Started By
Message

re: Does anyone believe the story of Noah's ark?

Posted on 4/3/16 at 1:44 pm to
Posted by hawgfaninc
https://youtu.be/torc9P4-k5A
Member since Nov 2011
46426 posts
Posted on 4/3/16 at 1:44 pm to
quote:

I think the exact opposite. For anyone to say they know God's real is a foolish arrogant notion. How can you?

the same way people believe aliens and other supernatural beings are real

the difference being none of those other supernatural beings have impacted my life
This post was edited on 4/3/16 at 1:46 pm
Posted by BamaChemE
Midland, TX
Member since Feb 2012
7140 posts
Posted on 4/3/16 at 1:50 pm to
quote:

I think the exact opposite. For anyone to say they know God's real is a foolish arrogant notion. How can you? I'm not talking about believing he's real. Knowing. And you can't know. Everything we know of God was told to us by people with no more experience in the afterlife than any one of us in this thread.


I tended to think that way. This very short book turned me on to a route of investigation that has given me a more scientific leg on which to base my faith. Does it answer every question, no, but I've become convinced that the Bible is something that was written by a being outside of the constraints of time.

If you're into engineering stuff (particularly communications engineering) there's some really intriguing evidence as to how the Bible is designed and set up in a way very similar to a hologram. I think people have to find the way that God chooses to communicate with them.

I don't intend to really have a lot of conversation about this, but I did want to put out there that there's actually some mathematical evidence about the design, word choice, and spelling of every detail in the Bible, that has been evidence to convince me that there is God, and that He's so much more than what a lot of modern churches portray Him to be. If you don't care enough to really dig into the research, then that's cool and you can do your own thing, but if you diligently search (and not just current form of research of find a reference that agrees with you and that's it), then you'll probably be surprised at what you find.

Definitely didn't intend this post to turn into the rambling that it did. So, and I'll be happy to have a beer with you anytime.
Posted by Stacked
Member since Apr 2012
5675 posts
Posted on 4/3/16 at 1:51 pm to
I think you're mixing up the words "know" and "believe". We don't know aliens are real because we have know proof. We can believe they're probably real, but we can't know until we see one.

You believe God is real, unless there's some proof I'm missing from your story.

Edited: to prove my point that you can't know God is real, I could start a thread saying "I need proof God is real" and these same people arguing with me would say "You just have to have faith."
This post was edited on 4/3/16 at 1:55 pm
Posted by hawgfaninc
https://youtu.be/torc9P4-k5A
Member since Nov 2011
46426 posts
Posted on 4/3/16 at 1:53 pm to
I believe aliens might be real

I believe God is real

not that complicated
Posted by hawgfaninc
https://youtu.be/torc9P4-k5A
Member since Nov 2011
46426 posts
Posted on 4/3/16 at 1:56 pm to
what I believe is what I know

I know what I believe
Posted by oneusairman
somewhereville
Member since Apr 2009
568 posts
Posted on 4/3/16 at 2:13 pm to
quote:

Your oatmeal is real. I don't doubt your experience eating it.



But you yourself didn't see it, so you would have to believe he had oatmeal in order to recognize and think he did. That is what the essence of faith is. You may want to bash Christians for there believes and faith but in order for you to believe in god or no god still requires faith or believe that you yourself will never see or know. I can make the same case for non-believers and for believer's. Either you have a belief that requires faith in that there is a god or that there is not a god. You will never be able to prove one way or another.
This post was edited on 4/3/16 at 2:16 pm
Posted by Stacked
Member since Apr 2012
5675 posts
Posted on 4/3/16 at 2:29 pm to
quote:

But you yourself didn't see it, so you would have to believe he had oatmeal in order to recognize and think he did.


LOLOLOLOLOLOLOL

Dude, the oatmeal can be seen, it's real. I don't have to take his word on it. I can drive to his fricking house and see it. I can do that all because it's real. Neither I nor you can do any of those things regarding God.
Posted by tduecen
Member since Nov 2006
161244 posts
Posted on 4/3/16 at 2:31 pm to
I believe in a great flood... science proves this happened
Posted by Stacked
Member since Apr 2012
5675 posts
Posted on 4/3/16 at 2:52 pm to
Science? What science? What scientific proof is there that the whole earth was under water. I'll wait. In my experience as a Christian, that's just something we say. There's enormous floods every year, giant ones every hundred. I'm sure there's proof of unthinkable floods over earth's existence, still leaving scars on the earth for us to see.

But that isn't what the bible describes.

The bible says the entire earth was underwater. All species in existence were cut down to only two or seven in existence.

Whole earth, underwater, scientific proof, go.
This post was edited on 4/3/16 at 2:57 pm
Posted by Kentucker
Cincinnati, KY
Member since Apr 2013
19351 posts
Posted on 4/3/16 at 3:00 pm to
quote:

That's ridiculous. Big bang cosmology rules the roost and that's what the evidence supports. The universe had a beginning.


Yes, the evidence points to the beginning of our Universe at the Big Bang. However, the study of existence now goes beyond that point.

What came before the Big Bang? What caused it? Does cause and effect go beyond that point?

"Beginning and end" may just be a human construct. Something we use to reconcile what we see.



Posted by BamaChemE
Midland, TX
Member since Feb 2012
7140 posts
Posted on 4/3/16 at 3:01 pm to
quote:

Science? What science?


Here's a peer reviewed article from the Journal Science

This is certainly no hard and fast proof that the whole earth was underwater like you want, but it does make the line from Genesis 7:11
quote:

on that day all the fountains of the great deep burst forth
seem plausible...
Posted by Old Sarge
Dean of Admissions, LSU
Member since Jan 2012
55289 posts
Posted on 4/3/16 at 3:07 pm to
quote:

Dude, the oatmeal can be seen, it's real. I don't have to take his word on it. I can drive to his fricking house and see it.


No you can't, I ate it this morning. You only have my word that it was real, but yet your logic tells us that you can also discern what it tasted like and how satisfying it was.
Posted by tduecen
Member since Nov 2006
161244 posts
Posted on 4/3/16 at 3:08 pm to
quote:

whole earth was under water.
I did not say that you are putting those words in there. I said big flood and several different religions mention the flood.
quote:

Now Ballard is using even more advanced robotic technology to travel farther back in time. He is on a marine archeological mission that might support the story of Noah. He said some 12,000 years ago, much of the world was covered in ice.

"Where I live in Connecticut was ice a mile above my house, all the way back to the North Pole, about 15 million kilometers, that's a big ice cube," he said. "But then it started to melt. We're talking about the floods of our living history."

The water from the melting glaciers began to rush toward the world's oceans, Ballard said, causing floods all around the world.

"The questions is, was there a mother of all floods," Ballard said.

According to a controversial theory proposed by two Columbia University scientists, there really was one in the Black Sea region. They believe that the now-salty Black Sea was once an isolated freshwater lake surrounded by farmland, until it was flooded by an enormous wall of water from the rising Mediterranean Sea. The force of the water was two hundred times that of Niagara Falls, sweeping away everything in its path.


quote:

Four hundred feet below the surface, they unearthed an ancient shoreline, proof to Ballard that a catastrophic event did happen in the Black Sea. By carbon dating shells found along the shoreline, Ballard said he believes they have established a timeline for that catastrophic event, which he estimates happened around 5,000 BC. Some experts believe this was around the time when Noah's flood could have occurred.

"It probably was a bad day," Ballard said. "At some magic moment, it broke through and flooded this place violently, and a lot of real estate, 150,000 square kilometers of land, went under." '

The theory goes on to suggest that the story of this traumatic event, seared into the collective memory of the survivors, was passed down from generation to generation and eventually inspired the biblical account of Noah.


Now I do believe there was a gigantic flood that altered Earth as it was during that time. One that changed everything about what we know about Earth currently.

Posted by Kentucker
Cincinnati, KY
Member since Apr 2013
19351 posts
Posted on 4/3/16 at 3:15 pm to
quote:

earth was underwater like you want, but it does make the line from Genesis 7:11

quote:

on that day all the fountains of the great deep burst forth


I doubt that the writers of the Bible had the geological knowledge to know that the subduction of tectonic plates under others carries with them great quantities of the earth's supply of water. In the quote below from your link, the operative word is cycle.

The amount of water on the earth's surface remains static, as does the subterranean reservoir. The only evidence of water levels rising and falling is another cycle, the freezing and thawing of water at the poles and high altitudes.


quote:

The water cycle involves more than just the water that circulates between the atmosphere, oceans, and surface waters. It extends deep into Earth's interior as the oceanic crust subducts, or slides, under adjoining plates of crust and sinks into the mantle, carrying water with it.
Posted by BamaChemE
Midland, TX
Member since Feb 2012
7140 posts
Posted on 4/3/16 at 3:21 pm to
quote:

The amount of water on the earth's surface remains static


So there's no possible way that a cataclysmic event could have caused this subterranean ocean to suddenly burst forth before receding again in the distant past?

I didn't say it proved anything. Just that a recent (2 years ago) study has shown that there is more water on Earth than what he had thought for millenia, and it could be argued that an ancient text may have cited this as a contributing source of a cataclysmic flood long before we had any idea there was that much water there.


ETA: I'm glad you actually read the article, most wouldn't.
This post was edited on 4/3/16 at 3:23 pm
Posted by oneusairman
somewhereville
Member since Apr 2009
568 posts
Posted on 4/3/16 at 3:22 pm to
quote:

Dude, the oatmeal can be seen, it's real. I don't have to take his word on it. I can drive to his fricking house and see it. I can do that all because it's real. Neither I nor you can do any of those things regarding God.


Let me reword since you obviously missed the point. You also defected from what the main point was.

Through out life things will happen that you don't see. It could be anything. You get this information from a second source usually not from the main source. It could be a news report of a natural disaster. You weren't there but you can see the evidence of it happening. So you either choose to believe it happened or you choose to believe that it didn't happen. Lets say its the Flood there is scientific proof that the arc did exist and there was a flood but you choose not to believe it. You are putting your faith into your own beliefs. So why is it any more wrong for a person to believe in the bible? It is a second source that someone chooses to believe in. It is backed up by some scientific evidence. However, it can not be disproved or factually proven accurate. We just don't have that much proof to go on. It requires belief and faith. Is it anymore wrong for someone to have faith in a belief, then to not have faith in a belief? Both decision require a belief into something. Oh, btw science is theory and requires belief just so you know. Still a scientist who believes in evolution (theory) requires a leap of faith in his own beliefs.
This post was edited on 4/3/16 at 3:24 pm
Posted by Kentucker
Cincinnati, KY
Member since Apr 2013
19351 posts
Posted on 4/3/16 at 3:25 pm to
quote:

Now I do believe there was a gigantic flood that altered Earth as it was during that time. One that changed everything about what we know about Earth currently.


I wouldn't go so far as to say it changed what we know about the entire earth as we know it today but it certainly changed what those ancient people knew about their environment. The flood from the Mediterranean Sea into the Black Sea was rapid enough to be classified as a flood.

The freshwater Black Sea became a much bigger saltwater body of water. You can see in the illustration below that peoples living close to the banks of the freshwater lake would've been forced to retreat far away.

This post was edited on 4/3/16 at 3:38 pm
Posted by BlackPawnMartyr
Houston, TX
Member since Dec 2010
15301 posts
Posted on 4/3/16 at 3:31 pm to
quote:

Oh, btw science is theory and requires belief just so you know.


A theory doesnt require belief. A theory requires further testing and retesting. To never stop looking for more information on the subject. Science is not an institution. Science is a method of collecting and analyzing data. Its not mindlessly believing something just bc it was passed down to you.
Posted by oneusairman
somewhereville
Member since Apr 2009
568 posts
Posted on 4/3/16 at 3:37 pm to
quote:

A theory doesnt require belief. A theory requires further testing and retesting. To never stop looking for more information on the subject. Science is not an institution. Science is a method of collecting and analyzing data. Its not mindlessly believing something just bc it was passed down to you.


You might want to look up the definition of belief. Oh I will do it for you.

belief
b?'li?f/Submit
noun
1.
an acceptance that something exists or is true, especially one without proof.
"his belief in extraterrestrial life"
2.
trust, faith, or confidence in (someone or something).
"a belief in democratic politics"

Without a belief there would be no theory. You have to belief in a theory in order to test it. If not so, why test it at all if you do not believe?
Posted by Kentucker
Cincinnati, KY
Member since Apr 2013
19351 posts
Posted on 4/3/16 at 3:37 pm to
quote:

So there's no possible way that a cataclysmic event could have caused this subterranean ocean to suddenly burst forth before receding again in the distant past?


Essentially, no. As the earth formed, lots of water was released from water-containing asteroids by the heat of the impacts.

A lot wasn't. It remains underground as compounds with other molecules.

The average amount of water that composes meteorites that hit the earth is 20%. The solar system contains vast amounts of water that either frozen or tied up in compounds.

There's no known mechanism, or evidence, of water cycling from underground to the surface in amounts that would inundate all of the continents.

quote:

I'm glad you actually read the article, most wouldn't


I'm an absolute sucker for science. If somebody posts a link to a science article, I'm going to read it. If I haven't already.
Jump to page
Page 1 2 3 4 5 ... 15
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 15Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter