Started By
Message
1
Posted on 7/27/15 at 6:15 pm to genro
It's all those damn Jews and their weather machine.
Posted on 7/27/15 at 7:26 pm to Patton
The liberal media is controlling the weather.
Posted on 7/27/15 at 7:28 pm to Patton
Government only funds 99.999999999% of science research
Posted on 7/27/15 at 7:36 pm to olddawg26
The deniers are ignorant frick wads that put politics above all else in life including common sense.
Posted on 7/27/15 at 7:40 pm to Patton
quote:
It's all those damn Jews and their weather machine.
I dont like anti semitism. (and of course I get the snarky jest intent. I think.)
This post was edited on 7/27/15 at 7:41 pm
Posted on 7/27/15 at 7:53 pm to boogiewoogie1978
I don't mind corporations putting stock in making the earth a better place and do applaud them for it.
I do mind when the government forces regulations based on unproven science on the general populace.
I do mind when the government forces regulations based on unproven science on the general populace.
Posted on 7/27/15 at 8:15 pm to boogiewoogie1978
Didn't we bail out Goldman Sachs a few years ago? Weren't they completely broke?
Now they have billions to give away?
This stinks to high Heaven.
I get it with Apple, MSFT, and GOOG, they are in the middle of migrating all of their data centers into cloud infrastructure, which costs alot of money, but has one advantage of using less resources.... so I get that they are turning a business decision into a PR campaign. Good for them.
But Goldman Sachs?
High Heaven smells this shite. Extortion maybe?
Now they have billions to give away?
This stinks to high Heaven.
I get it with Apple, MSFT, and GOOG, they are in the middle of migrating all of their data centers into cloud infrastructure, which costs alot of money, but has one advantage of using less resources.... so I get that they are turning a business decision into a PR campaign. Good for them.
But Goldman Sachs?
High Heaven smells this shite. Extortion maybe?
Posted on 7/27/15 at 8:19 pm to 3nOut
quote:
I do mind when the government forces regulations based on unproven science on the general populace.
So you need more evidence to believe in climate change?
Posted on 7/27/15 at 8:27 pm to deeprig9
quote:
Didn't we bail out Goldman Sachs a few years ago? Weren't they completely broke?
Now they have billions to give away?
Goldman did get TARP money... they also repaid it in less than a year. In fact, "taxpayers" (ie, the government) made about $1.4 billion on the deal.
Posted on 7/27/15 at 8:37 pm to MustangReb
quote:
In fact, "taxpayers" (ie, the government) made about $1.4 billion on the deal.
I don't believe you.
Posted on 7/27/15 at 9:17 pm to Stonehog
quote:
So you need more evidence to believe in climate change?
You know that's probably not his stance, nor did he state it was. Global warming can't be denied, geology proves that much, but humanities' impact on it can be argued, depending on the source that deciphers the data points.
Posted on 7/27/15 at 9:28 pm to MustangReb
Goldman actually tried to turn down tarp money.
The deniers on this topic are also the type that believe in conspiracies, ufo, and the general drivel of the uneducated or disenfranchised.
The deniers on this topic are also the type that believe in conspiracies, ufo, and the general drivel of the uneducated or disenfranchised.
This post was edited on 7/27/15 at 9:30 pm
Posted on 7/27/15 at 9:31 pm to boogiewoogie1978
Sounds good to me.
Posted on 7/27/15 at 9:35 pm to Tiger n Miami AU83
What do you classify as a "denier"? Someone that questions man's impact on global climate, or those that deny global warming exists?
I think your inability to converse or make a point without trying to appear like an elitist douche is the main reason behind why most "uneducated underclass" individuals don't pay more attention and become combative.
ETA: Nice edit, should have copied and pasted.
I think your inability to converse or make a point without trying to appear like an elitist douche is the main reason behind why most "uneducated underclass" individuals don't pay more attention and become combative.
ETA: Nice edit, should have copied and pasted.
This post was edited on 7/27/15 at 9:36 pm
Posted on 7/27/15 at 9:38 pm to AUbagman
I don't care. Arguing with people who will deny overwhelming evidence is a pointless endeavour that wastes my time.
I prefer to just call theme stupid and move along these days.
I prefer to just call theme stupid and move along these days.
Posted on 7/27/15 at 9:48 pm to Tiger n Miami AU83
Overwhelming evidence for what? What is your stance? Please do inform me, as I don't know whom you're referring to as a denier.
Posted on 7/27/15 at 9:51 pm to AUbagman
Another time, and only because you are an aubie.
Its bedtime for me.
Its bedtime for me.
Posted on 7/27/15 at 9:59 pm to Tiger n Miami AU83
Sweet dreams
Posted on 7/28/15 at 7:26 am to olddawg26
quote:
Science doesn't have a political side. Go to any natural history museum they have entire exhibits and lectures by the climatologists on this stuff. I attended some in London. It's happening. Pretty soon the deniers will go from "it's a bullshite scam" to "well it's too far gone what can we do now?". Change now.
You are correct about true science. The problem is at this point in time, there is no science involved with climate studies. You can't test a hypothesis. You can't apply the scientific method. Since it isn't science, it has become nothing but political. When the government won't fund any study looking to be objective, only studies look to confirm man made global warming, you can't deny the lack of science.
Page 2 of 3
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News