Started By
Message

re: Obama's speech.

Posted on 9/10/14 at 9:46 pm to
Posted by UMTigerRebel
Member since Feb 2013
9819 posts
Posted on 9/10/14 at 9:46 pm to
Posted by Vols&Shaft83
Throbbing Member
Member since Dec 2012
69902 posts
Posted on 9/10/14 at 9:51 pm to
It's not funny, it's super duper cereal. We'll see who's laughing when you're hooked up to an e-meter taking personality tests in front of your children.


Posted by Alahunter
Member since Jan 2008
90738 posts
Posted on 9/10/14 at 9:51 pm to
I didn't want to see or read what he had to say, but after I saw a couple of references to what he supposedly said.. I had to look.

This administration is the biggest shite show I've ever seen in the White House. I don't know if there has been less respect for his position of power, a President's policies and a clear and overriding feeling of dismissiveness of the President, both at home and internationally than there is now.
Posted by 3nOut
Central Texas, TX
Member since Jan 2013
28876 posts
Posted on 9/10/14 at 9:52 pm to
quote:

Now let’s make two things clear: ISIL is not Islamic. No religion condones the killing of innocents, and the vast majority of ISIL’s victims have been Muslim. And ISIL is certainly not a state.



What he means is that these here are them douchebag Islamists.

Like we got your normal Christians and your douchebag Christians. Normal Christians go about their day. Them douchebag Christians want to stop them there queers from marrying and have control over the women folk's body.
This post was edited on 9/10/14 at 9:54 pm
Posted by PrivatePublic
Member since Nov 2012
17848 posts
Posted on 9/10/14 at 9:52 pm to
quote:

quote: Now let’s make two things clear: ISIL is not Islamic. No religion condones the killing of innocents.


Well duh, none of their victims are innocent.
Posted by Alahunter
Member since Jan 2008
90738 posts
Posted on 9/10/14 at 9:54 pm to
quote:

What he means is



"mmm.. you remind me of Reggie.."
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
111513 posts
Posted on 9/10/14 at 10:08 pm to
Lawd he sucks.
Posted by Roger Klarvin
DFW
Member since Nov 2012
46507 posts
Posted on 9/10/14 at 10:09 pm to
quote:

he keeps stupid, terrible people around him.


This combined with the fact that he was woefully under-qualified for the position is really the crux of the matter.

He seems like a nice enough guy on a personal level, but politically he is strictly a puppet. Not he is unique in this, but EVERYTHING he does is dictated by the establishment that backs him.
Posted by BillyBobPorkin
Stump Toe, Ar
Member since May 2014
1082 posts
Posted on 9/10/14 at 10:11 pm to
quote:

And in two weeks, I will chair a meeting of the UN Security Council to further mobilize the international community around this effort.


From his speech tonight, UN fuuuuuuuuucked.
Posted by Alahunter
Member since Jan 2008
90738 posts
Posted on 9/10/14 at 10:11 pm to
quote:

He seems like a nice enough guy on a personal level


I don't think there is an honest bone in his body. Hard to even like someone you can't trust. To me, he simply comes off as crooked, inept, arrogant and self serving.
Posted by StrawsDrawnAtRandom
Member since Sep 2013
21146 posts
Posted on 9/10/14 at 10:12 pm to
quote:

What he means is that these here are them douchebag Islamists.


I actually thought that was pretty obvious.

Clearly what he meant. Same with "Atheist" nations out there that are falsely attributed. (North Korea)
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
111513 posts
Posted on 9/10/14 at 10:12 pm to
quote:

And ISIL is certainly not a state.

What junior debate jockey crafted this steaming pile of nonsense?

What conditions for being a state do they not meet?
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
111513 posts
Posted on 9/10/14 at 10:14 pm to
quote:

EVERYTHING he does is dictated by the establishment that backs him.

Because he has no leadership skills, no executive ability and a myopic, utopian view of the way the world works. Other than that, we should be fine.
Posted by Roger Klarvin
DFW
Member since Nov 2012
46507 posts
Posted on 9/10/14 at 10:17 pm to
quote:

To me, he simply comes off as crooked, inept, arrogant and self serving.


I think he is just weak and idealistic.
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
111513 posts
Posted on 9/10/14 at 10:18 pm to
I think he's all those.

He's corruptible but idealistic.
Posted by Alahunter
Member since Jan 2008
90738 posts
Posted on 9/10/14 at 10:18 pm to
quote:

What he means is that these here are them douchebag Islamists. I actually thought that was pretty obvious. Clearly what he meant


Which would still be a misrepresentation and outright lie.

quote:

"When you encounter the unbelievers on the battlefield, strike off their heads until you have crushed them completely; then bind the prisoners tightly."


quote:

For centuries, leading Islamic scholars have interpreted this verse literally. The famous Iranian historian and Qur'an commentator Muhammad b. Jarir at-Tabari (d. 923 C.E.) wrote that "striking at the necks" is simply God's sanction of ferocious opposition to non-Muslims.[13] Mahmud b. Umar az-Zamakhshari (d. 1143 C.E.), in a major commentary studied for centuries by Sunni religious scholars, suggested that any prescription to "strike at the necks" commands to avoid striking elsewhere so as to confirm death and not simply wound


quote:

Many recent interpretations remain consistent with those of a millennium ago. In his Saudi-distributed translation of the Qur'an, 'Abdullah Yusuf 'Ali (d. 1953) wrote that the injunction to "smite at their necks," should be taken both literally and figuratively. "You cannot wage war with kid gloves," Yusuf 'Ali argued


quote:

Perhaps the most influential modern recapitulation of this passage was provided by the influential Pakistani scholar and leading Islamist thinker S. Abul A' la Mawdudi (d. 1979), who argued that the sura provided the first Qur'anic prescriptions on the laws of war.


quote:

Another, albeit less-frequently, cited Qur'anic passage also sanctions beheadings of non-Muslims. Sura 8:12 reads: "I will cast dread into the hearts of the unbelievers. Strike off their heads, then, and strike off all of their fingertips."


The practice of beheading non-Muslim captives extends back to the Prophet himself. Ibn Ishaq (d. 768 C.E.)

After the battle of Zallaqa in 1086, he had 24,000 corpses of the defeated Castilians beheaded

. Upon the Ottoman victory over Christian Serbs at the battle of Kosovo in 1389, the Muslim army beheaded the Serbian king and scores of Christian prisoners. At the battle of Varna in 1444, the Ottomans beheaded King Ladislaus of Hungary and "put his head at the tip of a long pike … and brandished it toward the Poles and Hungarians

In 1456, the sultan allowed the grand mufti of the empire to personally decapitate King Stephen of Bosnia and his sons—even though they had surrendered and, seven decades later, the sultan ordered 2,000 Hungarian prisoners beheaded

An 1807 British expedition to Egypt resulted in "a few hundred spiked British heads left rotting in the sun outside Rosetta

In early 1980, the Saudi government publicly beheaded 'Utaybi and his imprisoned followers. While outsiders may consider the Saudi practice barbaric, most Saudi executions are swift, completed in one sword blow. Zarqawi and his followers have chosen a slow, torturous sawing method to terrorize the Western audience.


Posted by Vols&Shaft83
Throbbing Member
Member since Dec 2012
69902 posts
Posted on 9/10/14 at 10:20 pm to
quote:

To me, he simply comes off as crooked, inept, arrogant and self serving.


I think he is just weak and idealistic.




But He's a good boy who done nothing wrong, never hurt nobody, about to turn his life around tho.
Posted by Duke
Twin Lakes, CO
Member since Jan 2008
35610 posts
Posted on 9/10/14 at 10:24 pm to
Are you saying they aren't douchebags?

Interesting take.
Posted by StrawsDrawnAtRandom
Member since Sep 2013
21146 posts
Posted on 9/10/14 at 10:28 pm to
quote:

And ISIL is certainly not a state.

What junior debate jockey crafted this steaming pile of nonsense?

What conditions for being a state do they not meet?


I don't think they're officially seen as one -- but they are clearly a state if we're speaking pragmatically.
Posted by Alahunter
Member since Jan 2008
90738 posts
Posted on 9/10/14 at 10:28 pm to
I wouldn't elevate them to douchebags. I would say they are subhuman, neanderthal-like, heatherns.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 8Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter