Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message

Independent candidates: What if...?

Posted on 4/27/16 at 3:31 pm
Posted by Ag Zwin
Member since Mar 2016
19911 posts
Posted on 4/27/16 at 3:31 pm
So, Trump calls on Sanders to run as an independent, since he has been "mistreated" by the Democratic party. Of course, this is a self-serving gambit designed to split the Democratic vote for him.

What if, though, BOTH parties' runners-up ran as independents, and we had 4 candidates in the general. How do you think a Clinton-Sanders-Trump-Cruz orgy of politicking would be?

I honestly don't know how that would shake out, but it sounds epic.
Posted by Jon Ham
Member since Jun 2011
28541 posts
Posted on 4/27/16 at 3:37 pm to
No one would get to the 270 electoral voted needed to win the Presidency, so it would go to a vote in the House I think (or something like that). Whichever party controls the House would likely elect their establishment candidate (Hillary for Dems, anyone but Trump for Republicans).
Posted by Evolved Simian
Bushwood Country Club
Member since Sep 2010
20478 posts
Posted on 4/27/16 at 4:12 pm to
quote:

Whichever party controls the House would likely elect their establishment candidate


Paul Ryan would be kingmaker.
Posted by JustGetItRight
Member since Jan 2012
15712 posts
Posted on 4/27/16 at 4:47 pm to
quote:

Paul Ryan would be kingmaker.


Only partially. The House can only consider the top 3 electoral vote winners. Using the primaries as a guide, that would almost certainly be Clinton, Trump, and Cruz - with the result being President Cruz.

The FAR more interesting proceeding would be the selection of the Vice-President. The House selects the President, but their running mate does not automatically become the VP. The Vice President is selected by the Senate and they can only choose between the top TWO candidates.

Again, using the primary elections as a guide, you would probably see the Electoral college totals go Clinton, Trump, Cruz. Cruz would almost certainly be elected President, but his VP candidate would be out of contention - leaving him forced to work with the Trump VP candidate or even potentially a VP from the Democratic party.

Posted by Ag Zwin
Member since Mar 2016
19911 posts
Posted on 4/27/16 at 5:13 pm to
quote:

Only partially. The House can only consider the top 3 electoral vote winners. Using the primaries as a guide, that would almost certainly be Clinton, Trump, and Cruz - with the result being President Cruz.



Did not know that part about only the top 3. Good find.

But, since the states vote en bloc, and it requires a majority, I really don't know how that would pan out. I don't see Trump or Cruz deferring to each other, nor do I see Clinton dropping out. I could see her coming in last, simply because of the power of smaller mid-continent states (generally more conservative), but, again, I don't see the logjam getting broken by the candidates themselves. The dealmaking would be off the charts.
Posted by SCLibertarian
Conway, South Carolina
Member since Aug 2013
35955 posts
Posted on 4/28/16 at 12:30 pm to
The problem would be getting on the ballot. States control who's on the ballot, and most make it so hard for 3rd party candidates that I don't know how you could have either runner-up on the ballot in more than a handful of states.
Posted by The Spleen
Member since Dec 2010
38865 posts
Posted on 4/28/16 at 12:41 pm to
I believe the deadline has already passed in several states to get on the November ballot as an independent.
Posted by Kentucker
Cincinnati, KY
Member since Apr 2013
19351 posts
Posted on 4/28/16 at 12:48 pm to
Sanders will support Clinton but I can't see Trump and Cruz making a deal. Both have giant egos and I can see either of them in a third party campaign against the other.

Whoever wins the Republican nomination will be at a disadvantage because of the acrimonious campaign by everyone involved. The RNC does not have a handle on the candidates as does the DNC.

There are going to be a lot of hurt feelings after the Republican Convention in Cleveland, I think. Trump is forcing the GOP to change and a lot of the good old boys in the party don't like it one little bit.
Posted by JustGetItRight
Member since Jan 2012
15712 posts
Posted on 4/28/16 at 9:45 pm to
quote:

There are going to be a lot of hurt feelings after the Republican Convention in Cleveland, I think.


I don't think so now. Trump is going to have it wrapped up before the convention. The party will grudgingly fall in line and Trump will be magnanimous. They need each other. The party needs unity not only for the Presidential race but also for the House and Senate and Trump needs the insiders to work the general election ground game.

They may hate it, but they will make nice and make it work.
Posted by MIZ_COU
I'm right here
Member since Oct 2013
13771 posts
Posted on 4/28/16 at 9:53 pm to
Only way Trumpf can win. But it's clever. No way Sanders see's thru this
Posted by JustGetItRight
Member since Jan 2012
15712 posts
Posted on 4/29/16 at 7:32 am to
quote:

Only way Trumpf can win.


The funny part is you actually believe this.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter