Started By
Message
re: 9/11 Was A Conspiracy!
Posted on 6/25/14 at 10:54 pm to Sleeping Tiger
Posted on 6/25/14 at 10:54 pm to Sleeping Tiger
quote:
And like it or not 'engineering' is in the title of the university I attended.
Yeah, then I guess every single person who attends A&M and State are experts on agriculture and how it works. Kill yourself, please. I have no patience for this ridiculously stupid conspiracy theory.
3
Posted on 6/25/14 at 10:56 pm to OMLandshark
He on the other hand has plenty of time to obsess over things like this. I don't imagine being in the employ of a vineyard is especially taxing work.
Posted on 6/25/14 at 10:57 pm to OMLandshark
It's sad that this bull shite has generated 8 pages. But, carry on. 
Posted on 6/25/14 at 10:59 pm to Sleeping Tiger
quote:
Even 6 weeks after.
Oh six weeks after. That makes it way more sound. Tell me of any device that can produce magma for 6 fricking weeks. Pretty astounding that that technology doesn't exist to the public and despite the fact that that kind of technology is still decades off and somehow no one working on it reported that it still exists.
Posted on 6/25/14 at 11:11 pm to OMLandshark
quote:
In fact, the steel was turned into molten lava.
It doesn't need to reach melting point, you idiot. Metal expands when it's heated. That's all it takes for it to collapse is for it to get hot enough to buckle in on itself, which tons of jet fuel and a burning building should likely accomplish.
I want you to re-read this and try to understand why it makes no sense.
After taking a second look you should've noticed I said there was liquified metal in the rubble, you chose to refute this by saying the steel didn't need to melt to cause a collapse. Do you see what's wrong here?
Posted on 6/25/14 at 11:18 pm to OMLandshark
quote:
Yeah, then I guess every single person who attends A&M and State are experts on agriculture and how it works. Kill yourself, please. I have no patience for this ridiculously stupid conspiracy theory.
Except in full context I was explaining that nothing I said had anything to do with being a mastermind of engineering. So I wasn't claiming to be an expert in engineering.
I just found a little irony with the whole name of my university thing.
Posted on 6/25/14 at 11:20 pm to OMLandshark
The corium produced from a reactor meltdown would be the only thing.
Posted on 6/25/14 at 11:21 pm to Sleeping Tiger
Is it acceptable that I only read the OP, and then assumed that Sleeping would come here, and that an argument would ensue?
Of course it is.
Of course it is.
Posted on 6/25/14 at 11:25 pm to mikeymike
8 pages?
Without looking, I'm just gonna assume a certain fatigued feline was all over this thread
Without looking, I'm just gonna assume a certain fatigued feline was all over this thread
Posted on 6/25/14 at 11:27 pm to Remote Controlled
I will listen to a 9/11 conspiracy theorist when they have a full play-by-play on what actually happened and how the pulled off a conspiracy that thousands had to have been a part of. None of them have yet to provide a game plan on what these people actually had, or even who did it. They're just idiots who think this was an elaborate conspiracy.
Posted on 6/25/14 at 11:29 pm to OMLandshark
quote:
Firefighters on the scene reported molten lava. What does sharing that have to do with being any kind of mastermind?
No, they reported fuel on fire coming down the elevator shafts, which should more or less look like molten lava.
In this thread there is a link to firefighters saying there was molten lava, "like a volcano", in the rubble.
There is also a link to footage of the cleanup which shows liquid metal with the commentary of a construction manager (or some guy with authority at the site) reporting on the hot molten lava.
There are quotes from official reports confirming there was molten lava in the rubble.
Posted on 6/25/14 at 11:33 pm to Sleeping Tiger
Ok, now explain how.
Posted on 6/25/14 at 11:44 pm to Sleeping Tiger
quote:
There are quotes from official reports confirming there was molten lava in the rubble.
Do you have any idea the amount of energy it takes to make molten lava? So much so that nothing we can do as a species that we can create it for a long period of time. Lava cools very quickly and has to be surrounded by a ton of it. So what you're telling me is that the government is not only sitting on a technology that is scientifically basically impossible, but also they for some reason chose to unveil this during the single greatest conspiracy in human history. I know this is asking a lot of your feeble mind, but please think.
Posted on 6/25/14 at 11:56 pm to Roger Klarvin
quote:
Ok, now explain how.
He was unaware of what the fire fighters had claimed, I made him aware. What he was refuting is different than what has been argued in this thread.
Anyway.. if you all want to say the men at the scene on the day of the event, the men tasked to write reports on the rubble, the images, and video are all wrong in their assessment of molten lava being present in the rubble that's fine.
How liquid metal was created in the rubble seems to an offshoot question of something that isn't being acknowledged. And anyway as one scientist put it 'bitches brew of thermite', cue the Millette piece proving thermite didn't take down the towers, which is now a case of debunking a debunker, as that piece has been properly challenged.
I didn't make this OP because it's a pointless debate, there are way too many things that override this topic to spend time arguing about it.
Posted on 6/26/14 at 12:02 am to Roger Klarvin
quote:
He on the other hand has plenty of time to obsess over things like this. I don't imagine being in the employ of a vineyard is especially taxing wor
I don't even know what to say to this, I'm not sure which is more wrong, that I obsess over conspiracies or that my work isn't taxing.
Posted on 6/26/14 at 12:19 am to Sleeping Tiger
LINK
A debate that starts at 5:00 really mirrors how this thread and all threads on topics like this go.
A debate that starts at 5:00 really mirrors how this thread and all threads on topics like this go.
This post was edited on 6/26/14 at 12:20 am
Posted on 6/26/14 at 12:32 am to Sleeping Tiger
quote:
Anyway.. if you all want to say the men at the scene on the day of the event, the men tasked to write reports on the rubble, the images, and video are all wrong in their assessment of molten lava being present in the rubble that's fine.
I don't give a frick about eyewitnesses as long as you can't convince me that it is scientifically possible. There are plenty of so-called "eyewitnesses" that claim things just as bizarre as that, but they have no evidence, and this is even more ridiculous since it is scientifically impossible. If I threw a few gallons of lava into your den, it would solidify within the minute, and you'd be able to comfortably walk on it within 10 minutes. Lava doesn't just flow through a building that was just seconds ago at room temperature, not to mention 6 weeks later. Your understanding of basic reality are flawed, and you are educationally subnormal to think that lava could just hang around for over a month.
This post was edited on 6/26/14 at 12:35 am
Posted on 6/26/14 at 12:42 am to Sleeping Tiger
Sleeping Tiger is the most intelligent, enlightened, educated and rational poster on the OTB. All of his posts use watertight logic and are supported by well respected research.
Posted on 6/26/14 at 5:47 am to mikeymike
1/10
Posted on 6/26/14 at 6:51 am to mikeymike
What's amazing is that when conspiracy theorists think that bombs where planted, they automatically say the government planted them. Don't you think that it could have been terrorists that planted them rather than the fricking government? It's a must for you retards to automatically blame the government.
Page 8 of 48
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News