Started By
Message

re: The leftie bible, "Rules for Radicals," have you ever read the dedication?

Posted on 7/3/15 at 11:02 pm to
Posted by scrooster
Resident Ethicist
Member since Jul 2012
37613 posts
Posted on 7/3/15 at 11:02 pm to
quote:

Republicans


Ummmmm .... if you interpreted this thread to be about Republicans and Democrats then you need to work on your comprehension skills.

This thread is about the leftie bible. There are plenty of scum bag lefties in the Republican party.

Lindsay Graham for instance ... John McCain is another.

This thread is about the professed dedication to the concept of Lucifer, the prince of darkness, by the left.

Believing in God or the devil is inconsequential to the discussion .... except for the fact that Lucifer represents evil and the left dedicates to his cause. And they do-so openly and with pride.

It's indicative of the current destructive nature of our society.
Posted by Legendary0903
Tree Fiddy Green Money
Member since Jan 2014
4416 posts
Posted on 7/3/15 at 11:20 pm to
Anyone ever played Dante's Inferno?

Satan had a huge arse weiner in the last battle scene of the game.
Posted by BigOrangeBri
Nashville- 4th & 19
Member since Jul 2012
12277 posts
Posted on 7/4/15 at 5:44 am to
This is what an angry, bitter, sad, old man looks like.

And lol at people that are slaves to the two party system. Government has you right where they want you.

Seriously, turn off the news channels and don't get swept up in this bullshite.
Posted by TeLeFaWx
Dallas, TX
Member since Aug 2011
29179 posts
Posted on 7/4/15 at 8:01 am to
quote:

Seriously, turn off the news channels and don't get swept up in this bullshite.


They will claim they hate it, but they are the perfect pawns. They think the opposing side is "evil". There is no compromise with these people. I'll never vote Democrat, and I disagree with a lot of their policies, but that doesn't mean they don't have legitimate gripes and good compromise can't be found.
This post was edited on 7/4/15 at 8:04 am
Posted by scrooster
Resident Ethicist
Member since Jul 2012
37613 posts
Posted on 7/4/15 at 8:24 am to
quote:

This is what an angry, bitter, sad, old man looks like.


lulz .... oh, I see you've read Rules for Radicals and you debate using those strict rules?

BOB, I am neither bitter, angry or sad - but it does say so much about you that you would perceive me to be so because of this conversation.

Again, lulz. I guess the strategy has served your political philosophy well, so far, so why not stick with it in every aspect of your life, huh?

Oh you leftie kids

quote:

And lol at people that are slaves to the two party system. Government has you right where they want you.


On that we may agree provided you expound upon it a bit by perhaps delving into what a couple of our founding fathers had to say about the dangers of a two-party system, (hint: Adams and Washington), and why the two party system has led us to this dysfunctional government we have today.

Oh wait, that's probably beneath you - too elementary - amirite? You'd rather simply jump straight to the same old leftie insults.

Again, lulz, this time at your hypocrisy. You claim to abhor the two-party system yet you have no qualms with, no, better yet, you instinctively resort to tactics taught you by the very liberal lefties educational system, the one who dedicates itself to Lucifer, called-out in this thread.

quote:

Seriously, turn off the news channels and don't get swept up in this bullshite.



"This bullshite" is from which "news channels" may I ask?
Posted by TeLeFaWx
Dallas, TX
Member since Aug 2011
29179 posts
Posted on 7/4/15 at 9:07 am to
quote:

On that we may agree provided you expound upon it a bit by perhaps delving into what a couple of our founding fathers had to say about the dangers of a two-party system, (hint: Adams and Washington), and why the two party system has led us to this dysfunctional government we have today.


The two party system is fine. We've had a three party system before and it let in Woodrow Wilson, and a hyperconservative like you would probably recognize him as one of the worst Presidents we've ever had. Coalitions, 5 parties. All that European shite isn't any better. The problem with our government now is the Federal Reserve, rampant corporatism, entitlements, the Military Industrial Complex, Healthcare(not Obamacare, what we had before that), and Obama's shitty energy policy. Not two parties. Two parties is such a red herring I can't respect anyone's intelligence that spends their time worrying about that.
Posted by scrooster
Resident Ethicist
Member since Jul 2012
37613 posts
Posted on 7/5/15 at 9:00 pm to
... but you see, no one gives a fat baby's arse about whom it is that you respect when it comes to any perspective or philosophy.

Labeling me an ultra conservative just illustrates your fricktardedness and the high level thereof.

I do agree with certain specific elements of your perceived reality .... it's adolescent, even sophomoric, yet I suppose even a blind pig finds an acorn from time to time.

Then there is your red-herring hypocrisy concerning The Fed.

I do get a kick of how quickly you ultra leftie socialist communists redirect the discussion away from your dedications to Lucifer.
Posted by crispyUGA
Upstate SC
Member since Feb 2011
15919 posts
Posted on 7/5/15 at 9:28 pm to
There are entire thesieses from Religion masters/phd students about how Lucifer, the angel of light, was and is the diety who always tries to help human beings while Yaweh was and is a dick and trickster who conned to humans into despising lucifer. Interesting shite, really. Very compelling arguments.
This post was edited on 7/5/15 at 9:29 pm
Posted by scrooster
Resident Ethicist
Member since Jul 2012
37613 posts
Posted on 7/5/15 at 9:51 pm to
Link or gtfo.
Posted by The Spleen
Member since Dec 2010
38865 posts
Posted on 7/6/15 at 7:46 am to
The topic of this book actually came up in a philosophical discussion I had with my very leftist friend this weekend. We both commented that neither of us knew anyone that has read the book, and it seems the majority that have are conservatives.
Posted by Vols&Shaft83
Throbbing Member
Member since Dec 2012
69902 posts
Posted on 7/6/15 at 7:50 am to
quote:

The topic of this book actually came up in a philosophical discussion I had with my very leftist friend this weekend. We both commented that neither of us knew anyone that has read the book, and it seems the majority that have are conservatives.





I think that if most leftists read the leftist bible, they would cease to be leftists.
Posted by scrooster
Resident Ethicist
Member since Jul 2012
37613 posts
Posted on 7/6/15 at 8:22 am to
quote:

The topic of this book actually came up in a philosophical discussion I had with my very leftist friend this weekend. We both commented that neither of us knew anyone that has read the book ...


Did you actually type that with a straight face?

quote:

... and it seems the majority that have are conservatives.


lulz. Did you actually type that, as well, with a straight face?

You really need to just stfu sometimes. I really despise liars who think they are smart liars.

Let's see, you know of know one who has read it?

Hillary Clinton has read it to the point she's memorized it. The Alynsky/Rodham letters are famous.

Barrack Obama has mentioned the book and the author in both of his books, as being "his community organizer bible."

Michelle Obama, in her 2008 DNC speech, evoked Alynsky as Barrack and her's playbook, their guide to changing things.

It's been required reading for every high school and college in the country, since Obama took over, who are taking the federally funded Community Organizer classes through his initiative.

Here, you wanna see the required reading list for yourself?

Posted by The Spleen
Member since Dec 2010
38865 posts
Posted on 7/6/15 at 8:26 am to
quote:

You really need to just stfu sometimes.



Heed your own advice, old man.
Posted by TeLeFaWx
Dallas, TX
Member since Aug 2011
29179 posts
Posted on 7/6/15 at 8:29 am to
quote:

I do agree with certain specific elements of your perceived reality .... it's adolescent, even sophomoric, yet I suppose even a blind pig finds an acorn from time to time.


If you agree with any part of my reality, that worries me.
Posted by scrooster
Resident Ethicist
Member since Jul 2012
37613 posts
Posted on 7/6/15 at 8:57 am to
quote:

Heed your own advice, old man.


Why? I'm not the one trying to bullshite someone with some claim of topic irrelevance via some conversation you claim to have had with some imaginary friend of yours over the weekend.

Why do you young lefties claim to have so many people, standing behind you, supporting your every notion? That's your proof? You spew some bullshite then claim there is someone in your pocket or on your shoulder supporting your bullshite claim.

No wonder this world is so fricked-up these days. lulz

In the meantime, why the dedication to lucifer in the preface of the leftie playbook?

Not one of you lefties has even attempted an answer.
Posted by scrooster
Resident Ethicist
Member since Jul 2012
37613 posts
Posted on 7/6/15 at 8:59 am to
quote:

If you agree with any part of my reality, that worries me


Only this part ...

quote:

The problem with our government now is the Federal Reserve, rampant corporatism, entitlements, the Military Industrial Complex, Healthcare(not Obamacare, what we had before that), and Obama's shitty energy policy.
Posted by The Spleen
Member since Dec 2010
38865 posts
Posted on 7/6/15 at 9:05 am to
quote:

I'm not the one trying to bullshite someone with some claim of topic irrelevance via some conversation you claim to have had with some imaginary friend of yours over the weekend.



And you know this conversation didn't take place how? Or that my friend is imaginary?

quote:

Why do you young lefties


I'm 42, so not really young anymore.


I've never read the book, and never met anyone who has. Don't care to read it. The majority of people I see that claim to have read it are conservatives. Make of that what you will. You seem really angry.
Posted by Duke
Twin Lakes, CO
Member since Jan 2008
35610 posts
Posted on 7/6/15 at 9:11 am to
The tactics are dirty. They drive identity politics and the shouting down of opposing views without consideration because of who is pushing them.

Rooster just doesn't want to admit politicians of every stripe in every country use these tactics, not just leftists. Leftists are just the ones more connected to Saul and his book. The tactics inside though are used by all to try and control the narrative.

Conservative have made liberal a dirty word. Liberals have turned bigot into an attack word on the right. They all play the same game and to the same ends.
Posted by arcalades
USA
Member since Feb 2014
19276 posts
Posted on 7/6/15 at 9:19 am to
quote:

the separation of Church and State
interesting use of words. I wonder if you know why.
Posted by TeLeFaWx
Dallas, TX
Member since Aug 2011
29179 posts
Posted on 7/6/15 at 1:07 pm to
So all of it except the Federal Reserve, eh? Sorry, I don't think financing our problems(mainly trying to create full employment, and how's that working out?) with inflation and artificially low interest rates is a responsible Monetary Policy.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter