to argue but to say the Fed doesn't creat money is just wrong. Treasury prints it for the Fed.
Posted by SamuelClemens
Earth
Member since Feb 2015
11727 posts
Posted on 6/18/15 at 12:23 pm to
FRS = NWO
Posted by bbvdd
Memphis, TN
Member since Jun 2009
24991 posts
Posted on 6/18/15 at 1:39 pm to
Just one more. If you weren't aware the Fed is still in the mkt buying paper. $5.91B+ last week


quote:

Gross purchases from June 11 through June 17: $5,910 million
Sales (dollar rolls) from June 11 through June 17: $0 million
Net purchases from June 11 through June 17: $5,910 million
Posted by Robert Goulet
Member since Jan 2013
9999 posts
Posted on 6/18/15 at 1:53 pm to
quote:

Treasury prints it for the Fed.



I never argued this, friend. I was simply saying that they don't actually print money like people think. This isn't Zimbabwe. I am well aware that they dictate monetary policy and they mainly manipulate the economy through short-term bond purchases. I think we are talking about the same thing.

I was also reading earlier that they are still leaving the fed fund rates the same, thus further increasing the supply of money and continuing the expansionary approach.
Posted by bbvdd
Memphis, TN
Member since Jun 2009
24991 posts
Posted on 6/18/15 at 2:23 pm to
quote:

I was also reading earlier that they are still leaving the fed fund rates the same, thus further increasing the supply of money and continuing the expansionary approach.


Yes, the announcement was y-day. Left both the Federal discount rate and the fed funds rate the same.

The Fed actually controls two rates.

Discount Rate is: The interest rate set by the Federal Reserve that is offered to eligible commercial banks or other depository institutions in an attempt to reduce liquidity problems and the pressures of reserve requirements. The discount rate allows the federal reserve to control the supply of money and is used to assure stability in the financial markets.

Fed funds is: a rate of interest for short-term interbank loans, adjusted periodically by a committee of the Federal Reserve System

The discount rate is 0.00% and the Fed funds rate is 0.25%
Posted by Jobu93
Cypress TX
Member since Sep 2011
19211 posts
Posted on 6/18/15 at 3:07 pm to
the problem with the Fed is that it isn't Federal. It's a shadow organization.

Back in 1913, Wilson had made a compromise, and that compromise was for a decentralized banking system but it was also supposed to meet the populace's ideas. THAT second portion has eroded away, and it was alarmingly quick.

The people who pushed for the Fed Reserve were, wait for it, the BANKS.

The very notion of the Fed Reserve is akin to having a Fox guard the hen house.

Posted by BarberitosDawg
Lee County Florida across causeway
Member since Oct 2013
9914 posts
Posted on 6/18/15 at 6:31 pm to
quote:

Dollars would still be used online. Bitcoin only exists for illegal activity. Criminals need currency too, and until recently governments can't/wont regulate it. Can't get busted for money laundering if you are using bitcoins, et al.


That's not true at all... It was the scare tactic the Feds used in trying to kill it but, it's visionary and in all our futures in some evolved form.

Bitcoin is a safe way to do business in the third world and actually get paid....

Check out Bayside Corp
OTCMKTS: BYSD - sometime and get smart.

Now our country has held different currency types before. Gold and Silver certificates were common place pre 1964.

Why not base a currency on our global military capability instead of the GNP?

Every country owes us a percentage of its GNP for the last seventy years based on the security we have and still provide for free....

They won't pay us willingly and we won't use our influence at the world bank in making them accountable so, base a new currency on what we project.

We are the only country in the world with so many options available bar none.
Posted by deeprig9
Unincorporated Ozora, Georgia
Member since Sep 2012
64001 posts
Posted on 6/18/15 at 6:58 pm to
You just blew my mind.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 3Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter