re: Five Things 90's Babies Believe that Aren't True

quote:

---

Because they are cheaper to grow and fewer people demand organic produce. I don't see how that's relevant to which method is more ecologically sound.

---

How are non-organic crops cheaper to grow if it requires more land, more water, more fertilizer, more pesticide, and lower nutritional value?

Regarding ecology, if you are backing away from the economic factors, please explain to me how a non-organic crop that requires less water, less land, less fertilizer, less pesticide is worse for the environment?

The economic and ecological factors go hand in hand.